個人資料
正文

安省省長福特再次推動“城堡法”並擴大自衛權

(2025-09-04 17:19:51) 下一個

安大略省省長道格·福特再次推動“城堡法”並擴大自衛權

CSSA 2025年8月21日 2條評論

https://cssa-cila.org/ontario-premier-doug-ford-renews-push-for-castle-law-and-expanded-self-protection-rights/

安大略省省長道格·福特再次成為頭條新聞,他再次推動所謂的“城堡法”,該法將承認安大略省居民保衛自己和家園的權利。此舉引發了關於加拿大人在麵對入侵者時應該采取何種程度的激烈爭論。
周三在女王公園,福特指出引人注目的入室盜竊和暴力事件激增,並表示許多人現在“在自己的家中感到恐懼”。他認為,加拿大現行的法律不足以保護那些反擊入室盜竊的人。

“你應該有權保護你的家人和家,而不必擔心最終會被戴上手銬,”福特告訴記者。“如??果有人闖入你的家,你不應該猶豫是否要保護自己或你所愛的人。”

“城堡法”究竟是什麽?

這個概念源於一句老話:“家就是城堡。”在美國,“城堡法”或“城堡原則”賦予房主廣泛的法律保護,如果他們使用武力——甚至是致命武力——來保護自己的財產免受入侵者侵害。大多數擁有此類法律的州都給予免於起訴的權利。

近年來,加拿大在這方麵劃定了更為嚴格的界限。

加拿大的自衛機製

《刑法》第34條允許加拿大人使用“合理”的武力來保護自己、他人或他們的財產。但有一個問題:武力必須與威脅程度相匹配。隻有當致命武力確實是防止死亡或重傷的唯一方法時,它才是正當的。如果有人傷害或殺死了入室盜竊者,警方將調查房主的行為是否“合理且適度”。法律並沒有自動保護——而且,有人後來因法院認定其行為過激而被起訴。

這一標準引發了幾起頗具爭議的案件,一些加拿大人在法官裁定他們使用過度武力保衛家園後被定罪。

《幸運駝鹿法案》:加拿大的變奏

這場辯論中一個值得注意的時刻發生在2009年的“幸運駝鹿”案之後,當時多倫多店主David Chen對一名慣犯實施了公民逮捕。Chen被控襲擊和強製監禁。公眾的強烈反對促成了C-26法案(即“幸運駝鹿法案”)的出台,該法案修改了法律,賦予企業主和房主在實施公民逮捕和保衛財產方麵更清晰的規則和更大的自由度。盡管如此,它還沒有像美國式的城堡法那樣走得那麽遠。使用的武力仍然需要合理,致命武力仍然受到嚴格限製。

政治熱點

福特的最新舉措正值其他省份麵臨同樣的爭論之際,尤其是在一些引人注目的案件之後,例如2016年薩斯喀徹溫省科爾頓·布希槍擊案,以及2018年新斯科舍省一名槍殺入侵者的男子被無罪釋放。

掌握《刑法》的聯邦政府迄今為止一直拒絕接受向美國式城堡法靠攏的呼聲。

福特表示他不會退縮。“我們需要把守法的房主放在罪犯之上,”他說。“安大略省的家庭應該感到安全。”

隨著公共安全成為人們關注的焦點,福特的言論很可能會將這個問題置於公眾的關注中心。

Ontario Premier Doug Ford Renews Push for 'Castle Law' and Expanded Self-Protection Rights

 August 21, 2025 2Comments

https://cssa-cila.org/ontario-premier-doug-ford-renews-push-for-castle-law-and-expanded-self-protection-rights/

Ontario Premier Doug Ford is making headlines again, reviving his push for a so-called “castle law” that would recognize the rights of Ontarians to defend themselves and their homes. It’s a move sparking heated debate about just how far Canadians should be able to go when faced with an intruder.

At Queen’s Park on Wednesday, Ford pointed to a spike in high-profile break-ins and violent incidents, saying many people are now “afraid in their own homes.” He argues Canada’s current laws don’t go far enough to protect those who fight back against home invasions.

“You should have the right to protect your family and your home without worrying you’ll end up in handcuffs,” Ford told reporters. “If someone breaks into your house, you shouldn’t have to second-guess defending yourself or your loved ones.”

What Exactly Is a ‘Castle Law’?

The idea comes from the old saying: “A man’s home is his castle.” In the U.S., “castle laws” or “castle doctrine” give homeowners broad legal protection if they use force — even deadly force — to defend their property against intruders. Most states with these laws grant immunity from prosecution.

Canada has drawn a tighter line in recent times.

How Self-Defence Works in Canada

Section 34 of the Criminal Code lets Canadians use “reasonable” force to defend themselves, others, or their property. But here’s the catch: the force has to match the threat. Lethal force is only justified if it’s truly the only way to prevent death or grave injury. If someone injures or kills a home intruder, police will investigate to see if the homeowner’s actions were “reasonable and proportionate.” There’s no automatic legal shield — and people have been charged when courts later decided they went too far.

This standard has led to several controversial cases, with some Canadians convicted after judges ruled they used excessive force to defend their homes.

The Lucky Moose Bill: A Canadian Twist

One notable moment in this debate came after the 2009 “Lucky Moose” case, when Toronto shopkeeper David Chen made a citizen’s arrest on a repeat shoplifter. Chen was charged with assault and forcible confinement. The public backlash led to Bill C-26, known as the “Lucky Moose Bill,” which changed the law to give business owners and homeowners more clarity and leeway on making citizen’s arrests and defending property. Still, it didn’t go as far as the U.S.-style castle doctrine. The force used still needs to be reasonable, and deadly force remains tightly restricted.

A Political Flashpoint

Ford’s latest push arrives as other provinces wrestle with the same debate, especially after headline-grabbing cases like the 2016 shooting of Colten Boushie in Saskatchewan and the 2018 acquittal of a Nova Scotia man who shot an intruder.

The federal government — which controls the Criminal Code — has so far resisted calls to move toward American-style castle laws.

Ford says he’s not backing down. “We need to put law-abiding homeowners ahead of criminals,” he said. “Ontario families deserve to feel safe.”

With public safety on people’s minds, Ford’s message is likely to keep the issue front and center.

[ 打印 ]
評論
目前還沒有任何評論
登錄後才可評論.