沒有這個車會翻的,比你想象得要容易。一個小轉彎,路不平什麽的,你的車在60 MPH時基本就過去了,沒啥懸念。自己做個受力分析,60 MPH在轉彎半徑300米情況下可能沒事,在30 米半徑下一定翻。
http://bbs.wenxuecity.com/auto/426264.html
沒有這個車會翻的,比你想象得要容易。一個小轉彎,路不平什麽的,你的車在60 MPH時基本就過去了,沒啥懸念。自己做個受力分析,60 MPH在轉彎半徑300米情況下可能沒事,在30 米半徑下一定翻。
http://bbs.wenxuecity.com/auto/426264.html
•
謝謝版主,修車,真是技術活
-修車工-
♂
(0 bytes)
()
09/27/2015 postreply
19:35:58
•
這活其實極簡單。就是把這鐵棍給換了。youtube上看看,其實沒什麼麻煩的。
-vw308-
♂
(0 bytes)
()
09/28/2015 postreply
10:49:12
•
的確是,但是你看看鏈接,裏麵建議去了
-soccer88-
♂
(0 bytes)
()
09/28/2015 postreply
10:52:54
•
鏈接容易鏽蝕,你要卸下前,要噴些PB blaster,在轉螺絲時要先固定bolt.其它沒什麼。
-vw308-
♂
(0 bytes)
()
09/28/2015 postreply
12:34:09
•
記得一位同事騎自行車沒問題,騎三輪車就翻了。
-卵世佳人-
♂
(0 bytes)
()
09/28/2015 postreply
03:18:32
•
還好沒有試四輪的
-soccer88-
♂
(0 bytes)
()
09/28/2015 postreply
15:26:41
•
騎四輪的心態不一樣,估計沒有問題。兩輪到三輪過渡,台階不小。
-卵世佳人-
♂
(0 bytes)
()
09/28/2015 postreply
17:11:12
•
那是高速路速度了,不會有那樣的急轉彎吧。有,可就是謀殺了。
-needtime-
♂
(224 bytes)
()
09/28/2015 postreply
05:54:40
•
嘿嘿,急轉彎到處都是,這車要不按推薦限速開,跟自殺也沒啥區別。
-biglow-
♂
(0 bytes)
()
09/28/2015 postreply
06:49:22
•
幾種情況非常危險,
-soccer88-
♂
(74 bytes)
()
09/28/2015 postreply
09:04:56
•
Is it safe to drive without a sway bar
-needtime-
♂
(197 bytes)
()
09/28/2015 postreply
11:51:27
•
Do you see a vehicle turns over because of not having a sway bar
-卵世佳人-
♂
(0 bytes)
()
09/29/2015 postreply
17:57:10
•
這裏是原理anti-roll bar (anti-sway bar, sway bar, stabilizer bar)(ZT)
-soccer88-
♂
(57188 bytes)
()
09/28/2015 postreply
12:25:10
•
Removing it won't make the car unsafe to drive
-堅茂-
♂
(619 bytes)
()
09/28/2015 postreply
16:34:02
•
在很多州是違法的
-soccer88-
♂
(0 bytes)
()
09/28/2015 postreply
16:37:23
•
孤陋寡聞了,請舉證
-堅茂-
♂
(0 bytes)
()
09/28/2015 postreply
16:40:14
•
你的確是的
-soccer88-
♂
(926 bytes)
()
09/28/2015 postreply
16:46:48
•
UT州
-soccer88-
♂
(2622 bytes)
()
09/28/2015 postreply
16:49:39
•
你自己開日本車
-修車工-
♂
(179 bytes)
()
09/28/2015 postreply
16:57:06
•
most chinese do if you don't notice
-堅茂-
♂
(0 bytes)
()
09/28/2015 postreply
17:14:23
•
就聽說你一個
-soccer88-
♂
(0 bytes)
()
09/28/2015 postreply
17:22:37
•
你不是納悶為什麽問題總是關於日本車的維修?
-堅茂-
♂
(0 bytes)
()
09/28/2015 postreply
17:26:16
•
it is not unsafe in this context
-堅茂-
♂
(0 bytes)
()
09/28/2015 postreply
17:13:52
•
OK, 那為什麽還違法如果是“not unsafe ”,
-soccer88-
♂
(0 bytes)
()
09/28/2015 postreply
17:19:50
•
some states don't allow modifications
-堅茂-
♂
(0 bytes)
()
09/28/2015 postreply
17:24:28
•
在加拿大也是違法的
-soccer88-
♂
(0 bytes)
()
09/28/2015 postreply
17:25:23
•
the law prohibits any suspension modifciations including truck/s
-堅茂-
♂
(0 bytes)
()
09/28/2015 postreply
17:28:02
•
people do anyway, including changing to air suspension or back
-堅茂-
♂
(0 bytes)
()
09/28/2015 postreply
17:29:42
•
那你想過沒有,如果出大才禍事故,你的車是違法的會怎麽樣?
-soccer88-
♂
(0 bytes)
()
09/28/2015 postreply
17:32:23
•
有幾次看到出車禍,你會專門去檢查一下sway bar的?
-卵世佳人-
♂
(0 bytes)
()
09/29/2015 postreply
18:06:12
•
removing an optional component isn't illegal
-堅茂-
♂
(0 bytes)
()
09/28/2015 postreply
17:33:19
•
你自己讀一讀,是違法的,Airbag也是 Optional???;不和你浪費時間了
-soccer88-
♂
(0 bytes)
()
09/28/2015 postreply
17:35:01
•
i had paid extra to have it, now i have taken it off so it is ba
-堅茂-
♂
(0 bytes)
()
09/28/2015 postreply
17:37:11
•
airbag is mandatory, please don't get confused
-堅茂-
♂
(0 bytes)
()
09/28/2015 postreply
17:38:23
•
it is nice to have, but not required to have
-堅茂-
♂
(0 bytes)
()
09/28/2015 postreply
17:35:11
WENXUECITY.COM does not represent or guarantee the truthfulness, accuracy, or reliability of any of communications posted by other users.
Copyright ©1998-2025 wenxuecity.com All rights reserved. Privacy Statement & Terms of Use & User Privacy Protection Policy