沒有這個車會翻的,比你想象得要容易。一個小轉彎,路不平什麽的,你的車在60 MPH時基本就過去了,沒啥懸念。自己做個受力分析,60 MPH在轉彎半徑300米情況下可能沒事,在30 米半徑下一定翻。
http://bbs.wenxuecity.com/auto/426264.html
沒有這個車會翻的,比你想象得要容易。一個小轉彎,路不平什麽的,你的車在60 MPH時基本就過去了,沒啥懸念。自己做個受力分析,60 MPH在轉彎半徑300米情況下可能沒事,在30 米半徑下一定翻。
http://bbs.wenxuecity.com/auto/426264.html
• 謝謝版主,修車,真是技術活 -修車工- ♂ (0 bytes) () 09/27/2015 postreply 19:35:58
• 這活其實極簡單。就是把這鐵棍給換了。youtube上看看,其實沒什麼麻煩的。 -vw308- ♂ (0 bytes) () 09/28/2015 postreply 10:49:12
• 的確是,但是你看看鏈接,裏麵建議去了 -soccer88- ♂ (0 bytes) () 09/28/2015 postreply 10:52:54
• 鏈接容易鏽蝕,你要卸下前,要噴些PB blaster,在轉螺絲時要先固定bolt.其它沒什麼。 -vw308- ♂ (0 bytes) () 09/28/2015 postreply 12:34:09
• 記得一位同事騎自行車沒問題,騎三輪車就翻了。 -卵世佳人- ♂ (0 bytes) () 09/28/2015 postreply 03:18:32
• 還好沒有試四輪的 -soccer88- ♂ (0 bytes) () 09/28/2015 postreply 15:26:41
• 騎四輪的心態不一樣,估計沒有問題。兩輪到三輪過渡,台階不小。 -卵世佳人- ♂ (0 bytes) () 09/28/2015 postreply 17:11:12
• 那是高速路速度了,不會有那樣的急轉彎吧。有,可就是謀殺了。 -needtime- ♂ (224 bytes) () 09/28/2015 postreply 05:54:40
• 嘿嘿,急轉彎到處都是,這車要不按推薦限速開,跟自殺也沒啥區別。 -biglow- ♂ (0 bytes) () 09/28/2015 postreply 06:49:22
• 幾種情況非常危險, -soccer88- ♂ (74 bytes) () 09/28/2015 postreply 09:04:56
• Is it safe to drive without a sway bar -needtime- ♂ (197 bytes) () 09/28/2015 postreply 11:51:27
• Do you see a vehicle turns over because of not having a sway bar -卵世佳人- ♂ (0 bytes) () 09/29/2015 postreply 17:57:10
• 這裏是原理anti-roll bar (anti-sway bar, sway bar, stabilizer bar)(ZT) -soccer88- ♂ (57188 bytes) () 09/28/2015 postreply 12:25:10
• Removing it won't make the car unsafe to drive -堅茂- ♂ (619 bytes) () 09/28/2015 postreply 16:34:02
• 在很多州是違法的 -soccer88- ♂ (0 bytes) () 09/28/2015 postreply 16:37:23
• 孤陋寡聞了,請舉證 -堅茂- ♂ (0 bytes) () 09/28/2015 postreply 16:40:14
• 你的確是的 -soccer88- ♂ (926 bytes) () 09/28/2015 postreply 16:46:48
• UT州 -soccer88- ♂ (2622 bytes) () 09/28/2015 postreply 16:49:39
• 你自己開日本車 -修車工- ♂ (179 bytes) () 09/28/2015 postreply 16:57:06
• most chinese do if you don't notice -堅茂- ♂ (0 bytes) () 09/28/2015 postreply 17:14:23
• 就聽說你一個 -soccer88- ♂ (0 bytes) () 09/28/2015 postreply 17:22:37
• 你不是納悶為什麽問題總是關於日本車的維修? -堅茂- ♂ (0 bytes) () 09/28/2015 postreply 17:26:16
• it is not unsafe in this context -堅茂- ♂ (0 bytes) () 09/28/2015 postreply 17:13:52
• OK, 那為什麽還違法如果是“not unsafe ”, -soccer88- ♂ (0 bytes) () 09/28/2015 postreply 17:19:50
• some states don't allow modifications -堅茂- ♂ (0 bytes) () 09/28/2015 postreply 17:24:28
• 在加拿大也是違法的 -soccer88- ♂ (0 bytes) () 09/28/2015 postreply 17:25:23
• the law prohibits any suspension modifciations including truck/s -堅茂- ♂ (0 bytes) () 09/28/2015 postreply 17:28:02
• people do anyway, including changing to air suspension or back -堅茂- ♂ (0 bytes) () 09/28/2015 postreply 17:29:42
• 那你想過沒有,如果出大才禍事故,你的車是違法的會怎麽樣? -soccer88- ♂ (0 bytes) () 09/28/2015 postreply 17:32:23
• 有幾次看到出車禍,你會專門去檢查一下sway bar的? -卵世佳人- ♂ (0 bytes) () 09/29/2015 postreply 18:06:12
• removing an optional component isn't illegal -堅茂- ♂ (0 bytes) () 09/28/2015 postreply 17:33:19
• 你自己讀一讀,是違法的,Airbag也是 Optional???;不和你浪費時間了 -soccer88- ♂ (0 bytes) () 09/28/2015 postreply 17:35:01
• i had paid extra to have it, now i have taken it off so it is ba -堅茂- ♂ (0 bytes) () 09/28/2015 postreply 17:37:11
• airbag is mandatory, please don't get confused -堅茂- ♂ (0 bytes) () 09/28/2015 postreply 17:38:23
• it is nice to have, but not required to have -堅茂- ♂ (0 bytes) () 09/28/2015 postreply 17:35:11
WENXUECITY.COM does not represent or guarantee the truthfulness, accuracy, or reliability of any of communications posted by other users.
Copyright ©1998-2024 wenxuecity.com All rights reserved. Privacy Statement & Terms of Use & User Privacy Protection Policy