it is not unsafe in this context

來源: 堅茂 2015-09-28 17:13:52 [] [舊帖] [給我悄悄話] 本文已被閱讀: 次 (0 bytes)
回答: Removing it won't make the car unsafe to drive堅茂2015-09-28 16:34:02

所有跟帖: 

OK, 那為什麽還違法如果是“not unsafe ”, -soccer88- 給 soccer88 發送悄悄話 soccer88 的博客首頁 (0 bytes) () 09/28/2015 postreply 17:19:50

some states don't allow modifications -堅茂- 給 堅茂 發送悄悄話 (0 bytes) () 09/28/2015 postreply 17:24:28

在加拿大也是違法的 -soccer88- 給 soccer88 發送悄悄話 soccer88 的博客首頁 (0 bytes) () 09/28/2015 postreply 17:25:23

the law prohibits any suspension modifciations including truck/s -堅茂- 給 堅茂 發送悄悄話 (0 bytes) () 09/28/2015 postreply 17:28:02

people do anyway, including changing to air suspension or back -堅茂- 給 堅茂 發送悄悄話 (0 bytes) () 09/28/2015 postreply 17:29:42

那你想過沒有,如果出大才禍事故,你的車是違法的會怎麽樣? -soccer88- 給 soccer88 發送悄悄話 soccer88 的博客首頁 (0 bytes) () 09/28/2015 postreply 17:32:23

有幾次看到出車禍,你會專門去檢查一下sway bar的? -卵世佳人- 給 卵世佳人 發送悄悄話 (0 bytes) () 09/29/2015 postreply 18:06:12

removing an optional component isn't illegal -堅茂- 給 堅茂 發送悄悄話 (0 bytes) () 09/28/2015 postreply 17:33:19

你自己讀一讀,是違法的,Airbag也是 Optional???;不和你浪費時間了 -soccer88- 給 soccer88 發送悄悄話 soccer88 的博客首頁 (0 bytes) () 09/28/2015 postreply 17:35:01

i had paid extra to have it, now i have taken it off so it is ba -堅茂- 給 堅茂 發送悄悄話 (0 bytes) () 09/28/2015 postreply 17:37:11

airbag is mandatory, please don't get confused -堅茂- 給 堅茂 發送悄悄話 (0 bytes) () 09/28/2015 postreply 17:38:23

it is nice to have, but not required to have -堅茂- 給 堅茂 發送悄悄話 (0 bytes) () 09/28/2015 postreply 17:35:11

請您先登陸,再發跟帖!

發現Adblock插件

如要繼續瀏覽
請支持本站 請務必在本站關閉/移除任何Adblock

關閉Adblock後 請點擊

請參考如何關閉Adblock/Adblock plus

安裝Adblock plus用戶請點擊瀏覽器圖標
選擇“Disable on www.wenxuecity.com”

安裝Adblock用戶請點擊圖標
選擇“don't run on pages on this domain”