agree,

來源: kukuren2000 2012-03-22 20:36:45 [] [舊帖] [給我悄悄話] 本文已被閱讀: 次 (587 bytes)

agree, C0 should definitely Not be ignored, and most of time, it is negative in fact.

and when there is a conflict between NPV and IRR on an investment evaluation,  the correct answer is provided by NPV. 


所有跟帖: 

There are circumstances where the NPV rule and IRR rule -kukuren2000- 給 kukuren2000 發送悄悄話 (1503 bytes) () 03/22/2012 postreply 22:07:28

IRR model is totally wrong. Considering if you have multi IRRs. -sweetptt- 給 sweetptt 發送悄悄話 sweetptt 的博客首頁 (0 bytes) () 03/22/2012 postreply 22:19:47

yes, IRR model is more limited. -kukuren2000- 給 kukuren2000 發送悄悄話 (0 bytes) () 03/22/2012 postreply 22:28:25

IRR是分析是否值得投資,而NPV是計算具體回報,兩者相互相成,一點都不衝突 -大家幫我買房- 給 大家幫我買房 發送悄悄話 大家幫我買房 的博客首頁 (0 bytes) () 03/23/2012 postreply 08:01:26

kukuren2000是明白人 -大家幫我買房- 給 大家幫我買房 發送悄悄話 大家幫我買房 的博客首頁 (0 bytes) () 03/23/2012 postreply 07:59:53

請您先登陸,再發跟帖!

發現Adblock插件

如要繼續瀏覽
請支持本站 請務必在本站關閉/移除任何Adblock

關閉Adblock後 請點擊

請參考如何關閉Adblock/Adblock plus

安裝Adblock plus用戶請點擊瀏覽器圖標
選擇“Disable on www.wenxuecity.com”

安裝Adblock用戶請點擊圖標
選擇“don't run on pages on this domain”