1. "股市漲，call值錢。所以它沒問題。" (If the market rises, call options are valuable, so it’s fine.)
True – When the market rises, JEPQ's covered calls generate high premiums, which support its dividend payouts. However, this also means JEPQ’s upside is capped, since the stocks can get called away if they rise too much.
2. "一旦股市跌，call就不值錢，那就得多賣。" (If the market falls, call options become worthless, so it has to sell more calls.)
Partially True – In a falling market, call options generate lower premiums because there’s less demand. However:
-
JEPQ still earns some premium, though less than in a bull market.
-
JEPQ owns stocks (not just options), so it still has value.
3. "賣多了，一旦股市上漲，全被call走，還得追高。" (If it sells too many calls and the market rises, the stocks are called away, and it has to buy back at a higher price.)
Not exactly – JEPQ mainly uses out-of-the-money (OTM) call options, meaning:
-
If the market rises a little, JEPQ keeps its stocks.
-
If the market surges, some gains are lost, but JEPQ still profits from stock appreciation within the call strike limits.
-
It doesn’t "lose all its stocks"—covered call ETFs don’t sell all holdings automatically.
JEPQ managers adjust call positions actively to reduce this risk (e.g., rolling options up to higher strikes).
4. "所以就得花錢 rollover." (So it has to spend money rolling over calls.)
True, but not always a bad thing – Rolling covered calls is a common practice to avoid losing too much upside.
-
If done well, it limits loss while maintaining income.
-
If done poorly, it can hurt returns.
However, JEPQ is actively managed, which helps reduce this risk compared to fully mechanical strategies like QYLD.
5. "股市可以恢複，它不見得能恢複。" (The stock market can recover, but JEPQ may not fully recover.)
Mostly true – If the Nasdaq fully rebounds, JEPQ won’t rise as much as QQQ, because:
-
Covered calls limit upside gains.
-
It still pays out dividends instead of reinvesting them.
So, JEPQ’s recovery can lag behind QQQ, but it still recovers over time.
6. "如果多年熊市或平市，那就更難了。" (If there’s a multi-year bear or flat market, it gets worse.)
True – A prolonged bear market means:
-
Lower call premiums → Lower dividends.
-
Stock prices stagnate or fall → Lower capital appreciation.
This could hurt total returns if the Nasdaq-100 stays weak for many years.
7. "為了提供吸引力，分紅不能降，那就是拿你的本金來分紅以吸引新錢。" (To maintain high dividends, it may use principal to pay dividends, attracting new investors.)
Possible, but not entirely accurate – Covered call ETFs rely on option premiums, but:
-
If option income declines, the dividend may be reduced (not automatically pulling from principal).
-
Some covered call funds (e.g., QYLD) have been criticized for eroding capital over time, but JEPQ is actively managed to mitigate this.
So, dividends can drop in bad markets, but it’s not necessarily a Ponzi-like system.
8. "逐漸的變成殺豬盤。很多人最終會慘虧。" (Eventually, it becomes a Ponzi scheme, and many investors will lose badly.)
Exaggeration – JEPQ isn’t a Ponzi scheme, but:
-
Investors who don’t understand the covered call strategy may expect QQQ-like growth while collecting 8-10% dividends, which is unrealistic.
-
If bought at the wrong time (e.g., before a market crash) and sold in panic, investors can lose money.
However, JEPQ won’t go to zero unless the entire Nasdaq collapses.
Final Verdict:
| Statement | True? | Notes |
|---|---|---|
| Market rises → Calls generate income → No problem | But upside is capped. | |
| Market falls → Calls generate less → More selling needed | Lower call premiums, but not zero. | |
| Too many calls → Stocks get called away → Buying back at high prices | Uses OTM calls, so not all stocks get sold. | |
| Must spend money rolling calls | Standard risk management. | |
| Market recovers, JEPQ may not fully recover | Limited upside vs. QQQ. | |
| Multi-year bear or flat market is bad | Lower income and stock growth. | |
| May use principal to maintain dividends | ? | Possible in extreme cases, but not the norm. |
| Becomes a Ponzi scheme | No, but investors can lose money if they don’t understand the risks. |
Key Takeaways:
-
JEPQ is not a "scam" or "Ponzi", but it trades growth for income.
-
It won’t perform well in prolonged bear markets and may lag during recoveries.
-
It’s best for income investors, not for those expecting full Nasdaq growth.
==============
"任何紅利不是以公司產品的盈利產生的，而是以人為的衍生工具炒出來的。"
(Any dividend that doesn’t come from a company’s product earnings, but rather from financial derivatives, is just speculation.)
Partially True – JEPQ’s dividends do not come from company profits (like traditional dividend stocks such as KO, JNJ).
-
Instead, JEPQ generates income from selling covered call options on Nasdaq-100 stocks.
-
These option premiums are then distributed as dividends, rather than coming from business profits.
But Misleading –
-
Covered call strategies are legitimate financial tools, widely used by institutional investors.
-
JEPQ still owns stocks in the Nasdaq-100, which provide some capital appreciation potential.
-
Just because the dividend comes from options doesn’t mean it’s a scam—it’s a structured income strategy.
"都是耍流氓，風險不小早晚得出事！"
(This is reckless, the risk is high, and it will eventually collapse.)
Exaggerated –
JEPQ does carry risks, but it is not a "ticking time bomb." Key risks include:
-
Lower upside potential (caps growth due to covered calls).
-
Dividend sustainability issues in prolonged bear markets (if call premiums shrink).
-
Not suitable for all investors (best for those seeking income, not pure growth).
However, JEPQ is not designed to collapse—it’s simply an income-focused ETF that trades growth for stability and cash flow.
Final Verdict:
-
JEPQ does not pay dividends from company profits, but from option premiums (true).
-
This doesn’t mean it’s a scam—it’s just a different investment strategy.
-
It has risks (limited upside, possible dividend cuts in bear markets), but it won’t “blow up” randomly.
Who should buy JEPQ?
Good for income-focused investors who understand covered call strategies.
Not ideal for growth investors expecting full Nasdaq-100 upside.
====================
1. "When the price falls, dividend will go lower, then lower."
Mostly True – JEPQ’s dividends come from covered call premiums, not company profits.
-
If the market drops, call option premiums decrease, leading to lower dividend payouts.
-
In a prolonged bear market, JEPQ’s yield could shrink significantly because its income source (option premiums) weakens.
Example:
-
In a strong bull market → High call premiums → Higher dividends
-
In a bear market → Low call premiums → Lower dividends
However, it won’t necessarily go to zero, as JEPQ still holds Nasdaq-100 stocks that may generate some value.
2. "It uses your principal to pay you back."
? Partially True, but Misleading
-
JEPQ’s dividends come from option premiums, not directly from selling stocks (principal).
-
However, in a prolonged bear market, if option premiums shrink too much, JEPQ might sell assets or have a declining NAV (Net Asset Value), making it feel like your principal is eroding.
Key Point:
-
Unlike traditional dividend stocks (e.g., SCHD), JEPQ’s dividends are not backed by business earnings.
-
But this does not mean JEPQ is a Ponzi scheme—it’s just a different strategy.
3. "And it is not qualified dividends."
True – JEPQ’s income is mostly from short-term capital gains (option premiums), not qualified dividends.
-
Qualified dividends (e.g., from SCHD, VOO) are taxed at lower rates (0%, 15%, or 20%).
-
JEPQ’s distributions are taxed as ordinary income (your regular tax bracket), which can be much higher.
Impact:
-
If held in a taxable account, you pay higher taxes on JEPQ’s income.
-
Better to hold JEPQ in an IRA or 401(k) to avoid tax inefficiency.
4. "You will be in a lose-lose situation."
Exaggerated, but Possible in Some Cases
-
If the market crashes and stays down, JEPQ’s price drops and its income declines → double hit (lower price & lower dividend).
-
But in a stable or slightly rising market, JEPQ can still generate income, just with less upside than QQQ.
Worst-case scenario:
-
Prolonged bear market (like 2000-2010 Nasdaq crash) → JEPQ struggles, price declines, dividends shrink.
-
Best-case scenario:
-
Choppy or sideways market → JEPQ collects steady premiums and delivers solid income.
Final Verdict:
| Statement | True? | Notes |
|---|---|---|
| Price drop → Lower dividends | Less option income in bear markets. | |
| Uses principal for dividends | ? | Not directly, but NAV can decline over time. |
| Not qualified dividends | Taxed as ordinary income. | |
| Lose-lose situation | Only in extreme bear markets; otherwise, JEPQ provides stable income. |
Key Takeaways:
-
JEPQ’s dividends are not guaranteed and depend on market conditions.
-
Best for income seekers, not for those looking for Nasdaq-100 growth.
-
Not tax-efficient in a taxable account—better in IRAs or 401(k)s.
-
In a long bear market, JEPQ can struggle, but it’s not an automatic "lose-lose."
