個人資料
正文

卡尼在議會否決波利耶夫推動美式保釋法的提案

(2025-10-03 16:28:06) 下一個

卡尼在議會否決波利耶夫推動美式保釋法的提案

今日加拿大 2025年10月3日
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ore3DwSb9a8

總理馬克·卡尼與反對黨領袖皮埃爾·波利耶夫就加拿大保釋改革問題發生激烈衝突,下議院再次爆發激烈辯論。波利耶夫指責自由黨政府維持“自由保釋”製度,指責其釋放慣犯,並援引悲劇案例要求改革。

但卡尼予以強烈反擊,明確表示政府正在推行全麵的保釋改革——該改革是與各省、地區和執法部門協商後製定的。最重要的是,卡尼在辯論中說出了關鍵的一句話:“這不是基於複製粘貼的美國保釋法。這是一部行之有效的加拿大法律。”

這場激烈的交鋒揭示了人們對加拿大司法體係截然不同的看法。波利耶夫的立場傾向於美國式的“嚴厲打擊犯罪”政策,而卡尼則堅持加拿大自主研發的、以證據為基礎的改革,在安全與權利之間取得平衡。

在本視頻中,《今日加拿大》將為您帶來完整的對話和深入分析。這會是加拿大司法辯論的轉折點嗎?還是議會持續不斷的口水戰中又一次爆發?

敬請關注並訂閱《今日加拿大》,獲取更多突發政治分析和塑造加拿大未來的故事。

總理馬克·卡尼與皮埃爾·波利耶夫在下議院就加拿大保釋改革展開激烈辯論,卡尼因否決美國式保釋法和所謂的“特朗普式司法”而成為頭條新聞。在質詢環節,波利耶夫抨擊自由黨的保釋政策,聲稱這些政策讓慣犯逍遙法外,而卡尼則為其基於證據、磋商和加拿大法律的全麵保釋改革計劃辯護。卡尼強調加拿大不需要照搬美國的解決方案,並堅稱加拿大司法係統必須保持公正、嚴厲打擊犯罪並保障人權。這場激烈的政治衝突凸顯了卡尼的領導地位與波利耶夫的批評立場之間的巨大分歧,為加拿大2025政治決戰埋下了伏筆。
<<<<<<<<<<<<>>>>>>>>>>
議會昨天再次爆發衝突。這次的爭論並非因為赤字,也不是因為就業,而是因為犯罪和保釋改革。
皮埃爾·波利亞夫猛烈抨擊馬克·卡尼和自由黨政府,用他所謂的“自由保釋”製度將危險罪犯囚禁在街頭。他將此描述為一場國家危機,並援引一些悲慘的新聞頭條,要求卡尼徹底廢除該製度。但接下來發生的事情卻顛覆了劇本。卡尼不僅捍衛了他的改革,還發出了尖銳的譴責,明確表示加拿大的司法係統不會受製於美國。
卡尼宣稱,這並非基於美國保釋法的複製粘貼。這是一部
行之有效的加拿大法律。這條界線或許將成為決定性時刻。為什麽?
因為它將兩種截然不同的願景劃清界限。卡尼提出的加拿大優先、基於證據的改革方案,與波利亞夫借鑒美國的複製粘貼方案。議長先生,犯罪受害者並不希望總理同情他們。他們想知道他為何違背了
承諾。他們想知道為什麽自由派保釋製度仍然存在,允許
同一批慣犯一次又一次地犯罪。過去幾天,在魁北克省聖傑羅姆,
一具女子的屍體被發現,被她的伴侶殺害,而她的伴侶此前曾被捕30次,
但最終以自由派保釋製度獲釋。
難以置信。總理最終會廢除
自由派保釋製度嗎?或者更好的是,他應該走開,讓我們自己來處理這些事情?
尊敬的總理。
議長先生,本屆政府正在推進
全麵的保釋改革。這項
全麵的保釋改革基於
與各省和地區的廣泛磋商。它基於
與執法部門的廣泛討論。它基於證據。它
並非基於複製粘貼的美國保釋法。這是一部行之有效的保釋法。
我們嚴厲打擊犯罪,並堅定維護加拿大人的權利。
要理解為何這場對話如此重要,
我們必須先回顧一下。幾個月來,PolyAV
一直在強調保釋問題,認為
慣犯逍遙法外,犯罪率
不斷上升,加拿大人的安全感下降。
這是一個強有力的論點,因為它指向了真實的悲劇。
但如果你仔細觀察,就會發現他的解決方案
並非真正的加拿大式方案。它們隻是效仿了
美國嚴厲的犯罪法律。
諷刺之處在於此。美國的保釋製度
是世界上最受詬病的製度之一。它帶有懲罰性,導致監獄裏擠滿了那些根本付不起保釋金的低風險罪犯。
而且,它對貧困和邊緣群體的懲罰過重,卻沒有讓社區變得更安全。這些正是加拿大幾十年來一直試圖避免的問題。卡尼在拒絕這種模式時,很清楚自己在做什麽。他大肆批判美國保釋法的照搬,揭露了保守黨的方案是“外來政策”。

卡尼在議會否決波利耶夫推動美式保釋法的提案

今日加拿大 2025年10月3日
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ore3DwSb9a8

總理馬克·卡尼與反對黨領袖皮埃爾·波利耶夫就加拿大保釋改革問題發生激烈衝突,下議院再次爆發激烈辯論。波利耶夫指責自由黨政府維持“自由保釋”製度,指責其釋放慣犯,並援引悲劇案例要求改革。

但卡尼予以強烈反擊,明確表示政府正在推行全麵的保釋改革——該改革是與各省、地區和執法部門協商後製定的。最重要的是,卡尼在辯論中說出了關鍵的一句話:“這不是基於複製粘貼的美國保釋法。這是一部行之有效的加拿大法律。”

這場激烈的交鋒揭示了人們對加拿大司法體係截然不同的看法。波利耶夫的立場傾向於美國式的“嚴厲打擊犯罪”政策,而卡尼則堅持加拿大自主研發的、以證據為基礎的改革,在安全與權利之間取得平衡。

在本視頻中,《今日加拿大》將為您帶來完整的對話和深入分析。這會是加拿大司法辯論的轉折點嗎?還是議會持續不斷的口水戰中又一次爆發?

敬請關注並訂閱《今日加拿大》,獲取更多突發政治分析和塑造加拿大未來的故事。

總理馬克·卡尼與皮埃爾·波利耶夫在下議院就加拿大保釋改革展開激烈辯論,卡尼因否決美國式保釋法和所謂的“特朗普式司法”而成為頭條新聞。在質詢環節,波利耶夫抨擊自由黨的保釋政策,聲稱這些政策讓慣犯逍遙法外,而卡尼則為其基於證據、磋商和加拿大法律的全麵保釋改革計劃辯護。卡尼強調加拿大不需要照搬美國的解決方案,並堅稱加拿大司法係統必須保持公正、嚴厲打擊犯罪並保障人權。這場激烈的政治衝突凸顯了卡尼的領導地位與波利耶夫的批評立場之間的巨大分歧,為加拿大2025政治決戰埋下了伏筆。
<<<<<<<<<<<<>>>>>>>>>>
議會昨天再次爆發衝突。這次的爭論並非因為赤字,也不是因為就業,而是因為犯罪和保釋改革。
皮埃爾·波利亞夫猛烈抨擊馬克·卡尼和自由黨政府,用他所謂的“自由保釋”製度將危險罪犯囚禁在街頭。他將此描述為一場國家危機,並援引一些悲慘的新聞頭條,要求卡尼徹底廢除該製度。但接下來發生的事情卻顛覆了劇本。卡尼不僅捍衛了他的改革,還發出了尖銳的譴責,明確表示加拿大的司法係統不會受製於美國。
卡尼宣稱,這並非基於美國保釋法的複製粘貼。這是一部
行之有效的加拿大法律。這條界線或許將成為決定性時刻。為什麽?
因為它將兩種截然不同的願景劃清界限。卡尼提出的加拿大優先、基於證據的改革方案,與波利亞夫借鑒美國的複製粘貼方案。議長先生,犯罪受害者並不希望總理同情他們。他們想知道他為何違背了
承諾。他們想知道為什麽自由派保釋製度仍然存在,允許
同一批慣犯一次又一次地犯罪。過去幾天,在魁北克省聖傑羅姆,
一具女子的屍體被發現,被她的伴侶殺害,而她的伴侶此前曾被捕30次,
但最終以自由派保釋製度獲釋。
難以置信。總理最終會廢除
自由派保釋製度嗎?或者更好的是,他應該走開,讓我們自己來處理這些事情?
尊敬的總理。
議長先生,本屆政府正在推進
全麵的保釋改革。這項
全麵的保釋改革基於
與各省和地區的廣泛磋商。它基於
與執法部門的廣泛討論。它基於證據。它
並非基於複製粘貼的美國保釋法。這是一部行之有效的保釋法。
我們嚴厲打擊犯罪,並堅定維護加拿大人的權利。
要理解為何這場對話如此重要,
我們必須先回顧一下。幾個月來,PolyAV
一直在強調保釋問題,認為
慣犯逍遙法外,犯罪率
不斷上升,加拿大人的安全感下降。
這是一個強有力的論點,因為它指向了真實的悲劇。
但如果你仔細觀察,就會發現他的解決方案
並非真正的加拿大式方案。它們隻是效仿了
美國嚴厲的犯罪法律。
諷刺之處在於此。美國的保釋製度
是世界上最受詬病的製度之一。它帶有懲罰性,導致監獄裏擠滿了那些根本付不起保釋金的低風險罪犯。
而且,它對貧困和邊緣群體的懲罰過重,卻沒有讓社區變得更安全。這些正是加拿大幾十年來一直試圖避免的問題。卡尼在拒絕這種模式時,很清楚自己在做什麽。他大肆批判美國保釋法的照搬,揭露了保守黨的方案是“外來政策”。

Carney SHUTS DOWN Poilievre’s Push for U.S.-Style Law in Parliament

Canada Today 2025年10月3日
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ore3DwSb9a8 

Another heated debate shook the House of Commons as Prime Minister Mark Carney clashed with Opposition Leader Pierre Poilievre over Canada’s bail reform. Poilievre accused the Liberal government of keeping “liberal bail” in place, blaming it for releasing repeat offenders and citing tragic cases to demand change.

But Carney hit back hard, making it clear that the government is bringing comprehensive bail reform—crafted in consultation with provinces, territories, and law enforcement. Most importantly, Carney delivered the defining line of the debate: “This is not based on cut-and-paste American bail laws. This is a Canadian law that works.”

This fiery exchange revealed two very different visions for Canada’s justice system. Poilievre’s approach leans toward U.S.-style “tough on crime” policies, while Carney insists on Canadian-made, evidence-based reforms that balance safety with rights.

In this video, Canada Today brings you the full exchange and our in-depth analysis. Is this the turning point in Canada’s justice debate? Or just another clash in Parliament’s ongoing war of words?

Stay tuned and subscribe to Canada Today for more breaking political analysis and the stories shaping Canada’s future.

Prime Minister Mark Carney clashed with Pierre Poilievre in a fiery House of Commons debate over Canadian bail reform, with Carney making headlines by rejecting U.S. style bail laws and so-called Trump style justice. During Question Period, Poilievre attacked Liberal bail policies, claiming they let repeat offenders walk free, but Carney defended his plan for comprehensive bail reform based on evidence, consultations, and Canadian law. Emphasizing that Canada does not need copy-paste American solutions, Carney insisted that the Canadian justice system must remain fair, tough on crime, and protective of rights. This dramatic political clash highlighted the sharp divide between Carney’s leadership and Poilievre’s criticism, setting the stage for a defining Canada 2025 politics showdown.
<<<<<<<<<<<<>>>>>>>>>>>

 

Parliament exploded again yesterday.
This time not over deficits, not over
jobs, but over crime and bail reform.
Pierre Polyav came out swinging,
accusing Mark Carney and the Liberal
government of keeping dangerous
offenders on the streets with what he
calls liberal bail. He framed it as a
national crisis, citing tragic headlines
and demanding that Carney scrap the
system entirely. But what happened next
flipped the script. Carney didn't just
defend his reforms. He delivered a sharp
rebuke, making it crystal clear that
Canada's justice system would not be
dictated by American imports. This is
not based on cut and paste American bail
laws, Carney declared. This is a
Canadian law that works. That one line
may go down as a defining moment. Why?
because it draws a line between two very
different visions.
Carney's Canada first evidence-based
reforms versus Polyav's copy and paste
approach that borrows from the United
States. Mr. Speaker, crime victims don't
want the prime minister's sympathy. They
want to know why he's broken his
promise. They want to know why liberal
bail remains in place, allowing for the
same repeat offenders to to offend again
and again. The body of a woman was found
in the last few days in St. Jerome,
Quebec, killed by her partner who had
been arrested 30 times before but
released on liberal bail.
Unbelievable.
Will the prime minister finally scrap
Liberal bail? Or better yet, get out of
the way so that we can do the jobs
ourselves?
The right honorable prime minister.
Mr. Speaker, this government is bringing
forward comprehensive bail reform. This
comprehensive bail reform is based on
extensive consultations with the
provinces and territories. It's based on
expenses extensive discussions with law
enforcement. It is based on evidence. It
is not based on cut and paste American
bail laws. It's a bail law that works.
We are tough on crime and firm on the
rights of Canadians.
To understand why this exchange matters,
we have to step back. For months, PolyAV
has hammered on bail, arguing that
repeat offenders are walking free, crime
is rising, and Canadians are less safe.
It's a powerful argument emotionally
because it points to real tragedies.
But when you look closer, his solutions
aren't truly Canadian. They're modeled
after America's tough on crime laws. And
here's the irony. America's bail system
is one of the most criticized in the
world. It's punitive. It clogs jails
with low-risk offenders who simply can't
afford bail. And it disproportionately
punishes the poor and marginalized
without making communities safer. These
are the very problems Canada has tried
to avoid for decades.
Carney knew exactly what he was doing
when he rejected that model. By calling
out cut and paste American bail laws, he
was exposing the conservative plan as
imported politics, slogans, not
solutions. He was saying Canadians don't
need US- style fixes. They need reforms
that work here in our communities for
our justice system. And the government's
approach reflects that. Carney laid it
out. Comprehensive bail reform built on
consultations with provinces,
territories, and law enforcement. Not
quick headlines, but months of
negotiation and research. a system tough
on repeat offenders, but also fair and
evidence-driven.
To fully grasp why Carney's not cut and
paste American law line is so
significant, we need to look at Canada's
justice tradition. Unlike the United
States, Canada has long tried to balance
punishment with rehabilitation,
enforcement with rights, and safety with
fairness. Our Charter of Rights and
Freedoms enshrines protections that make
sure the justice system doesn't just
punish, it also safeguards civil
liberties. That doesn't mean Canada
hasn't struggled.
Previous governments, both liberal and
conservative, have wrestled with bail
reform. For decades, courts and
communities have debated how to keep
violent offenders off the streets while
avoiding a system that criminalizes
poverty or overloads prisons with
low-risk individuals.
But what makes Carney's approach
different is the insistence that reforms
must be Canadianmade,
tailored to our legal framework, our
social fabric, and our values.
PolyAV, by contrast, leans into the
American playbook. Harsher bail
conditions, less judicial discretion,
more pre-trial detention. It sounds
tough, but the results in the US speak
for themselves. Mass incarceration,
systemic inequities, and soaring costs
that don't actually deliver safer
communities.
Carney is reminding Canadians that
safety doesn't come from mimicry. It
comes from solutions designed for us,
not imported from elsewhere. And that's
the heart of the clash. On one side, you
have a vision of justice shaped by
evidence, consultation, and Canadian
values. On the other, you have slogans
drawn from a US model that has already
proven deeply flawed. This clash also
reveals something deeper about Canada's
political divide. Polyav thrives on
outrage. His strategy is to amplify fear
and frustration, painting every policy
as broken, every institution as failing,
and every liberal move as reckless. It's
effective politics because anger grabs
attention, but it's not the same as
governing. Carney, on the other hand, is
positioning himself as the grown-up in
the room. His background as an
economist, a former central banker, and
now prime minister gives him credibility
as a problem-solver.
When he says reforms are based on
evidence, he's leaning into that
identity. Not a populist, not a showman,
but a builder of systems.
And here's why the American law angle
matters so much. For years,
conservatives have looked south for
inspiration. whether it's on crime,
taxes, or trade. But Carney is
challenging that reflex, saying Canada
doesn't need to be a mirror image of the
United States. At a time when US
politics is more polarized than ever,
that contrast is politically powerful.
So what we witnessed wasn't just another
parliamentary skirmish. It was a bigger
fight over identity and direction. Do
Canadians want justice policies written
for us by us, evidence-based,
collaborative, Canadianmade,
or do we want Americanstyle politics
dressed up as solutions? Carney's line,
not cut and paste American bail laws,
resonates because it speaks to something
beyond crime. It speaks to sovereignty.
It says Canada can shape its own path
without blindly copying others. And
that's why Polyav looked rattled. His
critique was sharp. But when pressed for
a real alternative, the Conservative
plan looked like what Carney called it,
a US import, not a Canadian solution. At
the heart of this clash is a choice.
Pierre Polyav offers endless criticism,
dramatic language, and solutions
borrowed from America. Mark Carney
offers Canadian reforms crafted with
provinces guided by law enforcement and
rooted in evidence. This is the battle
Canadians are watching unfold in
Parliament. Slogans versus solutions,
imports versus independence, anger
versus action. And here at Canada Today,
we'll keep bringing you the sharpest
analysis of these debates because these
moments aren't just political theater.
They're shaping the future of the
country. Don't miss what happens next.
Subscribe to Canada Today for more
breaking analysis, deep dives, and the
stories behind the sound bites.

[ 打印 ]
評論
目前還沒有任何評論
登錄後才可評論.