寬宏有大量想得開的，一般不得癌症，這裏有個帖子值得一讀

下麵是Daniel Davis的帖子，出自這裏：

http://www.pocketables.net/2011/08/whats-gonna-happen-to-apple.html#comments

I completely disagree with absolutely EVERYTHING this article has said. It wasn't Steve who innovated in any way, shape or form.

First off- the initial Apple innovations, like the Apple I and Apple II?

That was Steve Wozniak's design. Steve was the salesman, and another individual provided the first funding for manufacture.

Pre-Macintosh? Steve's greatest "contribution" to Apple was to force the designers of the Apple III to omit ventilation holes, leaving a computer that would get so hot that the motherboard chips would pop out.

Steve barely contributed to the Macintosh project at all- that would be the combined genius of Bill Atkinson, Steve Wozniak's revolutionary multi-speed floppy drive, as well as the contributions of countless others.

The outer shell design of the Mac was designed by Jerry Manock and Terry Oyama.

Steve Jobs main contribution to the Macintosh project? Yelling at people and insisting that the design would not have a fan, resulting in overheating and component failure as a result.

Steve was kicked out of Apple because he was a self-serving egomaniac who abused his employees, not because of some sort of vendetta.

And you want to honor this man?

If you want to talk about Modern Apple- you can thank Jonathan Ives for that. Steve Jobs? You can thank him for the disappearance of useful and purposeful buttons on Apple's stuff, resulting in severe loss of functionality.

I welcome an Apple without Job's egomania, without a man who parks in handicapped spots simply because he wants to demonstrate that he can afford the ticket. He is not a visionary- he is not a designer. He is a salesman, selling the ideas of better and brighter men while lapping up the accolades for it.

所有跟帖： 

• 看了這篇文章之後，我想去查查到底拿破侖、麥克阿瑟之流到底親手殺了多少敵人。 -moneyIterator- ♂ (47 bytes) () 08/25/2011 postreply 12:40:11

• 你正好不是寬宏有大量想得開的 -tsc12- ♂ (0 bytes) () 08/25/2011 postreply 12:40:57

• 你在這裏公開給我上課，我都虛心接受，還要怎麽樣才算寬宏有大量想得開？ -fitwxc- ♂ (0 bytes) () 08/25/2011 postreply 12:58:30

• 你詛咒人怎能算寬宏有大量？ -tsc12- ♂ (0 bytes) () 08/25/2011 postreply 14:47:50

• 我詛咒誰了？ -fitwxc- ♂ (0 bytes) () 08/25/2011 postreply 14:56:21

• 哈哈：【戰國策】勞心者治人，勞力者治於人 -逗蟋蟀- ♀ (208 bytes) () 08/25/2011 postreply 12:46:02

• 是啊不知道這麽些大牛們為什麽非要賴在蘋果不走。 -moneyIterator- ♂ (0 bytes) () 08/25/2011 postreply 12:59:38

• 文章偏頗，就算都是事實，不是誰都敢進軍手機市場 -iCall- ♂ (92 bytes) () 08/25/2011 postreply 13:16:47

• 進軍手機市場有啥了不起？ -專門打假- ♀ (0 bytes) () 08/25/2011 postreply 16:14:03

• 沒錯，在深圳，連阿貓阿狗都做手機啦，還說什麽“不是誰都敢進軍手機市場”？：-） -九叔- ♂ (0 bytes) () 08/25/2011 postreply 21:06:57

• 比爾蓋茨沒有厚著臉默認什麽都是他發明的。你們會說本來他就是拷蘋果的 -fitwxc- ♂ (525 bytes) () 08/25/2011 postreply 13:36:39

• 因為這裏有重大不同 -moneyIterator- ♂ (568 bytes) () 08/25/2011 postreply 14:01:17

• 是微軟，而不是蘋果，把PC送入千家萬戶 - 類似地，蘋果讓大眾享受智能手機帶來的好處 -mc3361- ♀ (0 bytes) () 08/25/2011 postreply 14:50:22

• 微軟靠的是低價和PC的開放體係（注意開放是IBM的概念跟微軟無關哦）。 -moneyIterator- ♂ (170 bytes) () 08/25/2011 postreply 15:02:23

• 你說的都是細節，我說的是現象 -mc3361- ♀ (0 bytes) () 08/25/2011 postreply 15:05:26

• 你是說表麵現象？;) -moneyIterator- ♂ (0 bytes) () 08/25/2011 postreply 15:11:36

• 我說的是事實，你企圖解釋現象發生的原因 -mc3361- ♀ (0 bytes) () 08/25/2011 postreply 15:15:04

• 對知識產權的理解很難說得清 -iCall- ♂ (584 bytes) () 08/25/2011 postreply 14:59:10

• 你說得對，要定量地說確實不容易。但是在定性的角度來看，是不是iPhone引起了手機的革命？。 -moneyIterator- ♂ (0 bytes) () 08/25/2011 postreply 15:05:27

• 你對智能手機的曆史太不了解了。微軟正在起訴蘋果你不知道？ -fitwxc- ♂ (0 bytes) () 08/25/2011 postreply 15:00:03

• 微軟在手機上專利還真不多，因為它原來基本不做Cellular部分。 -moneyIterator- ♂ (231 bytes) () 08/25/2011 postreply 15:10:55