Pretty much. but I am not sure about the "nervous" part. I would

it was very significant for you.

Always keep it simple!

所有跟帖： 

• i meant i would not include that "nervous" part. :) -一挪- ♀ (0 bytes) () 07/31/2014 postreply 13:10:38

• I see, thanks. How about the design document? I feel it's too ea -問訊- ♀ (70 bytes) () 07/31/2014 postreply 13:12:34

• simplified: -問訊- ♀ (305 bytes) () 07/31/2014 postreply 13:22:46

• You can't tell the person what to do. Try this one: -廢話多多- ♀ (821 bytes) () 07/31/2014 postreply 13:46:39

• Thanks, this is much better, but I sent the simplified version a -問訊- ♀ (0 bytes) () 07/31/2014 postreply 14:13:50

• 不好意思的說一句，你的version用詞太硬了，我若收到這樣的email不會喜歡。 -arcsigh- ♀ (48 bytes) () 07/31/2014 postreply 19:12:18

• 沒辦法，已經寄出去了，聽天由命吧。 -問訊- ♀ (0 bytes) () 07/31/2014 postreply 19:14:52

• 看來真是不寫還好些。。。 -問訊- ♀ (0 bytes) () 07/31/2014 postreply 19:18:48

• 嗬嗬，沒事啦。對方理解的。你真付合他們的標準他們也不會因為一封email而改變主意。 -arcsigh- ♀ (0 bytes) () 07/31/2014 postreply 19:25:40

• 好吧，謝謝。 -問訊- ♀ (0 bytes) () 07/31/2014 postreply 19:32:59

• 而且不應該用chance而應用opportunity 一詞。 -arcsigh- ♀ (0 bytes) () 07/31/2014 postreply 19:16:47

• 對，太不專業了，噢！ -問訊- ♀ (0 bytes) () 07/31/2014 postreply 19:17:39

• 廢話的這個版本看起來順眼些。 -livinghere- ♂ (0 bytes) () 07/31/2014 postreply 21:25:18

• so, just remove the nervious part, and maybe mention the design -問訊- ♀ (0 bytes) () 07/31/2014 postreply 13:11:22