最新文章
文章分類
歸檔
2006 (217)
2007 (225)
2008 (142)
2010 (96)
2011 (174)
2013 (239)
2014 (120)
2017 (1)
2023 (348)
正文
太祖說：利用小說反黨是一大發明。如今，悲情竟然已經成為一種地緣政治資源，而且是被西方輿論壟斷的資源。這個資源的運用，成為西方戰爭動員能力的重要組成部分。伊拉克人民在薩達姆統治下的悲情為美國伊拉克戰爭動員了國內外政治資源，而美國占領伊拉克以後的伊拉克人的更大的悲情則被西方媒體刻意抹殺。科索沃悲情是西方打擊塞爾維亞的資源。車臣悲情原來被北約用來遏製俄國，結果黑寡婦恐怖事件讓俄國把悲情拿來反對車臣了。2008拉薩烏魯木齊中國人民被恐怖事件傷害的悲情被西方歪曲成西藏“國”和新疆“國”受中國“壓迫”的悲情。悲情，是西方戰爭動員力的資源之一。
人都有惻隱之心，對於困難的弱者都或多或少地注以同情。於是，西方就按照地緣政治需要有選擇地渲染自身陣營裏的悲情而掩蓋對手的曆史悲情。西方媒體的政治正確跟風行為是很明顯的，如阿富汗總統卡賽是美國的盟友，備受媒體鼓勵打氣，批評也是建設性的正麵批評。不料卡賽詬病西方幹預阿富汗選舉後，霎時間西方媒體來了個180度大轉彎，大肆爆料卡賽政府腐敗黑暗。這充分暴露出西方所謂“媒體自由”的“民主社會基礎”隻不過是地緣政治的輿論機器，在“政治正確”主導下歪曲現實報道，這種為地緣政治服務的西方輿論機器中國人在2008年領教很深了，隻是西方輿論機器依然故我，如今天在報道青海玉樹地震的時候，依然用春秋筆法渲染藏民受中國壓迫的“曆史”和“現實”，把天災的悲情偷梁換柱成“漢人壓迫藏民”的悲情，而海地地震西方壓榨海地的悲情則被扭為天災悲情。以下隻舉西方主導的主流媒體如何渲染和隱瞞悲情來配合其地緣政治需要。
1、猶太人的悲情。猶太人在二戰被希特勒屠殺是曆史悲劇。人類不應該忘記這個曆史悲劇。但是，如今猶太人悲情已經成為猶太人重新製造類似的曆史悲劇的通行證了。雖然美以主張巴以和平要分出以色列和巴勒斯坦兩個國家的解決方案，但是，如今並不存在巴勒斯坦國家，巴勒斯坦作為主權國家並不存在，聯合國成員國裏沒有巴勒斯坦國，各國沒有駐巴勒斯坦國的外交領事館大使館。換言之，以色列國內的西岸和加沙地帶是以色列國內的種族隔離區，和二戰期間德國占領波蘭後建立的猶太人隔離村是一樣的。巴勒斯坦難民的當今世界最大的難民營。聯合國統計全球難民巴勒斯坦是第一位。然而，西方媒體可以渲染達富爾難民的悲情，絕不渲染巴勒斯坦難民悲情。他們讚美美國黑人反對種族隔離和南非反對種族隔離的非暴力運動時渲染種族隔離悲情和普世價值的“人權”，但是，對以色列違反人權地種族隔離政策卻視而不見，並且大力渲染二戰猶太人的悲情。每年紀念二戰，猶太人悲情就被渲染一次，而二戰中國的災難，如典型的南京大屠殺，則年年在二戰紀念中被忽略，偶有提到就帶上日本教科書之類的質疑。當年南京上海外國列強租界裏西方是見證了日本屠殺中國，見證了日本入侵是中國難民的悲慘狀況，可是每年二戰紀念隻聽到猶太人悲情，聽不到中國悲情。當年被日寇屠殺的大多數是平民百姓，並非共產黨，之因為他們死是中國人，在國際地緣政治中不配有悲情。
2、薩達姆種族滅絕最，罪狀是屠殺了百來號人的村莊。當年西方殖民屠殺了多數村莊，有曆史資料記錄但沒有媒體悲情紀念。當年日本在中國屠殺了多數村莊？留下多數萬人坑？每年國際上紀念二戰都沒有媒體為中國二戰苦難悲情，以至如今西方民眾不知中國二戰是反法西斯國家，現在西方民眾反倒認為中國是法西斯國家，日本是民主良民。顛倒黑白。舉一個小例子，當年日本入侵廣州從三灶島機場起飛轟炸廣州，日本建三灶島機場時把三灶島的中國人都屠殺了。全國各地都有這些日本暴行的記錄，可惜，西方民眾可以數出一個一個的猶太人集中營，卻不知道日本占領中國的暴行比希特勒有過之無不及，每個三灶島慘案都和薩達姆罪行一樣嚴重，日本在中國製造了成千的薩達姆罪行。
3、塞爾維亞種族滅絕科索沃阿爾巴尼亞族。被國際法庭審判。而98年印尼針對華裔的暴行其規模和殘忍手段是塞爾維亞的百倍。印尼針對華裔種族滅絕的暴行不下於非洲索馬裏和達富爾等慘案，是在印尼曆史上反複發生的慘案。可是，一向關懷“人權”的西方媒體對印尼慘案隻是例行公事地報道一下就沒有聲音了。為什麽？印尼又不是中國，為什麽？隻因為受難的是華裔。報道華裔悲情不符合地緣政治需要。美國黑人奴隸的悲情有了，美國修建跨大陸鐵路的華工的悲情被掩蓋了。美國不是民主人權了嗎？何以曆史教育對黑人和華裔要區別對待？跨大陸鐵路是美國工業革命的基礎設施，是華裔血汗屍骨建設出來的，是美國現代化的關鍵曆史事件。沒有悲情，隻有曆史書上幹巴巴的學生不想記的一些文字。華裔的悲情是要被西方主流媒體掩蓋的，是為了地緣政治要從人們的記憶中被模掉的。曆史上違反人權的事情很多，都可以渲染強化，唯有華裔的悲情要從曆史書中抹掉，因為華裔的悲情有礙美國地緣政治的輿論導向。
4、馬丁路德金、曼德拉、甘地是被西方熱捧的非暴力運動的典型，因為他們是弱勢群體，是被壓迫群體。而達賴也進入了這個典型的行列中，成西方今天鮮活鮮活的非暴力典型。可是，達賴在當年西藏是貴族僧侶的領袖，是社會的強勢貴族，是暴力壓迫了百萬農奴，完全是甘地之類的對立麵。而且他是以武裝暴力叛亂來抗拒和平的非暴力的民主改革，西媒顛倒黑白莫過於此。在西方的海外學子們，你們不妨隨便問一問身邊的西方人，他們都會說達賴是受中國壓迫的，是被暴力壓迫的和平主義者和非暴力運動領袖。奇怪吧。貴族武裝叛亂失敗成了悲情，百萬農奴長期的困難不是悲情。百萬農奴比美國黑人還悲慘，他們受到活剝皮的酷刑，但是，他們在西方地緣政治輿論下不配有悲情。
5、卡廷慘案。兩國交兵，波蘭屠殺十萬紅軍不分官兵，蘇聯屠殺兩萬軍官而釋放了士兵。結果西方記住了卡廷悲情。而且這幾天卡廷悲情發揮到頂峰。屠殺俘虜是不對的。中國人們誌願軍在朝鮮戰場上優待俘虜，結果呢，俘虜回去講了中國優待俘虜的情況以後呢，西方說這些人被“洗腦”了，吧中國描畫成會洗腦的惡魔。比卡廷選擇性悲情更為嚴重的，當然是日寇占領中國的三光政策，人不分男女老幼一律屠殺，比起蘇聯隻殺軍官嚴重多了。南京慘案，在每年國際紀念二戰時都把地緣政治掩蓋掉，而日本政界竟然可以煌而堂之地參拜神社祭奠戰犯。西方雖然沒有像卡廷慘案那樣渲染戰犯的悲情，畢竟日本還轟炸了珍珠港，在廣島長崎挨了兩顆原子彈。但西方媒體畢竟也沒有譴責這種為戰犯招魂的日本悲情，他們太熱衷於渲染中國軍事“強大”的“侵略性”而不在乎日本渲染戰犯悲情。如果不是珍珠港和廣島長崎，我想西方各國政要也會和日本天皇一起為戰犯悲情一番的，有如今天西方各國政要要參加波蘭總統遇難喪禮一樣。日本的武士道就是他們的輝煌曆史，正如今天我們依然可以在西方圖書館裏讀到英國輝煌的鴉片戰爭曆史一樣。昨天想看看東印度公司的資料，圖書館一本很權威的書題目是《榮耀的東印度公司》。東印度公司在印度擁有自己的軍隊，實際統治了印度，種植鴉片走私到中國，為大英帝國立下汗馬功勞，所以有榮耀。殖民地人民的苦難是不配有悲情的，悲情屬於地緣政治中西方壟斷的輿論資源。
西方媒體刻意清洗華裔曆史和現實的悲情是為隨時發動對華戰爭埋下的伏筆。當年海南島間諜機事件，美國媒體為13個間諜發悲情，把13個間諜塑造成美國在伊朗受難的人質一樣，隻要美國政府振臂一呼，全美國人民可以一夜之間就全力支持對華戰爭。美國60％的海軍集中在沒有戰事的太平洋西部，依然有能力在認何時候以任何借口對華發動戰爭而得到美國人民和其盟國人民一致支持，因為西方媒體的悲情運作已經為西方對華戰爭做好了長期的仇恨情緒灌輸。
製造了南京大屠殺慘案真正元凶為何逍遙法外?(圖)
人都有惻隱之心，對於困難的弱者都或多或少地注以同情。於是，西方就按照地緣政治需要有選擇地渲染自身陣營裏的悲情而掩蓋對手的曆史悲情。西方媒體的政治正確跟風行為是很明顯的，如阿富汗總統卡賽是美國的盟友，備受媒體鼓勵打氣，批評也是建設性的正麵批評。不料卡賽詬病西方幹預阿富汗選舉後，霎時間西方媒體來了個180度大轉彎，大肆爆料卡賽政府腐敗黑暗。這充分暴露出西方所謂“媒體自由”的“民主社會基礎”隻不過是地緣政治的輿論機器，在“政治正確”主導下歪曲現實報道，這種為地緣政治服務的西方輿論機器中國人在2008年領教很深了，隻是西方輿論機器依然故我，如今天在報道青海玉樹地震的時候，依然用春秋筆法渲染藏民受中國壓迫的“曆史”和“現實”，把天災的悲情偷梁換柱成“漢人壓迫藏民”的悲情，而海地地震西方壓榨海地的悲情則被扭為天災悲情。以下隻舉西方主導的主流媒體如何渲染和隱瞞悲情來配合其地緣政治需要。
1、猶太人的悲情。猶太人在二戰被希特勒屠殺是曆史悲劇。人類不應該忘記這個曆史悲劇。但是，如今猶太人悲情已經成為猶太人重新製造類似的曆史悲劇的通行證了。雖然美以主張巴以和平要分出以色列和巴勒斯坦兩個國家的解決方案，但是，如今並不存在巴勒斯坦國家，巴勒斯坦作為主權國家並不存在，聯合國成員國裏沒有巴勒斯坦國，各國沒有駐巴勒斯坦國的外交領事館大使館。換言之，以色列國內的西岸和加沙地帶是以色列國內的種族隔離區，和二戰期間德國占領波蘭後建立的猶太人隔離村是一樣的。巴勒斯坦難民的當今世界最大的難民營。聯合國統計全球難民巴勒斯坦是第一位。然而，西方媒體可以渲染達富爾難民的悲情，絕不渲染巴勒斯坦難民悲情。他們讚美美國黑人反對種族隔離和南非反對種族隔離的非暴力運動時渲染種族隔離悲情和普世價值的“人權”，但是，對以色列違反人權地種族隔離政策卻視而不見，並且大力渲染二戰猶太人的悲情。每年紀念二戰，猶太人悲情就被渲染一次，而二戰中國的災難，如典型的南京大屠殺，則年年在二戰紀念中被忽略，偶有提到就帶上日本教科書之類的質疑。當年南京上海外國列強租界裏西方是見證了日本屠殺中國，見證了日本入侵是中國難民的悲慘狀況，可是每年二戰紀念隻聽到猶太人悲情，聽不到中國悲情。當年被日寇屠殺的大多數是平民百姓，並非共產黨，之因為他們死是中國人，在國際地緣政治中不配有悲情。
2、薩達姆種族滅絕最，罪狀是屠殺了百來號人的村莊。當年西方殖民屠殺了多數村莊，有曆史資料記錄但沒有媒體悲情紀念。當年日本在中國屠殺了多數村莊？留下多數萬人坑？每年國際上紀念二戰都沒有媒體為中國二戰苦難悲情，以至如今西方民眾不知中國二戰是反法西斯國家，現在西方民眾反倒認為中國是法西斯國家，日本是民主良民。顛倒黑白。舉一個小例子，當年日本入侵廣州從三灶島機場起飛轟炸廣州，日本建三灶島機場時把三灶島的中國人都屠殺了。全國各地都有這些日本暴行的記錄，可惜，西方民眾可以數出一個一個的猶太人集中營，卻不知道日本占領中國的暴行比希特勒有過之無不及，每個三灶島慘案都和薩達姆罪行一樣嚴重，日本在中國製造了成千的薩達姆罪行。
3、塞爾維亞種族滅絕科索沃阿爾巴尼亞族。被國際法庭審判。而98年印尼針對華裔的暴行其規模和殘忍手段是塞爾維亞的百倍。印尼針對華裔種族滅絕的暴行不下於非洲索馬裏和達富爾等慘案，是在印尼曆史上反複發生的慘案。可是，一向關懷“人權”的西方媒體對印尼慘案隻是例行公事地報道一下就沒有聲音了。為什麽？印尼又不是中國，為什麽？隻因為受難的是華裔。報道華裔悲情不符合地緣政治需要。美國黑人奴隸的悲情有了，美國修建跨大陸鐵路的華工的悲情被掩蓋了。美國不是民主人權了嗎？何以曆史教育對黑人和華裔要區別對待？跨大陸鐵路是美國工業革命的基礎設施，是華裔血汗屍骨建設出來的，是美國現代化的關鍵曆史事件。沒有悲情，隻有曆史書上幹巴巴的學生不想記的一些文字。華裔的悲情是要被西方主流媒體掩蓋的，是為了地緣政治要從人們的記憶中被模掉的。曆史上違反人權的事情很多，都可以渲染強化，唯有華裔的悲情要從曆史書中抹掉，因為華裔的悲情有礙美國地緣政治的輿論導向。
4、馬丁路德金、曼德拉、甘地是被西方熱捧的非暴力運動的典型，因為他們是弱勢群體，是被壓迫群體。而達賴也進入了這個典型的行列中，成西方今天鮮活鮮活的非暴力典型。可是，達賴在當年西藏是貴族僧侶的領袖，是社會的強勢貴族，是暴力壓迫了百萬農奴，完全是甘地之類的對立麵。而且他是以武裝暴力叛亂來抗拒和平的非暴力的民主改革，西媒顛倒黑白莫過於此。在西方的海外學子們，你們不妨隨便問一問身邊的西方人，他們都會說達賴是受中國壓迫的，是被暴力壓迫的和平主義者和非暴力運動領袖。奇怪吧。貴族武裝叛亂失敗成了悲情，百萬農奴長期的困難不是悲情。百萬農奴比美國黑人還悲慘，他們受到活剝皮的酷刑，但是，他們在西方地緣政治輿論下不配有悲情。
5、卡廷慘案。兩國交兵，波蘭屠殺十萬紅軍不分官兵，蘇聯屠殺兩萬軍官而釋放了士兵。結果西方記住了卡廷悲情。而且這幾天卡廷悲情發揮到頂峰。屠殺俘虜是不對的。中國人們誌願軍在朝鮮戰場上優待俘虜，結果呢，俘虜回去講了中國優待俘虜的情況以後呢，西方說這些人被“洗腦”了，吧中國描畫成會洗腦的惡魔。比卡廷選擇性悲情更為嚴重的，當然是日寇占領中國的三光政策，人不分男女老幼一律屠殺，比起蘇聯隻殺軍官嚴重多了。南京慘案，在每年國際紀念二戰時都把地緣政治掩蓋掉，而日本政界竟然可以煌而堂之地參拜神社祭奠戰犯。西方雖然沒有像卡廷慘案那樣渲染戰犯的悲情，畢竟日本還轟炸了珍珠港，在廣島長崎挨了兩顆原子彈。但西方媒體畢竟也沒有譴責這種為戰犯招魂的日本悲情，他們太熱衷於渲染中國軍事“強大”的“侵略性”而不在乎日本渲染戰犯悲情。如果不是珍珠港和廣島長崎，我想西方各國政要也會和日本天皇一起為戰犯悲情一番的，有如今天西方各國政要要參加波蘭總統遇難喪禮一樣。日本的武士道就是他們的輝煌曆史，正如今天我們依然可以在西方圖書館裏讀到英國輝煌的鴉片戰爭曆史一樣。昨天想看看東印度公司的資料，圖書館一本很權威的書題目是《榮耀的東印度公司》。東印度公司在印度擁有自己的軍隊，實際統治了印度，種植鴉片走私到中國，為大英帝國立下汗馬功勞，所以有榮耀。殖民地人民的苦難是不配有悲情的，悲情屬於地緣政治中西方壟斷的輿論資源。
西方媒體刻意清洗華裔曆史和現實的悲情是為隨時發動對華戰爭埋下的伏筆。當年海南島間諜機事件，美國媒體為13個間諜發悲情，把13個間諜塑造成美國在伊朗受難的人質一樣，隻要美國政府振臂一呼，全美國人民可以一夜之間就全力支持對華戰爭。美國60％的海軍集中在沒有戰事的太平洋西部，依然有能力在認何時候以任何借口對華發動戰爭而得到美國人民和其盟國人民一致支持，因為西方媒體的悲情運作已經為西方對華戰爭做好了長期的仇恨情緒灌輸。
製造了南京大屠殺慘案真正元凶為何逍遙法外?(圖)
I do not agree your arguments. It was true many people died during Cultural Revolution and I agree Communist government was responsible for that. Chinese people and Communist China have all admitted that. Just like every year many people died of gun crime in US. US people and government admit the fact and everybody know that it’s the reasonability of US government to reduce the gun crimes. When you said Communist China kills more people than Nanking massacre, however, is just the same as to said that democratic America kills more American than 911 attract, as every year about 10 thousands of American was killed in gun crimes.
The difference between Culture Revelation as well as three years of disaster and Nanking massacre is just the same as between US gun crimes and 911. One is due to social instability and government policies, and other is due to foreign invasion. During Culture Revolution, the death rate is much higher for government officials and CCP officials than the rate in other group. When you said communist China kills more people than Nanking massacre is just like to say Democratic America is killing more America than 911. During three years of disaster, many poor Chinese died of hunger, Chinese people know that, and Chinese government know that, and they all know something is not correct, just like US people know that so many gun crimes in US is not correct. There are more poor people died in three years of disaster than government officials is just like there are more poor people fall as gun crimes victims in US. There must be some communists died during three years of disasters, and many who died have relatives as communists. As you know, during civil war in China, it was the most poor who joint the Communist Party. And 1959 was only 10 year after civil war and majority of Chinese population was still in countryside. At that time, most of government and party officials were come from the countryside and come from poor families. If you really want to say someone intentionally killed Chinese people during 1959-1961 and Cultural Revolution, then it should be United States and Soviet Union. They succeed in putting economic sanction on China, which led to humanitarian disasters indirectly.
Communist China is bad. Chinese know it. But Chinese are not foolish enough to overthrow it, as they know that the present China is still the best among all other forms of governments they tried since Opium War. Since Opium War, Chinese tried democracy under Sun Yet-sent but all the Western countries just support local war lords in China to extent their state interest at the expense of Chinese democracy and at the expense of Chinese people. That’s why Dr. Sun turned to Soviet and welcomed Communist in China.
In the last a few decades, poverty population reduced all over the world, and China made the number one contribution. Many poor peasants of yesterday are now rich entrepreneurs in China, thanks to market economy adapted by Communist China. Regardless your label of China as communist or capitalist, the present China works for the better of Chinese and the world.
Also, I am not satisfied by your answer. I am asking the name who was responsible for Nanking massacre as people name Hitler for the responsibility of massacre of Jews. You should name Shōwa for the responsibility of Naking massacre. Every year, when people condemn the massacre of Jews during WWII they condemn Hitler. Hitler is notorious all over the world, while the emperor family of Japan who is responsible for Nanking massacre is still enjoying inherited high social privilege. It is against all the human morality. I believe man should be born equal and inherited social privileges should be discarded. Especially the one who is responsible for the Nanking massacre.
(1): Exact opposite to your presumption, here's what I am really asking:
GCD caused far more deaths of the Chinese people than the Japanese. So, please answer me: why don't you think the GCD should be responsible for its actions?
(2): Are you asking me who was responsible for the Nanking massacre? Of course it's the Japanese government! (Do you not know that? Are you really Chinese?)
(3): Sorry but I do admit that I don't know very many Chinese "surfer" or the "surfering" that they do. Surfing looks fun although I've never tried it. If you know so much about surfing since the opium war, you are welcome to write an article about it too.
(If there's something you want to say, why don't you say it in Chinese. I can read and understand it.)
I can see where you are heading to. What you imply is that Chinese was beeter off by living under Japanese occupation than living in Communist China.What I can say is that you are out of touch with reality.
By the way, you still cannot name the one who was responsible for Naking Massacre, despite that you cited so many Western Media reports.
Come on, say it. I would also like to hear from you who is reaponsible for the surfering of Chinese since Opium War and before Communist ever come into China, from the West!
(2): On the other hand, many of the ones who starved during the Great Leap Forward were not party members. Mind you, more Chinese people died during 1958-1961 than during the Nanking massacre.
(3): If you don't even care about the death of your own people, why should the western media care?
(4): On the other hand, the western media is aware of the sacrifices of the Chinese people. Take Nanking massacre, for example. There is an abundance of western media reporting on it. I would suggest you to first look at the following before claiming "western media did not report":
From Times:
http://www.timesonline.co.uk/tol/system/topicRoot/The_Rape_of_Nanking/
From BBC:
http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/asia-pacific/7140357.stm
From Newsweek:
http://www.newsweek.com/id/97533
A film on Nanking massacre, made and directed by Americans:
http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0893356/
Here's another one:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YoW2WYdOsvg
(5): "the sacrifice Chinese people made during II World War and the surfers Chinese endured since opium war." ?
I will admit that I do not know much about the "surfers" that the Chinese had to endure since opium war. I will agree with you and presume that they surfed really poorly.
Your statement of "The communist China itself killed millions and millions of its own people, first in 1958-1961, and then 1966-1976." omits something too. You should say that the communist China itself killed millions of communists during 1966-1976.
But thanks for ask me to add another example: When the western media loves to talk about the humanity disasters during 1958-1961 and 1967-1976 in China, they are unwilling to mention the sacrifice Chinese people made during II World War and the surfers Chinese endured since opium war.
Your second point is just confused yourself and readers. My article is talking media, and you change it to government. Just because U.S. congress passed a resolution to condemn Japan for the Nanking massacre doesn’t mean the media will talk about it. In fact, the media may distort the reality to the opposite. For example, U.S. government state several times that Taiwan and Tibet are part of China, while media create a impression that Taiwan and Tibet are separate countries from China. Yes, U.S. congress passed a resolution to condemn Japan for the Nanking massacre, but how many time it mention Nanking massacre when condemning Fascists brutal acts during II world war? Mostly they just condemn Hitler. We all know Hitler is bad for killing Jewish people, but how many people know the name who is responsible for Nanking massacre just like people know Hitler when taking about Jewish’s misery? Can you tell me the name who is responsible for Nanking massacre?
You seem to have forgotten the fact that the "China" back then was overtaken by the communist "China" later. The communist China itself killed millions and millions of its own people, first in 1958-1961, and then 1966-1976. I don't see that being remembered in your articles either.
Not to mention, you also seem to have forgotten that the U.S. congress passed a resolution to condemn Japan for the Nanking massacre. Your allegation against the West for neglecting the suffering of the Chinese is not supported by clear evidence to the contrary.