Removing it won't make the car unsafe to drive

來源: 堅茂 於 2015-09-28 16:34:02 [] [舊帖] [給我悄悄話] 閱讀數 : (619 bytes)
回答: Sway bar 是關鍵的安全裝置之一 由 biglow 於 2015-09-27 19:34:00

Removing it won't make the car unsafe to drive. In fact, anti-sway bars were commonly optional equipment a decade ago. But without the sway bar, the car will not handle and corner as well, or as comfortably for the driver and passengers, and your son will have to get used to driving slower on turns.

所有跟帖： 

• 在很多州是違法的 -soccer88- ♂ 給 soccer88 發送悄悄話 soccer88 的博客首頁 (0 bytes) () 09/28/2015 postreply 16:37:23

• 孤陋寡聞了，請舉證 -堅茂- ♂ 給 堅茂 發送悄悄話 (0 bytes) () 09/28/2015 postreply 16:40:14

• 你的確是的 -soccer88- ♂ 給 soccer88 發送悄悄話 soccer88 的博客首頁 (926 bytes) () 09/28/2015 postreply 16:46:48

• UT州 -soccer88- ♂ 給 soccer88 發送悄悄話 soccer88 的博客首頁 (2622 bytes) () 09/28/2015 postreply 16:49:39

• 你自己開日本車 -修車工- ♂ 給 修車工 發送悄悄話 修車工 的博客首頁 (179 bytes) () 09/28/2015 postreply 16:57:06

• most chinese do if you don't notice -堅茂- ♂ 給 堅茂 發送悄悄話 (0 bytes) () 09/28/2015 postreply 17:14:23

• 就聽說你一個 -soccer88- ♂ 給 soccer88 發送悄悄話 soccer88 的博客首頁 (0 bytes) () 09/28/2015 postreply 17:22:37

• 你不是納悶為什麽問題總是關於日本車的維修？ -堅茂- ♂ 給 堅茂 發送悄悄話 (0 bytes) () 09/28/2015 postreply 17:26:16

• it is not unsafe in this context -堅茂- ♂ 給 堅茂 發送悄悄話 (0 bytes) () 09/28/2015 postreply 17:13:52

• OK， 那為什麽還違法如果是“not unsafe ”， -soccer88- ♂ 給 soccer88 發送悄悄話 soccer88 的博客首頁 (0 bytes) () 09/28/2015 postreply 17:19:50

• some states don't allow modifications -堅茂- ♂ 給 堅茂 發送悄悄話 (0 bytes) () 09/28/2015 postreply 17:24:28

• 在加拿大也是違法的 -soccer88- ♂ 給 soccer88 發送悄悄話 soccer88 的博客首頁 (0 bytes) () 09/28/2015 postreply 17:25:23

• the law prohibits any suspension modifciations including truck/s -堅茂- ♂ 給 堅茂 發送悄悄話 (0 bytes) () 09/28/2015 postreply 17:28:02

• people do anyway, including changing to air suspension or back -堅茂- ♂ 給 堅茂 發送悄悄話 (0 bytes) () 09/28/2015 postreply 17:29:42

• 那你想過沒有，如果出大才禍事故，你的車是違法的會怎麽樣？ -soccer88- ♂ 給 soccer88 發送悄悄話 soccer88 的博客首頁 (0 bytes) () 09/28/2015 postreply 17:32:23

• 有幾次看到出車禍，你會專門去檢查一下sway bar的？ -卵世佳人- ♂ 給 卵世佳人 發送悄悄話 (0 bytes) () 09/29/2015 postreply 18:06:12

• removing an optional component isn't illegal -堅茂- ♂ 給 堅茂 發送悄悄話 (0 bytes) () 09/28/2015 postreply 17:33:19

• 你自己讀一讀，是違法的，Airbag也是 Optional？？？；不和你浪費時間了 -soccer88- ♂ 給 soccer88 發送悄悄話 soccer88 的博客首頁 (0 bytes) () 09/28/2015 postreply 17:35:01

• i had paid extra to have it, now i have taken it off so it is ba -堅茂- ♂ 給 堅茂 發送悄悄話 (0 bytes) () 09/28/2015 postreply 17:37:11

• airbag is mandatory, please don't get confused -堅茂- ♂ 給 堅茂 發送悄悄話 (0 bytes) () 09/28/2015 postreply 17:38:23

• it is nice to have, but not required to have -堅茂- ♂ 給 堅茂 發送悄悄話 (0 bytes) () 09/28/2015 postreply 17:35:11

請您先登陸，再發跟帖！