《資治通鑒》評說

版權說明:歡迎非商業贏利目的轉載轉貼我的文章。轉載轉貼時請注明唵啊吽筆名和博客鏈接。
個人資料
唵啊吽 (熱門博主)
  • 博客訪問:
歸檔
正文

Is it possible for Europe to choose China over the USA?

(2024-07-17 14:15:18) 下一個

Q: Is it possible for Europe to choose China over the USA?

A:

It is not only possible but also should. Eurasia is one continent geographically. Europe as a continent power dominated for a thousand years in the Middle Ages. Sea power has become hegemony only in the past five hundred years. Why a tiny island of England could rule the whole world? Why the US with only a population half of that of Europe can rule the world? It is the divide-and-conquer strategy. A divided Eurasia is what the US needs to maintain its hegemony.

Why did the US keep pushing NATO eastward? It is not to protect Europe. It is to prevent Eurasia from becoming peaceful and prosperous. A peaceful and prosperous Eurasia will revitalize Europe as a continent power and end the sea power’s hegemony.

The Divide-and-conquer strategy worked for Britain specifically fueling conflicts between Germany and France. Britain supported Germany when France was strong and supported France when Germany was strong. This strategy of divide-and-conquer has another name: balance of power.

By pushing NATO the military alliance eastward to such a limit that incited the Ukraine War. This tactic is not to protect Europe but to weaken Europe. If Russia becomes part of the EU, then Europe is an economy larger than the US and a power with nuclear capability on par with the US. That’s not what the US wants.

Does Europe want peace? NATO cannot give Europe peace as Europe has had the Kosovo War and the Ukraine War. NATO has Europe involved deeply in the wars.

Does Europe want economic prosperity? When NATO dragged Europe into wars, one after another, again and again, the European economy could only be weaker and weaker. The Eurozone was an economy larger than the US at the beginning. After the Kosovo War and now the Ukraine War, the European economy becomes only a fraction of that of the US. We observe that all the wars NATO is involved in are not near the US territory. Wars near or in Europe weaken Europe. Bombing Libya and the Arab Spring gave Europe the headache of a refugee crisis that made Europe's society unstable and weakened the power of Europe.

Choosing China and supporting BRI will bring Europe peace and prosperity. Choosing China is choosing peace and prosperity. A peaceful and prosperous Eurasia is morally more favorable than wars and economic stagnation. NATO is a geopolitical tool implementing the Divide-and-conquer strategy of the US, pushing Europe into wars and chaos.

Choosing China and Europe can become one pole in the multi-polar world order. Choosing China will build an international community of a shared future for mankind.

Mankind evolved. Mankind can evolve to progress. Mankind can get rid of wars and hunger through progress. Europe can make progress by choosing China.

[ 打印 ]
閱讀 ()評論 (0)
評論
目前還沒有任何評論
登錄後才可評論.