誰選擇了希特勒
(2014-11-24 16:45:20)
下一個
(March, 2012)
時至今日,這仍然是個讓全世界人民集體性自覺回避真相,卻努力尋找著各種替代答案的問題。
1932年的那一次民主選舉最終把納粹和希特勒推上了德國政治舞台。"女性的選票使希特勒獲勝",<Voice of Destruction>的作者Hermann Rauschning 如是說。希特勒自己也在一次講演中驕傲地說:我們爭取到的女性,比所有其他黨派加起來都要多!
詭異的事情是,一戰後的威瑪共和期間,德國女權獲得長足進步。自1918年女性開始享受選舉權。但是僅僅經過區區十數年的民主運作,德國人民就把接力棒順順利利地交到獨裁手中。更為詭異的事情是,女人們用她們得來不易的權利,把權力拱手送給了一個聲張男權的黨派。
這到底是怎麽回事?
王小波先生有一篇雜文討論蠱惑宣傳的問題。以我看這是小波先生最糟糕的一篇文章,根本不知所雲。核心問題在於他天真地以為人文社會學當中有著"正派學問"與"異端邪說"之分。這就把他自己完全繞在裏麵了。實際的事情是,'精神掌握群眾'的唯一渠道隻能是demagogy,別無他途的。至於你的理論是欺世的異端邪說,還是濟世的人間真理,那完全決定於你的個人立場。
希特勒先生在那次講演中(國家社會黨婦女大會上的講話)有一段話,本身既是蠱惑(女性)大眾的傑作,又同時點明了蠱惑宣傳的精髓。小波先生與之相比豈止是幼稚了。且把這段講話記錄在這裏。
(Hitler)I remember the difficult years of the Movement’s fight and especially those times in which good fortune seemed to have turned away from us; ••• ••• I know that back then there were innumerable women who remained unshakably loyal to the Movement and to me.
At that time, the power of emotion truly proved itself to be stronger and better. We have seen that the clever mind can be misled only all too easily, that ostensibly intellectual arguments can cause men of weak intellect to falter, and that it is particularly in these times that the most profound inner instinct of preservation of the self and of the Volk awakens in a woman. Woman has proven to us that she knows what is right! In those times when the great Movement seemed, to many, to falter and all were united against us, the stability and sureness of emotion prevailed as stable factors when confronted with brooding intellect and supposed knowledge. For only very few are endowed with the talent of penetrating superficial knowledge to the most profound inner meaning. But this most profound insight is ultimately the root of the world of emotion. That which perhaps only few philosophically gifted intellects are capable of analyzing scientifically can be sensed by the nature of an unspoiled human being with instinctive certainty. The feeling and, above all, the nature of woman has always acted throughout the ages as a supplement to the intellect of man.
多謝美言!不敢當的。推薦的網站我會去找來瀏覽瀏覽。
為什麽寫東西?主要一點是不想放棄中文,畢竟是自己的第一語言吧。工作上用中文的機會為零,且研究的題目寫起來是一種攪腦汁兒的活計。業餘寫些隨感的玩意是種調劑,好像鍛煉中的cross training。不動筆的時候,很多想法時過境遷就丟過手了。記下來的同時也是自己和自己討論的機會。對生性喜歡思考的人這是一個樂趣。寫下來了不妨就放在這裏,倒也不在乎看到人多少了。
中文媒體和網站總不可避免要滑向世俗小報的境地去。這個我們無能為力,能夠的也隻是發些異聲罷了。
哦,原來你說的'聖賢之言'是中國的。那我就不好意思評論了。
中國文化在遙遠的過去完成了它的使命並抵達它的邏輯終點,然後在近代轟然倒下。如今它靠著西方之技苟延著,但不可避免地在潰爛下去。
風聲雨聲讀書聲,聲聲入耳;家事國事天下事,事事關心——聖賢之言;
百善孝當先,萬惡淫為首——世俗之論;
百善孝當先,論心不論跡,論跡貧家無孝子;萬惡淫為首,論跡不論心,論心終古無完人——聖賢之言;
中國俗語、諺語中包含的世俗之論更多,如”關公麵前耍大刀“、”癩蛤蟆想吃天鵝肉“等等。
'聖賢之言'的邏輯極限就是'世俗之論'。人類總難逃此劫的,因為人類邏輯能力的限度。