隴山隴西郡

寧靜純我心 感得事物人 寫樸實清新. 閑書閑話養閑心,閑筆閑寫記閑人;人生無虞懂珍惜,以沫相濡字字真。
個人資料
  • 博客訪問:
文章分類
歸檔
正文

錢永健-諾貝爾獎獲得者 Roger Y. Tsien - R.I.P.

(2016-09-02 10:24:47) 下一個

R.I.P.

Nobel Laureate Roger Tsien Dies at 64 - NBC News Tsien died on Aug. 24 in Eugene, Oregon, according to a statement Wednesday from the university. UC San Diego Chancellor Pradeep Khosla said that Tsien apparently died while on a bike trail, the San Diego Union-Tribune reported, but the cause of death had not been determined.

Image result for roger tsien wife

Image result for roger tsien wife

~~~~~~~~~~~~~

The Nobel Prize in Chemistry 2008
Osamu Shimomura, Martin Chalfie, Roger Y. Tsien

Share this:
34
 
 
 

Roger Y. Tsien - Biographical

Q: What do elementary school pupils and Nobel Laureates have in common?
A: They both have to write autobiographical essays on command.

Ancestors and family
My father, Hsue Chu Tsien (1915–1997), came from the "scholar-gentry" class in Hangzhou, China, where "Tsien" (now more commonly transliterated as Qian) is quite a common surname. Apparently in 907 A.D., Qian Liu, my paternal ancestor 34 generations ago, established a kingdom around Hangzhou and fostered its growth through many civil engineering projects. This fiefdom prospered peacefully under the rule of Qian Liu and his successors until 978, when they surrendered to the Sung dynasty to avoid bloodshed*. I had thought that descent from Qian Liu was an obscure secret of our family, but this factlet somehow found its way onto Wikipedia through no fault of mine. Furthermore, this genealogy is hardly much of a distinction given that everyone in principle has 234 ancestors from 34 generations ago. 234 (about 17 billion) vastly exceeds the earth's population in the 10th century, so practically everyone, at least from that part of China, probably has Qian Liu as an ancestor, even if not so strictly through the Y chromosome. By far the most famous Tsien in modern times is Hsue Shen Tsien or Qian Xuesen, the aeronautical engineer who was deported from the U.S. during the McCarthy era and then became father of the ballistic missile program of the People's Republic1. He and my father were first cousins. Several other Chinese-American bioscientists, including Robert Tjian, now President of the Howard Hughes Medical Institute, and Shu Chien, a prominent bioengineer at UCSD, also have the same Chinese surname as mine and are likewise descended from Qian Liu, so we are distant relatives.

Dad too was excited by flight and airplanes, which were the cutting-edge technology of his day. In the 1930s he won a national scholarship (Tsinghua) to study in America. He went to MIT's mechanical engineering department, where he obtained a Master's degree for research on aircraft engines, including a proposal to boost the thrust during takeoff by injecting water into the exhaust to become steam. Before he could pursue any further studies in America, he had to return to China to serve in the Nationalist (Kuomingtang) Air Force. One of his best friends and fellow engineers, Yao Tzu Li, had an attractive and intelligent sister, Yi Ying Li, who had trained as a nurse at Peking Union Medical College, the most prestigious of Chinese medical institutions. My father courted her eagerly by letters even before they had ever met in person. When they finally did meet, she found him socially awkward and overly impressed with his own academic prowess2. Despite her lack of romantic feelings for him, she agreed to marry him, perhaps because she doubted her own prospects in wartime China. Their first son, Yongyou, was born in March 1945. Soon thereafter, Dad was ordered to go to the U.S. as a liaison officer to try to extract more military aid for the Chinese Air Force. He had to travel over the Himalayas to India and then by ship, zigzagging to avoid enemy submarines, so he did not arrive in the U.S. until the day that Japan's surrender was announced2. His mission was therefore futile, but he knew that China would be racked by postwar civil war. Somehow he used contacts in the Defense Department to arrange for Mom and Yongyou to come to the U.S. Such permission was not trivial, because the Chinese Exclusion Act forbidding immigration from China to the U.S. had been repealed only in 1943, at which time the national quota was set at just 105 immigrants per year and thousands were ahead on the waiting list.

After Mom and Yongyou arrived in America in January 1947, life was quite a struggle because Dad could not find a professional job as an aircraft engineer. Such employment at the major firms required a security clearance, which a Chinese citizen could not get. So he started a tiny export-import business in New York City and later an engineering consultancy firm in Westchester County, which yielded enough to live on but not to become prosperous. Nevertheless their next son, Yonglo or Louis, was born in October 1949. Around then, Yongyou started school and needed to pick an American name. He wanted to be "Dick", so the school officials explained to my parents that this was a nickname for "Richard". "Yongyou" was somehow transliterated as "Winyu" to become Richard's middle name in English.

According to Mom, she always planned to have three children, though this statement came many years after the fact. After two sons, even Dad was looking forward to a girl2, but in February 1952 they got me instead. Dad picked my Chinese name, Yongjian (transliterated Yonchien to become my middle name in English), but Dick insisted that my American name should be Roger. My mother later told me this was because Dick had a playmate at the time named Roger. Much later, perhaps when I was in college, I quizzed Dick about this mysterious namesake. Dick confessed that he actually named me after Roy Rogers, the famous cowboy actor. I mention all this to clarify the origins of the similarity between the names "Richard W. Tsien" and "Roger Y. Tsien", which has continually confused many scientists and their secretaries even up to now. I don't know why my parents chose two different transliterations for "Yong", but if they had not, Richard and I would be completely indistinguishable ("Tsien RY") in bibliographical databases.

Growing up: Home chemistry experiments
One of my earliest memories, probably from age 3 or 4, is of building a sand path at the beach across a strip of coarse pebbles that hurt my feet to cross. I loved to draw maps of imaginary cities with freeways vaulting over or tunneling under the surface streets. Perhaps these were the first signs of my future obsessions with bridge-building and activity-mapping. Some time in elementary school my parents bought a Gilbert chemistry set, but I didn't find it very interesting because the experiments seemed so tame. Then I discovered a book in the school library that had much better experiments and illustrations. Regrettably, I cannot now remember the book's name or author, though I hand-copied many sketches of its experiments into a notebook dated around 1960, now deposited in the Nobel Museum. Two experiments I remember best: 1) silica gardens, in which crystals of metal salts (e.g. CoCl2, NiSO4, CuSO4) dropped into a solution of sodium silicate would develop bright magenta, green, or blue gelatinous coatings from which vertically rising dendrites would sprout; 2) preparation of a strongly alkaline (0.5M NaOH or KOH) aqueous solution of dilute (~ 0.5 mM) potassium permanganate, which colored the liquid an intense purple. As this solution passed through a folded cone of filter paper, its color changed to a beautiful green, reflecting reduction of MnO4- to MnO42–, presumably by the cellulose. In November 2008, I reproduced this surprisingly little-known demonstration for Swedish television and Nobel Media as an example of what got me interested in chemistry. Both experiments reflect an early and long-lasting obsession with pretty colors.

Our family in 1960, just before moving to Livingston.
Figure 1. Our family in 1960, just before moving to Livingston. From left: Richard (15), Louis (11), H.C. (my father), me (8), Yi Ying (my mother).

In 1959, Dad closed his consulting firm and started working for RCA's vacuum tube division in Harrison, NJ. Mom and Dad looked for a town with affordable homes, within convenient commuting distance, and with good public schools for the three of us. A photo from around then is Figure 1. They chose a new housing development in Livingston, NJ, but the developer refused to sell to us, saying that they could not permit Livingston to become a Chinatown, nor could they afford the likelihood that other customers would refuse to buy houses next to a Chinese family. My parents appealed to the Governor of New Jersey, Robert Meyner. His office sent a letter to the developers warning them that racial discrimination was illegal. Finally a compromise was reached: the developers sold us a house completely surrounded by houses that had already been sold. The problem for us kids was that Livingston has lots of rocks in its soil, left from the glaciers. My parents were determined to have a respectable American-style grassy lawn, which required removal of the rocks. We had to cart away not only our own stones but many from our neighbors, who had used the unoccupied leftover lot as a dumping ground, or so we believed. The many weeds in the lawn revealed a deep personality difference: Dad, as an impatient mechanical engineer, liked the instant solution of digging them up one by one from close enough to extirpate all the roots. I was an occasionally asthmatic hay fever sufferer, deeply afraid of pollen, so I advocated a chemical approach, sprinkling herbicide on the weeds from a safe distance. We tried my way once. The weeds slowly turned brown but eventually recovered. Dad declared the experiment a failure and went back to hand weeding. I still think about this result in relation to our current research on cancer therapy.

In 1960, RCA closed its vacuum tube division, presumably because semiconductors were replacing tubes, so Dad moved to Esso (later renamed Exxon) Research and Engineering. Esso provided much better projects and pay, so he stayed until his retirement in 1983. I believe some of the chemicals and glassware that enabled me to do the more interesting chemistry experiments were diverted from the company stockroom. Other supplies could be bought by mail order in those days with a parent's signature. Over the next 5 or 6 years I gradually did many of the classic experiments of inorganic chemistry in the basement of our house: preparing and burning H2 gas, preparing O2 and burning steel wool in it, preparing NH3 in a flask and watching it suck water up as a fountain inside the flask. I distilled HF from CaF2 + H2SO4 in plastic apparatus and was delighted to see its ability to etch glass. I electrolyzed molten NaOH using a step-down transformer and rectifier from a model train set, the nickel crucible as cathode, and a carbon rod salvaged from a dead flashlight battery as anode. I managed to get a few granules of very impure metallic sodium, which gave off a satisfying hiss when dropped into water. Pyrotechnics were naturally of great interest: I made and ignited gunpowder, ammonium dichromate volcanoes, and even a spectacular thermite reaction with powdered aluminum and chromium oxide. My most ambitious attempt was a multistep sequence aimed at synthesizing aspirin, for which I needed acetic anhydride, which had to be made from acetyl chloride, for which I needed phosphorus trichloride, for which I needed to burn red phosphorus in a stream of chlorine gas. I tried to do this reaction sequence in flasks with rubber stoppers (Figure 2), because I had no glassware with ground glass joints. The corrosive chemicals largely chewed up the rubber, so I did not get beyond acetyl chloride. Because I had no fume hood, I did the more dangerous experiments outdoors on a picnic table on the backyard patio. Looking back, I am appalled at how dangerous all this was for an unsupervised boy of 8 to 15, but it was also very good training in how to improvise equipment, plan and execute experiments, interpret confusing results, and decide how to do things better. These experiments made me confident enough that when I had to earn my first merit badge as a Boy Scout and was advised to pick something really easy, I chose Chemistry. Tougher merit badges like Hiking, with its requirement for a twenty-mile hike in one day, I got later.

Setup for preparing Cl2 and reacting it with red phosphorus

Elementary school to high school;
Westinghouse science talent search

School was usually bearable but frequently boring. I really looked forward to days in winter when heavy snow would close school, so that I could spend the day sledding. I was terrible at ball games at school, such as football, soccer, basketball, and softball, because I was small, nonathletic, and two years younger than my classmates at an age when this makes a huge difference. But I was popular enough in high school to be elected student council treasurer by an overwhelming majority.

Mom tried hard to teach us Chinese after school, but as I got older I found these lessons increasingly tedious. I well understood spoken Chinese at a child's level (e.g. the Chinese for "Tidy your room!" is permanently etched into my brain) but was reluctant to speak it myself, due to the wish (all too common among children of immigrants) to distance myself from my parents' accents and intense pride in their ethnicity and traditions. Likewise they despaired over my refusal (like a "foreign devil") to eat most Chinese food, especially the most authentic dishes with the strongest tastes or smells, or prepared from exotic creatures.

My first exposure to a research environment was in a National Science Foundation-sponsored summer research program at Ohio University in 1967, where I was assigned to work in the laboratory of Prof. Robert Kline on the ambident coordination of thiocyanate (SCN). The Pearson theory of hard and soft ligands and metals was new and fashionable at the time, so Prof. Kline wanted me to find out if thiocyanate could simultaneously bind with its "soft" sulfur to a soft metal and its "hard" nitrogen to a hard metal, e.g. PhHg–SCN–Cr(III). He hoped that the infrared absorbances of thiocyanate would tell us whether such bridging was taking place. I prepared a lot of amorphous precipitates of rather ill-defined composition and measured their infrared spectra. In the winter of 1967, my senior year at Livingston High School, I entered the Westinghouse Science Talent Search, the nationwide "science fair" competition. (This annual event still exists, though sponsorship was taken over by Intel in 1998.) For lack of any alternatives, I wrote up my Ohio University project, trying my best to draw some conclusions from a mess of dubious data. Prof. Kline largely disowned those conclusions, pointing out that my preparations had not given correct carbon, hydrogen, and nitrogen microanalyses. The 40 finalists were summoned to Washington DC in March 1968 for interviews and a public poster session. I remember being envious of my fellow finalists, who were much more adult and sophisticated. Also their projects and exhibits seemed much more exciting and explainable than mine. I felt intimidated by the senior judge, Glenn Seaborg, partly because of his commanding height, partly because he was chairman of the U.S. Atomic Energy Commission, partly because of his 1951 Nobel Prize for work in inorganic chemistry. The awards ceremony was very tense for us because the ten scholarship winners were announced in reverse order, forcing everyone to hope their name was called but as late as possible. I am still mystified how I won first prize despite the unsoundness of my project, and I retain a dislike for scientific competitions. Dad did his bit to keep me grounded: when I phoned home, his first comment was that it was a good thing I now had a $10,000 scholarship, because he had recently lost that amount on the stock market. One of the most satisfying compliments I received was that the developer who had not wanted to sell a house to Mom and Dad in 1960 now used my photo in one of their advertisements as evidence of the quality of the local school system.

Harvard
In April 1968 I had to choose between four colleges: Columbia, MIT, Caltech, and Harvard. Dad vetoed Columbia because of the student unrest that spring, and I did not mind because I wanted to get further away from New Jersey. I rejected MIT because Dick and Louis had both gone there and I was tired of being compared to them. The small size of Caltech's undergraduate class sounded attractive, but I finally decided against Caltech because Richard Feynman was no longer teaching introductory physics and because the music department was tiny and of negligible fame compared to Harvard's. Indeed Harvard did turn out to be a salutary experience on the whole. Friendships with classmates were crucial in helping me grow up. The student protests of spring 1969 and 1970 provided my first exposures to cannabis, police brutality, and participatory politics. The diversity of courses let me sample art history, visual design, economics, Colonial history, constitutional law, psychology, both music theory and chamber music performance, etc. Ironically, the worst courses were those intended to lead Harvard's elite chemistry majors into research careers. These required courses were so distasteful I abandoned chemistry. Looking for alternatives, I dabbled in molecular biology (taught by Walter Gilbert, who later shared a Nobel Prize for DNA sequencing), oceanography, relativistic quantum mechanics, and astrophysics. But what I finally chose was neurobiology, partly because the relationship between brain and mind seemed philosophically the most important problem in science, partly because David Hubel, John Nicholls, and Torsten Wiesel ran a course charismatically proselytizing undergraduates to become neuroscientists. Hubel and Wiesel were still doing the research on visual cortex that eventually won them the 1981 Nobel Prize in Medicine or Physiology. I asked Prof. Hubel if I could do a summer internship in their lab, but he told me they had no space for undergraduates and suggested that I apply to Nelson Kiang at the Massachusetts Eye and Ear Infirmary instead. In summer 1971, Kiang gave me intensive tutorials in auditory neurophysiology and an interesting project analyzing spike trains from the cochlear nucleus. I am still plugging away at neurobiological problems almost four decades later.

Cambridge
When I asked Hubel and Kiang for advice on where to apply to graduate school in neuroscience, their only point of agreement was that the top places were Cambridge, MA and Cambridge, UK. I felt it was time to leave Cambridge, MA to broaden my horizons, so I applied for a Marshall Scholarship to go to the other Cambridge. In early 1972, while still a senior at Harvard, I learned my application was successful, and that my Ph.D. supervisor would be a Dr. R. H. Adrian, whom I had never heard of. I phoned my brother Dick, who had just become an Assistant Professor at Yale after finishing his D. Phil. from Oxford on cardiac electrophysiology. Dick informed me that R. H. Adrian was one of Britain's most eminent skeletal muscle electrophysiologists, and son of E. D. Adrian, a Nobel Laureate in neurophysiology. Moreover R. H. Adrian had been the external examiner on Dick's D. Phil. degree. "But muscle is a backwater," I exclaimed. "I want to work on the brain." Dick assured me that Richard Adrian was a true British gentleman, who would let me work on a topic of my own choosing. So I decided to wait and see. After a summer intensively studying music at Fontainebleau, near Paris, I arrived in Cambridge in October 1972. At my first lunch in Churchill College, an aristocratic-looking don sat down opposite me and asked if I was Roger Tsien. I immediately realized he was Richard Adrian, because only someone who knew a member of my family could pronounce our surname correctly, as he just had. Within the first few minutes of our conversation, he asked "Is it true you think muscle is a backwater?" I had to admit the accuracy of the quotation. (I later found out that Dick had mischievously teased Adrian about this at a conference they had both attended that summer.) Adrian looked a bit pained at my confession, but immediately said that he would not object whenever I wanted to transfer to one of the real neurophysiologists in the department.

Thus began my Ph.D. training. I never did switch to another official supervisor, because I soon realized I did not enjoy doing conventional electrophysiology of the central nervous system. The traditional thesis project, basically following the paradigm so successfully employed by Hubel and Wiesel, was to drop an extracellular microelectrode into the brain of an anesthetized animal and record the activity of individual neurons while providing sensory stimuli. After several hundred such recordings, one could classify the different response patterns and write up a thesis and several publications. To me this seemed too much like ice fishing, i.e. cutting a hole in the ice covering a lake, dropping a fishing line into the opaque water beneath, and patiently waiting for a bite. The brain derives its power from trillions of neurons working in parallel, so I wanted to see lots of neurons simultaneously signaling to each other and processing information. Ideally one would stain the neurons with a dye that would visibly light up or change color whenever and wherever a neuron fired an action potential. A few commercially available dyes had indeed been found that responded to neuronal action potentials, but the optical responses were extremely tiny, e.g. a 10–4 or 10–5 change in fluorescence.

They were detectable only if thousands of action potentials driven by the investigator were averaged under highly simplified conditions3. Many orders of magnitude improvement would be necessary to detect endogenous signals in a complex brain. I rashly decided in winter 1972 that I would try to design and synthesize new dyes for the specific purpose of imaging neuronal activity. One strategy was to target the dye to the vicinity of sodium channels, which were believed to undergo large conformational changes as they generated action potentials. Another strategy was to create "electrochromic dyes" with large changes in dipole moment between ground and excited state, so that a change in neuronal membrane potential could shift the peak wavelengths of absorbance or fluorescence4. In either case I would have to learn organic synthesis, which I had hated in those Harvard chemistry courses and which nobody in the Physiological Laboratory could teach me. Fortunately, Dr. Ian Baxter, a junior faculty member in the Chemistry Department and a friend of a friend of Richard Adrian's, was intrigued by my idea for targeting sodium channels and agreed to supervise me unofficially. Baxter had no other students and had the time, kindness, and patience to look over my shoulder several times a day and show me the necessary techniques. I found to my own surprise that I could do and enjoy organic synthesis once it was for a biological purpose of my own choosing. I remained hooked on this type of research even though the molecule I synthesized proved incapable of binding sodium channels, even though Baxter soon left to become a careers counselor in the north of England, and even after other generations of my synthetic voltage sensors proved inferior to those found by other labs screening large numbers of commercially available dyes and their close analogs5.

My first glimmer of success required shifting to another biological target. Action potentials almost always generate large increases in intracellular calcium to exert any biological effect such as the release of neurotransmitters to excite or inhibit the next neuron in the pathway. In 1975 there was great excitement over the discovery that arsenazo III, a dye invented to measure heavy metals in nuclear waste, could also be used to monitor calcium in giant axons from squid neurons, though the signals from this dye were very small and somewhat ambiguous6. I felt that designing a dye to measure Ca2+ should be a far easier problem than designing a dye to track fast changes in neuronal membrane potential. Hundreds of dyes were already known in the chemical literature to respond to Ca2+, e.g. for determination of water hardness. The real problem was that inside cells, the free Mg2+ concentration is about four orders of magnitude higher than that of Ca2+, so that an intracellular Ca2+ indicator needs yet higher selectivity for Ca2+ over its sister ion Mg2+. No chemist had yet recognized the biological need for such a selective indicator. A colorless buffer called EGTA was the only synthetic molecule known to have the necessary Ca2+:Mg2+ selectivity7, but it had never been made into any sort of dye molecule. By doodling on paper and playing with molecular models, I saw a way to make EGTA into a very rudimentary dye molecule. I started on this brand new project without telling Richard Adrian, because any prudent supervisor would have told me I should be bringing older projects to closure rather than starting radically new ones. Fortunately, within a few weeks I managed to make a small, impure sample of the target molecule (much later given the acronym "BAPTA") and found that it had the expected optical response to Ca2+ combined with high Ca2+:Mg2+ selectivity8. After many more years and discoveries, better dyes descended from BAPTA** became the most popular way of seeing endogenous intracellular Ca2+ signals, screening for ligands and receptors linked to Ca2+ signaling, and imaging neuronal activity microscopically.10

After my Ph.D., I stayed in Cambridge as a postdoctoral Research Fellow at Gonville & Caius College. My change in focus towards Ca2+ signaling led me into collaboration with Dr. Timothy Rink, a new faculty member in the Physiological Laboratory, because Tim wanted to make Ca2+-selective electrodes from materials sent from Switzerland11. The directions for assembly were in German, which Tim could not read. I had learned to read chemistry papers in German, so I translated the instructions. Our collaboration started with these Ca2+-selective electrodes and continued with the biological testing and exploitation of my fluorescent indicators for Ca2+. Even more importantly, Tim and his wife Norma invited me to their Christmas party in 1976, where I first met their sister-in-law, Wendy. Soon I was spending every weekend visiting Wendy at her house in North London. When Tim and Norma found out several months later, they were quite astonished at the effectiveness of their entirely unintentional matchmaking. Wendy (Figures 3–4) is still the love of my life.

Berkeley
My fellowship at Gonville & Caius College was to end in late 1981, so in 1979–1980 I started looking for an independent position. Because of Wendy's residence in London, I applied to the National Institute of Medical Research in Mill Hill, but was rejected without an interview. This was not a good time to search for a research job in Britain, because of the austerity program of the new Thatcher administration. It was time to return to the U.S., yet I had almost no contacts and few publications. Almost all my applications were unsuccessful. Biological departments considered me a chemist, while chemistry departments rejected me as a biologist. Nowadays the application of chemistry to solve biological problems is a very fashionable subdiscipline dubbed "chemical biology", but in 1980 the only venue for such interdisciplinary efforts was in the pharmaceutical industry. Even there, individual scientists were typically either chemists or biologists, not both simultaneously.

Wendy with our dog, Kiri, in 2004

Luck intervened. The Department of Physiology-Anatomy, University of California, Berkeley, had a vacant assistant professorship, for which the chair of the search committee was Terry Machen, whom I had gotten to know while he was on sabbatical in Cambridge. Also Berkeley had two faculty members, Richard Steinhardt and Robert Zucker, who were interested in Ca2+ signaling. These connections enabled me to get an interview at Berkeley. Fortunately, the fluorescent indicators for Ca2+ had finally progressed enough to enable the first direct measurements of cytosolic Ca2+ in lymphocytes, including the elevation due to mitogenic stimulation12,13. Now one could investigate Ca2+ signals in populations of small mammalian cells, whereas previous techniques required single cells large and robust enough to withstand microinjection. This prospect, together with the fact that my Ph.D. was in Physiology, convinced the Department to offer me the Assistant Professorship, which I accepted before I found out that Berkeley was suffering a financial crisis. The startup package to get my laboratory going in early 1982 was cut to just a few thousand dollars, and each item had to be justified as a replacement for obsolete instructional equipment. For example, to get me a UV lamp for viewing thin layer chromatography plates, an old microscope illuminator from the teaching lab had to be junked. More importantly, the Department had no resources to provide a fume hood, which I needed to continue synthesizing the Ca2+ indicators. Prof. Robert Macey, whose lab was next to mine, kindly donated an old fume hood including its irreplaceable ductwork extending to the roof of the building. For the remainder of my seven years at Berkeley, all our synthetic reactions took place in this single wooden fume hood, less than 4 feet wide, with wire netting embedded in the glass of the front window. The entire lab stank from chemicals in unvented storage cabinets, and became lachrymatory when reactions using excess ethyl bromoacetate had to be worked up outside the hood. I mention these austerities only to remind young scientists that some good research can be accomplished without lavish facilities and startup funds.

Despite these troubles, my time at Berkeley was scientifically quite productive, including collaborations with Machen14, Steinhardt15, Zucker16, and others. I recruited Drs. Grzegorz Grynkiewicz and Akwasi Minta, who synthesized much improved Ca2+ indicators (fura-2, indo-1, fluo-3)17,18 and a Na+ indicator (SBFI)19, all of which are still in use today. After the budget crisis eased, the Berkeley administration helped me buy a primitive image processor, which I painfully programmed20 to calculate images of the ratio of fluorescences at two alternating excitation wavelengths. Such real-time ratioing revealed Ca2+, Na+, and pH signals14 inside single living cells, often with unprecedented spatiotemporal resolution.

Moving to UCSD
However, I began to worry about being trapped in a career of imaging inorganic ions. I wanted to explore signals transmitted through more complex biochemicals such as cAMP (cyclic 3',5-adenosine monophosphate) and the wider, more fashionable world of macromolecular interactions. As my bargaining power grew, I also came to want a lab with enough fume hoods, vented storage cabinets, and small darkrooms for fluorescence microscopy to support my unusual combination of chemistry and biology, as well as a joint appointment in a Chemistry department and support from the Howard Hughes Medical Institute. None of these were possible in Berkeley, so in 1989 we moved south to the University of California, San Diego, where we still are. UCSD satisfied the above desires and was much younger, roomier, faster-growing, and less tradition-bound than Berkeley, which I felt more than compensated for its lesser fame. The highlights of the science started at UCSD are recounted in my Nobel lecture.

Dressed up for the Nobel Ceremony

Conclusions
Writing this autobiography has reminded me how my career has been shaped by a strange mixture of chance and fateful predisposition. The use of chemistry to build biologically useful molecules is a form of engineering, so I did not escape the tradition set up by my father, uncles, and brothers. However, I avoided the mechanical, aeronautical, electrical, and computer specialties they chose, probably because like many youngest siblings21, I had to seek a distinct niche. But if I had not found Ian Baxter to re-instill my enjoyment of chemistry, perhaps I would have chosen yet another direction. My interest in imaging with multiple glowing colors also reflects visual interests from early childhood, which I have been lucky enough to align with a professional career. From a strictly biological point of view, our contributions have mainly been in the development of techniques. Man-made techniques do have a habit of becoming obsolete, whereas basic discoveries about how nature works should last forever. But truly fundamental insights such as those of Darwin or Watson & Crick are rare and often subject to intense competition, whereas development of successful techniques to address important problems allows lesser mortals to exert a widespread beneficial impact for at least a few years. Moreover, the same engineering approach is what creates new therapeutic strategies to alleviate disease, not just tools for our fellow researchers.


 



 

* The benevolent reign of these kings is commemorated in at least two immaculately maintained shrines, one in Lin'an, a medium-sized city in Zhejiang Province, the other constructed in 2002 on prime real estate on the famous West Lake at the center of Hangzhou. My mother, my wife, and I visited both shrines in 2004. My mother interpreted the prominence of these shrines as an attempt by the current Chinese regime to advertise a historical precedent for reunification with Taiwan.

** The invention of a generalizable structure that sensed Ca2+ with unprecedented selectivity was duly reported to the National Research Development Corporation, as required for work funded by the UK Science Research Council. Initially NRDC was enthusiastic enough to file a patent application, 42927/78, but the administrators soon decided that measuring intracellular Ca2+ was of negligible commercial value. They felt that the only possible use for biological Ca2+ measurements was in clinical assays in blood serum, an application with completely different performance criteria, so they abandoned the patent application. In principle I could have taken over the patent costs out of my own pocket, but the NRDC's estimate of the fees equaled about 20 years of a postdoctoral salary, so I did not try. Eventually, follow-up patent applications by the University of California covering narrower variations in molecular structure proved quite lucrative. A much more important example of the NRDC's conservatism9 was their failure to patent Milstein and Köhler's monoclonal antibodies, another Cambridge invention of the mid-1970's.

References
1. Chang, I. Thread of the Silkworm. Basic Books (1995).
2. Tsien, Y. Y. Unpublished memoirs. 2007.
3. Conti, F. & Tasaki, I., "Changes in extrinsic fluorescence in squid axons during voltage-clamp," Science 169, 1322–1324 (1970).
4. Platt, J. R. "Electrochromism, A Possible Change of Color Producible in Dyes by An Electric Field," J. Chemical Physics 34, 862–863 (1961).
5. Cohen, L. B. & Salzberg, B. M., "Optical measurement of membrane potential," Rev. Physiol. Biochem. Pharmacol. 83, 35–88 (1978).
6. Brown, J. E. et al., "Rapid changes of intracellular free calcium concentration: detection by metallochromic indicator dyes in squid giant axon," Biophys. J. 15, 1155–1160 (1975).
7. Schwarzenbach, G., Senn, H. & Anderegg, G., "Komplexone XXIX. Ein Grosser Chelateffekt Besonderer Art," Helv. Chim. Acta 40, 1886–1900 (1957).
8. Tsien, R. Y., "New calcium indicators and buffers with high selectivity against magnesium and protons: design, synthesis, and properties of prototype structures," Biochemistry 19, 2396–2404 (1980).
9. Milstein, C., "With the benefit of hindsight," Immunol. Today 21, 359–364 (2000).
10. Tsien, R. Y., "Monitoring Cell Calcium," chapter 2 in Calcium as a Cellular Regulator, Carafoli, E. & Klee, C. (eds.), pp. 28–54 (Oxford University Press, New York, 1999).
11. Ammann, D., Güggi, M., Pretsch, E. & Simon, W., "Improved calcium ion-selective electrode based on a neutral carrier," Analytical Letters 8, 709–720 (1975).
12. Tsien, R. Y., Pozzan, T. & Rink, T. J., "T-cell mitogens cause early changes in cytoplasmic free Ca2+ and membrane potential in lymphocytes," Nature 295, 68–71 (1982).
13. Tsien, R. Y., Pozzan, T. & Rink, T. J., "Calcium homeostasis in intact lymphocytes: cytoplasmic free Ca2+ monitored with a new, intracellularly trapped fluorescent indicator," J. Cell Biol. 94, 325–334 (1982).
14. Paradiso, A. M., Tsien, R. Y. & Machen, T. E., "Digital image processing of intracellular pH in gastric oxyntic and chief cells," Nature 325, 447–450 (1987).
15. Poenie, M., Alderton, J., Tsien, R. Y. & Steinhardt, R. A., "Changes in free calcium levels with stages of the cell division cycle," Nature 315, 147–149 (1985).
16.  Tsien, R. Y. & Zucker, R. S., "Control of cytoplasmic calcium with photolabile tetracarboxylate 2-nitrobenzhydrol chelators," Biophys. J. 50, 843–853 (1986).
17. Grynkiewicz, G., Poenie, M. & Tsien, R. Y., "A new generation of Ca2+ indicators with greatly improved fluorescence properties," J. Biol. Chem. 260, 3440–3450 (1985).
18. Minta, A., Kao, J. P. Y. & Tsien, R. Y., "Fluorescent indicators for cytosolic calcium based on rhodamine and fluorescein chromophores," J. Biol. Chem. 264, 8171–8178 (1989).
19. Minta, A. & Tsien, R. Y., "Fluorescent indicators for cytosolic sodium," J. Biol. Chem. 264, 19449–19457 (1989).
20. Tsien, R. Y. & Harootunian, A. T., "Practical design criteria for a dynamic ratio imaging system," Cell Calcium 11, 93–109 (1990).
21. Sulloway, F. J., Born to Rebel: Birth order, family dynamics, and creative lives, Pantheon Books, New York (1996).

From Les Prix Nobel. The Nobel Prizes 2008, Editor Karl Grandin, [Nobel Foundation], Stockholm, 2009

This autobiography/biography was written at the time of the award and later published in the book series Les Prix Nobel/ Nobel Lectures/The Nobel Prizes. The information is sometimes updated with an addendum submitted by the Laureate.

Copyright © The Nobel Foundation 2008

 

Roger Tsien died on 24 August 2016.

 

~~~~~~~~~~~

Roger Yonchien Tsien (1952–2016)

Journal name:
Nature
Volume:
538,
Page:
172
Date published:
DOI:
doi:10.1038/538172a
Published online

Creator of a rainbow of fluorescent probes that lit up biology.

Roger Yonchien Tsien pioneered the use of light and colour to 'peek and poke' at living cells to see how they work. His most famous achievement, recognized by a share of the Nobel Prize in Chemistry in 2008, transformed biology: he developed a rainbow of probes, based on the jellyfish green fluorescent protein (GFP), to illuminate cell structure and function.

Holger Motzkau/Wikipedia/Wikimedia Commons

Roger died suddenly in a park near his home in Oregon on 24 August. He was born in New York in 1952 with science in his blood. His father's cousin was Tsien Hsue-shen (Qian Xuesen), architect of China's missile and space programme. Roger would combine his father's engineering talent with the medical interests of his mother, a nurse.

Roger had an early passion for chemistry. Despite his Chinese name (which means 'always healthy'), childhood asthma often kept him indoors, reading and drawing. He fought going to kindergarten until his teacher allowed him to bring in a favourite book: he picked All about the Wonders of Chemistry. From the age of eight, he performed increasingly complex and sometimes hazardous chemistry experiments at home. At 16, he went to Harvard University in Cambridge, Massachusetts (avoiding the Massachusetts Institute of Technology, where his father, uncles and brothers studied), and sampled many subjects. Ironically he found the chemistry courses “so distasteful” that he abandoned them for neurobiology.

Roger then spent nine years at the Physiological Laboratory at the University of Cambridge, UK. First he was a PhD student with the eminent muscle physiologist Richard Adrian; then he did a postdoc with one of us (T.J.R.). He emerged as an ingenious, largely self-taught synthetic chemist.

Much of Roger's early work was directed at imaging neural activity, by trying to develop tracers of sodium- or calcium-ion movements that support brain signalling. By 1980, he had invented quin2, a synthetic fluorescent dye that selectively binds to calcium, and had devised a clever way to sneak this dye and other probes into intact cells. This first practical probe for calcium found wide early use in studies of intracellular calcium signalling.

Amazingly, Roger struggled to find a faculty position because his work straddled disciplines. In 1982, he joined the physiology department at the University of California, Berkeley, where colleagues encouraged him to create more tools. First came superior calcium dyes, in particular fura2, which is strongly excited by different wavelengths of ultraviolet light before and after binding calcium. Capitalizing on this feature of fura2 (and indicators with similar optical properties), Roger and his group made it much easier to monitor calcium under challenging conditions, for example, across the width of a cell. His group also created valuable fluorescent sensors for pH and for sodium.

In 1989, facing resource constraints, Roger transferred to the University of California, San Diego (UCSD). Here he remained for the rest of his career. He wanted to make sensors that could be genetically encoded, allowing researchers to target specific cell types without having to inject a tracer. In the 1990s, he saw the potential of GFP. The protein had been isolated from jellyfish in the 1960s by Osamu Shimomura (who shared the 2008 Nobel) and cloned by Douglas Prasher in 1992. Martin Chalfie, who also shared in the Nobel, first used GFP to image living cells in 1994.

Roger's lab pioneered the development of GFP variants. Through a combination of rational design and random mutagenesis, they created dozens of bright fluorescent proteins of various colours based on GFP. Roger later produced longer-wavelength sensors based on red fluorescent proteins. He took great pleasure in naming probes after fruits such as the tomato, cherry and plum.

GFP variants are now ubiquitous in biological research. They can be used to bind with and track cancer cells, aid gene therapy, image mitosis, paint neurons in rainbow colours and spy on signalling in subcellular organelles such as mitochondria. They have even been used to make art.

Roger's group at UCSD developed many other optical probes, including fast-response sensors to measure electrical signals across cell membranes, and dyes for tracking proteins with a combination of light and electron microscopy. In recent years, he had two main projects: the design of fluorescent tracers to illuminate tumours during cancer surgery; and the storage of long-term memory by the pattern of holes in the perineuronal net that surrounds neurons in the brain.

Roger's trajectory helped to make it respectable, indeed fashionable, to spend a career inventing reagents and methods. He is named in more than 160 US patents, often as lead inventor. Although naturally keen to participate in the first application of his new tools, he was also generous in providing materials to other scientists.

Roger co-founded three biotech companies that capitalized on his inventions. He semi-seriously quipped to his wife Wendy that, apart from the potential human benefit, the main point of these companies was to provide suitable jobs for his postdocs.

Roger was a fine pianist and briefly considered a musical career. A gifted amateur photographer — a hobby in keeping with his passion for colour and imaging — he enjoyed holidays in the wild outdoors, often taking arduous treks, camera in hand.

Roger will be hugely missed by family, friends, colleagues and the many scientists who appreciated him as a brilliant enabler of scientific progress.

Share this:
34
 
 
To cite this page
MLA style: "Roger Y. Tsien - Biographical". Nobelprize.org. Nobel Media AB 2014. Web. 2 Sep 2016.

錢永健自傳 精選

已有 1546 次閱讀 2016-9-2 05:24 |個人分類:觀點|係統分類:科普集錦|關鍵詞:錢永健 roger tsien 錢學森 諾貝爾    推薦到群組

錢永健自傳

Roger Y. Tsien- Biographical

 

翻譯先生自傳,謹以緬懷先生。您所發明的GFP和錢氏果園,照亮幾代科學家的道路。

譯者:席鵬(北京大學)

 

 

 

問:小學生和諾貝爾獎獲得者有什麽共同點?

答:他們都被逼著寫自傳。

http://www.tsienlab.ucsd.edu/Images/General/IMAGE-%20Composite.jpg

錢永健(Roger Y. Tsien,1952-2016),傑出生物化學家。

1 錢氏果園Tsien’s fruityard,多彩的熒光染料世界。

 

 

祖先和家庭

我的父親錢學榘(1915-1997),來自中國杭州的士大夫階層,在那裏“錢”(Tsien,現在比較常用拚音為Qian)是一個相當常見的姓氏。在公元907年,我34代以前的父係祖先錢鏐,在杭州周邊建立國度(吳越國),並修建了許多民生工程。這封地錢鏐和他的繼任統治下的和平繁榮,直到978,他們投降了宋朝以避免戰火中生靈塗炭。我原以為錢鏐的後裔是我們家族的一個不起眼的小秘密,但這個微妙的事實被人們挖出來並放在了維基百科上(並不是我幹的)。何況,這個也並不能讓我和別人有多麽不同,因為(考慮數學的話),每個人之前的34代人,總共是234之多。 234換算過來大約是170億,大大超過了10世紀的地球人口數目。因此,中國幾乎所有人都有可能是以錢鏐作為祖先,即使不那麽嚴格地通過Y染色體進行傳遞。而到目前為止,最有名的錢姓家族成員是錢學森,他在麥卡錫時代期間被美國驅逐出境,然後成為中華人民共和國的導彈之父。他和我父親是堂兄弟。其他幾位華裔美國生物學家包括錢澤南,現任霍華德休斯醫學研究所的主任,和錢煦,加州大學聖地亞哥分校傑出的生物工程師。以及和我一樣的錢姓中國人,他們與我一樣,和錢鏐大有聯係,所以都是我的遠房親戚。

 

爸爸也熱愛飛行和飛機,這是屬於他那個時代的高科技。在20世紀30年代,他獲得了國家獎學金(清華大學)得以在美國留學。他去了麻省理工學院機械工程係,在那裏,他對飛機發動機進行了係統的研究,提出將水注入排放的廢氣中變成蒸汽,以提高起飛過程中的推力,並獲得碩士學位。還沒等他繼續在美國進行下一步的研究,他就不得不回到中國,在國民黨空軍服役。我父親最好的朋友和工程師同事李懿遙Yao Tsu Li)有一個秀外慧中的妹妹叫李懿穎,誰曾受訓於中國最負盛名的醫療機構----北京協和醫學院擔任護士。我的父親甚至在他們還沒有見麵,就急切地寫信給她,向她表達愛意。而當他們終於見麵後,她發現他不擅言辭與社交,而且陶醉於自己的學術當中。盡管她發現這個男人缺少浪漫,她還是答應嫁給他,或許是因為她對自己在戰火紛飛的中國的發展前景並不看好。我的哥哥,他們的第一個兒子永佑,在婚後不久出生於19453月。那時,父親奉命赴美國擔任聯絡官,努力為中國空軍爭取更多的軍事援助。他不得不翻越喜馬拉雅山到印度,然後乘船,迂回前進以躲避敵人的潛艇,所以他並沒有到達美國,直到日本宣布投降那天。他的努力全都打了水漂。但他知道,中國將在戰後飽受內戰的折磨。不知怎的,他用在國防部的關係,為媽媽和永佑安排來美國。拿到這一許可真是太不容易了,因為排華法案禁止從中國到美國移民,直到1943年才被廢除。那個時侯,每年可以有105個人可以拿到移民資格,而當時名單上有數千人排在我家前麵。

 

據媽媽說,她一直計劃要三個孩子,但這種說法是多年以後我們家有三個孩子時她才說的。生了兩個兒子後,雖然爸爸期待著要一個女孩,但在19522月,我來到了人間。爸爸給我起了我的中國名字永健(音譯Yonchien成為我的英語中間名),但迪克堅持,我的美國名字應該是羅傑Roger。我母親後來告訴我,迪克用他兒時的玩伴Roger的名字為我命名。後來,也許是當我在大學裏,我詢問了有關迪克這個神秘的名字命名。迪克交待,他用著名牛仔演員羅伊·羅傑斯(Roy Rogers)給我命名。我每次跟外人解釋我倆名字的相似性淵源(Richard W. TsienRoger Y. Tsien)時,都得提到這一切,你可以想象許多科學家和他們的秘書都被我們的名字搞混了。我不知道為什麽我的父母選擇了兩種不同的拚音來為我們中間的“永”字注音,但如果他們搞成一樣的,那理查德和我會在文獻數據庫中完全沒有區別(都是Tsien RY)。

 

 

長大:家庭化學實驗

   我的一個最早的記憶,大概是34歲,就是在海邊建一條跨過粗石塊的沙路,我的腳在越過那些粗石塊時被弄傷了。我喜歡畫畫假想城市的地圖,地麵街道上麵或者下麵有高速公路或隧道穿過。這些或許是我未來執迷於橋梁建設和活動映射的第一個跡象。在小學的一段時間我的父母買了吉爾伯特化學集,但我並沒有覺得它很有趣,因為那些實驗顯得那麽遜。後來我在學校圖書館發現了一本書,有較好的實驗和插圖。遺憾的是,我現在不記得這本書的名字或作者,雖然我手抄了實驗的許多草圖,上麵的日期是1960年。這個筆記本目前存放在諾貝爾博物館。我記憶最深的兩個實驗是:1)二氧化矽的花園,將金屬鹽晶體(如氯化鈷,硫酸鎳,硫酸銅)投進矽酸鈉溶液,會長出鮮洋紅,綠色,或藍色的膠裝包衣,從垂直上升樹突上長出新芽; 2)製備強堿(0.5M 氫氧化鈉或氫氧化鉀),該有色液體的強烈紫稀(約0.5毫米)高錳酸鉀的水溶液。作為這種溶液通過濾紙的折疊錐體通過,它的顏色變為一種驚豔的綠色,反映了從MnO4-MnO42-的還原,估計是通過纖維素。200811月,我在瑞典電視台和諾貝爾媒體前重做了這兩個令人驚訝且鮮為人知的演示實驗,來解釋為什麽化學反應讓我如此著迷。這兩個實驗反映了我對那些動人的顏色的早日和持久的癡迷。

2 我們一家1960年,在搬到利文斯頓前的合影。左起:Richard, Louis, 我爸爸,我,我媽媽。

 

1959年,爸爸關閉了他的谘詢公司,並開始在新澤西州的哈裏森為RCA的真空管分部工作。爸爸媽媽找到了一個小鎮,那裏房價經濟,又在方便通勤的距離,並有很好的公立學校讓我們兄弟三個人上學。1是當時的一張照片。他們在新澤西州的利文斯頓選擇了一個蓋新房的開發商,但人家不肯把房子賣給我們,說他們不能容許利文斯頓成為唐人街,而且如果有了華人,那其他美國人就可能不會買這裏的房子了。我的父母向新澤西州州長羅伯特·梅恩(Robert Meyne)發起請願。他的辦公室致函開發商,警告他們種族歧視是非法的。最後的妥協達成:開發商賣給我們的房子由已經被賣了房子完全包圍。而我們三個孩子麵臨的問題是,利文斯頓有很多岩石埋在它的土壤中,那是冰川時代遺留下的。我的父母打定主意要一個體麵的美國式的草地草坪,這就需要去除那些院子裏的岩石。我們必須用車拉走很多石頭,,不僅我們自己的,還有從我們的鄰居那兒來的,當時這塊未被占用的土地就成了大家的垃圾場,至少我們是這麽覺得的。在草坪上的雜草處理上透出濃重的個性差異:爸爸,作為一個不耐煩的機械工程師,希望將雜草一棵一棵連根拔起。而我則是一個偶爾的哮喘型花粉症患者,深深地害怕花粉,所以我提了一種化學方法,在安全距離上施用雜草除草劑。我們試過一次我的方法。雜草慢慢地變成褐色,但最終又長回來了。爸爸宣布實驗失敗,又回到手工除草。我仍然在思考這個結果和我們目前對癌症治療的研究之間的關係。

 

   1960年,RCA關閉了真空管部門,大概是因為半導體取代了真空管,所以爸爸換到了埃索Esso(後更名為埃克森Exxon)研究和工程公司工作。埃索提供更好的項目和工資,所以他在那兒一直呆到他1983年退休。我相信一些能夠讓我我做更有趣的化學實驗的化學品和玻璃器皿是從他們公司庫房轉移過來的。在那些日子裏,其他得用品可以通過郵購的方式獲得,用父母的簽名購買。在接下來的56年,我在我們家的地下室逐漸做了許多無機化學的經典實驗:製備和燃燒氫氣,製備O2和用氧氣燃燒鋼絲,在燒瓶中製備NH3,看它吸水向上,在燒瓶內形成噴泉。我在塑料設備中從氟化鈣+H2SO4中蒸餾HF,並非常開心地看到它腐蝕玻璃的能力。我從一套火車模型中弄到了降壓變壓器及整流器,然後將鎳坩堝為陰極,和從廢手電筒電池弄下來的碳棒作為陽極,用電解法熔融氫氧化鈉。我設法得到非常不純的金屬鈉,在它落入水中時,發出了令人滿意的絲絲聲。煙火自然是我極大的興趣點:我製作並點燃了火藥,做了重鉻酸銨火山實驗,甚至做了鋁粉和氧化鉻產生的壯觀的鋁熱反應。我最雄心勃勃的嚐試是一個多步驟的順序,旨在合成阿司匹林,為此我需要醋酸酐,這不得不從乙酰氯製成,為此我需要三氯化磷,為此我需要在氯氣流中燒紅磷。我試著在連續的橡膠塞燒杯中做這個實驗(圖2),因為我沒有磨口玻璃接頭的玻璃器皿。該腐蝕性化學品把橡膠腐蝕了,所以我沒有獲得乙酰氯後麵的產物。由於我沒有通風櫥,我在後院的一個燒烤架上做更為危險的實驗。回想起來,這一切對於我這樣一個815歲的無監督的男孩的瘋狂行為感到震驚。但它同時也是一個很好的鍛煉,讓你學會如何高效地搭建設備,規劃和實施你的實驗,解釋令人混亂的結果,並決定如何把事情做得更好。這些實驗讓我有足夠的信心,當我必須賺取我作為童子軍的第一個成就徽章時,我義無反顧地選擇了化學。一些更嚴厲的成就徽章,如遠足,需要在一天內進行二十英裏的徒步旅行,我後來也得到了。

3 製備氯氣的裝置並將其與紅磷的反應(1966-1967年),在我們自家的後院有幕天井中。最左邊的燒瓶包含高錳酸鉀與鹽酸水溶液反應,通過捏夾子控製的漏鬥加料。氯氣流經氯化鈣幹燥,然後引導到P4中的環支架上的燒瓶中。因為沒有自來水可用,水冷卻的PCl 3冷凝器從回收牛奶罐虹吸並存入標有“夏威夷雞尾酒”的廢罐頭瓶中。對PCL3的接收浸沒在暖瓶裏麵的冰中。在酒精燈輔助加熱的磷。注意到處都是橡膠瓶塞。

 

 

小學到高中:西屋科學天才搜索

   學校通常是可以忍受的,但生活經常十分無聊。我期待著天冬天的時候下大雪關閉學校,這樣我就可以花一天時間玩雪橇。我在學校球類,如足球,籃球,壘球表現非常糟糕,因為我年紀小,不擅長運動,比我的同學要小一兩歲,這是一個巨大的差異。但是,我在高中人氣很足,以高票當選學生會的會計。

 

   媽媽極力在放學回家後教我們中文,但我越長達,越發現這些經驗教訓十分乏味。我能夠以兒童水平極好地理解中文口語(如中文的“清理你的房間!”被永久地刻入我的大腦中),但是卻不願意說出來,我自己,由於心願(移民的兒童中太常見了)從我父母的口音上,並在他們強烈的的種族和傳統自豪感上,與自己刻意拉開距離。同樣,我對吃中國菜的抵製讓他們感到絕望(就像一個“洋鬼子”),尤其是最正宗的菜肴,具有強烈的味道或氣味的食物,或那些雜七雜八的動物肉的做法。

 

   我第一次接觸到的科研環境是在1967年,俄亥俄大學國家科學基金會資助的暑期研究計劃,在那裏我被分配在羅伯特·克萊因(Robert Kline)教授的實驗室工作的硫氰酸鹽(SCN-)。皮爾遜理論的軟硬配體和金屬的結合是一個全新的時髦理論,所以克萊恩教授要我找出,是否硫氰酸可以同時與它的“軟”硫磺綁定到某種軟金屬,以及“硬”氮到某種硬金屬上,如PhHg-SCN-鉻(Ⅲ)。他希望硫氰酸鹽的紅外線吸收率會告訴我們,這樣橋接是否正在發生。我準備了很多界限不清的無定形沉澱,並測量了它們的紅外光譜。在1967年的冬天,我在利文斯頓高中年級時,我參加了西屋科學獎,一個全國範圍的科學競賽賽事。(這個年度的盛事現在依然存在,雖然讚助於1998年被英特爾替代),由於缺乏任何替代方案,我寫了我在俄亥俄大學的項目,盡我所能從可疑數據的混亂得出一些結論。克萊恩教授在很大程度上否認這些結論,指出我的準備工作沒有給予正確的碳,氫,氮微量分析。 40名入圍者被召集到華盛頓,在19683月進行采訪和公開海報會議。我記得我被同時入圍的決賽選手羨慕,他們比我更年也更複雜。同時他們的項目和展品似乎比我更令人興奮和易於解釋。我感覺自己被高級法官,格倫·西博格(Glenn Seaborg)嚇倒,部分原因是因為他的職位的高度,部分原因是因為他是美國原子能委員會的主席,還有部分是因為他獲得1951年諾貝爾獎的無機化學的工作。頒獎典禮是對我們每個人來說都是非常緊張的,因為十個獎學金獲獎者以相反的順序宣布,迫使每個人都希望自己的名字被念到,但越晚越好。我依然不明白我如何獲得的一等獎,盡管我的項目的不夠周全,而且我對科學比賽這件事兒看不順眼。爸爸的一句話讓我能夠不飄在天上:當我打電話給家裏,他的第一個意見是,這是一件好事啊,我現在有$ 10,000的獎學金,因為他最近在股市上輸了不少錢。其中我收到的最滿意的恭維是,那個不想賣給我爸媽房子的開發商,現在用我的照片在廣告中為當地教育質量的證據之一。

 

 

哈佛

   19684月,我必須在四個學院之間進行選擇:哥倫比亞大學,麻省理工學院,加州理工學院,和哈佛大學。爸爸否決了哥倫比亞,因為那年春天的學潮,我也不介意這一決定,因為我想離開新澤西州。我拒絕了MIT,因為迪克和路易斯都去那裏了,我受夠了與他們比來比去。加州理工學院的本科小班製度聽起來很誘人,但我最後還是決定不去加州理工,因為理查德·費曼已經不再教物理學導論,也因為他們的音樂係非常小,與哈佛相比簡直可以忽略不計。事實上,哈佛也變成我人生值得歡呼的經曆。與同學的友誼是幫助我成長的關鍵。1969年和1970年春天那次學生抗議活動提供了我第一次接觸大麻,警察暴力和參與政治的經曆。課程的多樣性讓我接觸到藝術史,視覺設計,經濟學,殖民史,憲法學,心理學,以及音樂理論和室內樂演出,等等。諷刺的是,最壞的課程是那些旨在帶領哈佛的精英化學專業的學生到科研事業的課程。這些必修課程是如此討厭,讓我最終放棄了化學。為了尋找替代品,我涉獵了分子生物學,海洋學,相對論量子力學,和天體物理學(由沃爾特·吉爾伯特主講,他後來分享了DNA測序的諾貝爾獎)。但我最終還是選擇了神經生物學,部分原因是大腦和心靈之間的關係似乎是哲學在科學中最重要的問題,另一部分是因為大衛胡貝爾,約翰·尼科爾斯和托斯滕·威塞爾(David Hubel, John Nicholls, and Torsten Wiese)領銜了一門課程,忽悠本科生成為神經科學家。胡貝爾和威塞爾仍然在做視覺皮層,最終他們贏得了1981年的諾貝爾醫學獎或生理學研究。我問胡貝爾教授,我能否在他們的實驗室做暑期實習,但他告訴我他們沒有給本科生的空間了,並建議我申請馬薩諸塞州眼耳醫院的尼爾森 Nelson Kiang)的實驗室。在夏季1971年,藏教授給我一個神經生理學和有趣的項目,分析聽覺耳蝸核的衝動序列。近四十年後,我仍然在神經生物學問題上刻苦鑽研。

 

 

劍橋

當我問胡貝爾和藏教授在何處申請神經科學研究生學校的意見時,他們的分歧很大,隻有一點達成了一致,那就是最頂尖的研究是馬薩諸塞州劍橋市和英國的劍橋。我覺得是時候離開馬薩諸塞州劍橋市以拓寬我的視野了,所以我申請了馬歇爾獎學金去到了另一個劍橋。早在1972年,我,作為一個哈佛的大四學生,已經知道我的申請成功了,而我的博士導師將是一個叫做R. H.阿德裏安博士(Dr. R. H. Adrian)的人,而他的大名我之前從來沒有耳聞。我打電話給我的弟弟迪克,他從牛津大學心髒電生理專業獲得博士學位後,剛剛成為耶魯大學的助理教授。迪克告訴我,R. H.阿德裏安是英國最傑出的肌肉電生理學家之一,而他的老爸E. D.阿德裏安,是諾貝爾神經生理學獎得主。另外,R. H.阿德裏安是迪克的博士外審評委之一。“但是肌肉是一潭死水,”我感歎道。“我想做大腦的工作。”迪克向我保證,理查德阿德裏安是一位真正的英國紳士,他願意讓我做我自己選擇的課題。所以我決定以靜觀其變。經過一個夏天在巴黎附近的楓丹白露鑽研音樂後,我於197210月到達劍橋。我在丘吉爾學院第一頓午餐,一位貴族打扮的紳士坐在我對麵,問我是不是羅傑錢永健。我馬上意識到他一定是理查德阿德裏安,因為老外裏麵隻有那些認識我的家庭成員的人才能正確地發音我們的姓,而他剛剛做到了。我們談話的最初幾分鍾內,他問:“難道你真的覺得肌肉是一潭死水?”我不得不承認他這一評述的準確性。(我後來發現,那年夏天他們參加了同一個會議,在那兒迪克惡作劇地取笑了阿德裏安這個研究。)阿德裏安痛苦地看著我同意這一點,但馬上說,今後無論何時我想轉學到係裏某一真正的神經生理學領域,他都不會反對。

 

就這樣,我開始了我的博士訓練。我從來沒有換過導師,因為我很快就意識到我不喜歡做傳統中樞神經係統的電生理。傳統的論文課題基本上遵循由胡貝爾和威塞爾成功地采用的範例,是一個細胞外微電極植入麻醉動物的腦並記錄單個神經元的活性,同時提供感官刺激。經過幾百個這樣的記錄,人們可以對不同的反應模式分類,並發表一篇論文和一些出版物。對我來說,這似乎太像冰釣,也就是在冰湖上切一個洞,投下魚線放入不透明的水下,並耐心地等待魚來咬鉤。大腦擁有調動數萬億並行工作的神經元的能力,所以我想看到大量的神經元信號是如何同時彼此交互和處理信息的。理想情況下,人們會對神經元進行染色,當神經元發射動作電位時,染料明顯亮起或改變顏色。一些市售的染料確實已經發現能夠反映神經動作電位,但它們的光學反應是極其微小的,例如熒光的10-4 10-5的變化。

 

   隻有在高度簡化條件下,數千個由研究者驅動的動作電位求平均時,信號才能被檢測到。為了檢測在一個複雜的腦源性信號,需要提升好幾個的數量級的改進。在1972年的冬天,我貿然決定我會盡力為成像特定目的神經元活動而設計並合成新的染料。一個策略是靶向染料鈉通道,它被認存在於產生動作電位經受大的構象變化附近。另一種策略是打造“電致變色染料”,在偶極矩基態和激發態之間產生巨大變化,從而使神經細胞膜電位的變化可能會改變吸光率或熒光的峰值波長。在這兩種情況下,我都不得不學習有機結合,這正是我所恨透的哈佛的那些化學課程,而我們現在的生理實驗室已經無人能教我了。幸運的是,化學係的一個新來的教師,大三學生教員伊恩·巴克斯特博士(Ian Baxter),是理查德·阿德裏安的一個朋友的朋友,對我提出的靶向鈉通道很感興趣,並同意非官方地成為我的導師。巴克斯特沒有其他的學生,因此有時間、善良和耐心,每天數次,看看我的進展,並告訴我必要的技術。我發現我自己都感到驚訝,那就是我開始可以享受有機合成,當我為我自己選擇的一個生物目標奮鬥的時候。我仍然對這種類型的研究大呼過癮,即使我合成的分子被證明不能結合鈉通道,盡管巴克斯特很快就離開了劍橋,成為英格蘭北部的職業顧問,甚至哪怕我合成電壓傳感器的等被證明不如那些由其他實驗室篩選大量市售染料及其非常近似的結構時。

 

我如果想獲得一絲的成功,需要轉移到另一個生物目標。為產生任何生物效應,動作電位幾乎總是產生大量增加的細胞內鈣,如神經遞質,以激發或抑製該途徑的下一個神經元的釋放。在1975年人們因為發現偶氮胂III而非常興奮,它原一種為了測量在核廢料的重金屬而發明的染料,人們發現它也可以用於監測從烏賊神經元巨軸突所釋放的鈣,雖然從該染料的信號是很小的,而且有點含糊不清。我認為,設計某種染料來測量鈣流,應該比設計染料來追蹤在神經元膜電位的快速變化更為容易。眾所周知,化學文獻中數百種染料可以和鈣離子發生反應,例如測定水的硬度。真正的問題是,在細胞內,遊離Mg2+的濃度大約比Ca2+4個數量級,從而使細胞內的Ca2+指示劑需要更高的選擇性來超過它的姐妹離子Mg2+。而化學家還沒有認識到這種有選擇性的標記物的生物方麵的需求。一種叫做EGTA的無色緩衝液是已知的Ca2+:Mg2+的選擇性上合成的唯一分子,但它從未被製作成任何類型的染料分子。通過塗鴉在紙上和玩分子模型,我想到了一個方法,使EGTA變成非常簡陋的染料分子。我開始沒有告訴理查德阿德裏安這個全新的項目,因為任何謹慎的導師都會告訴我,我應該把舊的項目結束,而不是開始全新的。幸運的是,在幾個星期內我成功地得到目標分子的一小塊不純樣品(後給出的縮寫“BAPTA”),並發現它具有對Ca2+的預期光學響應,同時具有極高的Ca2+:Mg2+選擇性。經過許多年和發現,從BAPTA 後裔發展出的更好的染料成為最流行的方式,來觀察內源性細胞內Ca2+信號,篩選鏈接到的Ca2+信號配體和受體,並用於在顯微鏡下成像神經元活動。

 

   獲得博士學位後,我留在劍橋岡維爾與凱斯學院(Gonville & Caius College)作為博士後研究員。我向Ca2 +信號的變化的研究重點轉移,促進了我與蒂莫西瑞克(TimothyRink)博士,他是生理實驗室的一個新教員。蒂姆想用一些從瑞士發來的材料中,開發鈣離子選擇性電極。但說明書是德語寫的,蒂姆無法閱讀。當時我已經學會讀德文的化學論文,所以我翻譯了說明。我們的合作開始於這些鈣離子選擇性電極,並延伸到我的鈣離子熒光指示劑的生物測試和開發中。更重要的是,1976年蒂姆和他的妻子諾瑪邀請我參加他們的聖誕晚會,在那裏我第一次見到他們的妻妹(sister in law),溫迪。很快,每到周末,我就去她在北倫敦的房子看她。當蒂姆和諾瑪發現了數個月後,他們對自己完全無意的牽線搭橋的效果感覺相當驚訝。溫迪(圖45)仍然是我一生的摯愛。

 

4  Wendy和我們的狗Kiri2004.

 

 

   幸運之神眷顧了我。加州大學伯克利分校的生理學與解剖學係,有一個助理教授職位空缺。招聘委員會主席被特裏瑪沁(TerryMachen),當時剛好在劍橋休年假,我剛好認識了他。同時,伯克利有兩個教師,理查德·斯坦哈特(Richard Steinhardt)和羅伯特·朱克(Robert Zucker),對Ca2+信號感興趣。這些連接使我能夠獲得伯克利分校的應聘機會。幸運的是,鈣離子的熒光指示劑終於敏感到能夠直接測量淋巴細胞胞質鈣離子的濃度,包括由於促有絲分裂而帶來的提升。現在,人們可以研究Ca2 +信號在小的哺乳動物細胞群體,而先前的技術需要個頭非常大、非常強壯的單細胞,足以承受顯微注射。這一前景,與我在生理學獲得博士學位的事實放在一起,說服了係裏給我助理教授的職位,而我歡樂地接收了這個offer之後,才發現伯克利正遭受金融危機。我的實驗室在1982年初的啟動經費被縮減到隻有幾千美元,而每個采購的項目必須是合理的替代陳舊的教學設備。例如,為了給我訂購一台紫外燈用於觀看薄層色譜板,從教學實驗室的舊顯微鏡照明必須報廢。更重要的是,該係沒有資源,提供通風櫥,而我繼續合成鈣指標需要用到它。羅伯特·麥西教授(Robert Macey),他的實驗室在我旁邊,惠贈我一套老通風櫃,包括其不可替代的延伸到建築物的屋頂管道係統。對於我的其餘的在伯克利任教的七年間,我們所有的合成反應發生都是在這個木通風櫃中完成的,它不到4英尺寬,鐵絲網深深嵌入前窗的玻璃中。整個實驗室因為儲物櫃沒有蓋子而充斥著刺鼻的味道,當使用過量溴乙酸乙酯反應必須在通風櫥外完成時,整個實驗室就成了一個大的催淚瓦斯。提到這些苦日子,隻為了提醒年輕的科學家,一些好的研究可以用不奢華的設施和啟動資金來完成。

 

盡管有這些曲折,我在伯克利的科研卓有成效,包括和瑪沁、斯坦哈特、朱克,以及其他人的合作。我招了Grzegorz GrynkiewiczAkwasiMinta,他們合成了大幅改進的鈣流染料(fura-2, indo-1,fluo-3)和鈉流染料(SBFI),所有這些被沿用至今。在經濟危機緩解後,伯克利幫我買了一個簡陋的圖像處理器,我痛苦地編程控製它來計算在兩個交互激發的波長情況下熒光的比值。這一實時比值揭示了Ca2+, Na+, pH 信號在單個活細胞中的變化,而且常常是以前所未有的高時空分辨率的。

 

 

搬到UCSD

   然而,我開始擔心被困在成像無機離子的職業生涯當中。我想探索通過更複雜的生物如cAMP信號(cyclic 3',5-adenosine monophosphate)和更廣泛的、更時尚的生物大分子相互作用的世界。我議價能力的增長,讓我也想要一個實驗室有足夠的通風櫃,通風櫃,小暗室熒光顯微鏡來支持我的不尋常的化學與生物學的結合,以及在化學係和霍華德休斯醫學研究所聯合任命。在伯克利,上述條件沒有一個是可能的。所以在1989,我們搬到南部的加利福尼亞大學,聖地亞哥,直到現在。UCSD滿足了我以上的奢求,而且它更年輕,更寬敞,成長更快的,與伯克利比起來更不受傳統的束縛,我比較之後感覺這些優勢足以彌補它名氣小的劣勢。我諾貝爾演講中詳述了我在UCSD的科學亮點。

5 Wendy和我,一起正裝出席諾貝爾頒獎會。

 

結論

寫這個自傳提醒了我,我的職業生涯是如何被機會和命運塑造成這樣的奇怪的混合物。利用化學來建立生物有用的分子是一種工程,所以我沒有逃脫我的父親,叔叔和兄弟建立的傳統範式。然而,我避免了他們選擇的機械、航空、電氣和計算機專業,可能是因為像許多年輕的同胞們一樣,我不得不尋求一個獨特的生態位。但是,如果我沒有Ian Baxter重新灌輸我享受化學,也許我會選擇另一個方向。我對多發性色彩的成像的興趣也反映了童年早期的視覺興趣,讓我有幸能夠將興趣與職業相結合。從嚴格的生物學的角度來看,我們的貢獻主要是在技術的發展。人造技術確實有一種將被淘汰的趨勢,而關於自然如何工作的基本發現應該永遠持續下去。但真正的根本性洞見,如達爾文和沃森與克裏克是極其罕見的,經常飽受激烈的競爭。而一旦能解決重要的問題,成功的技術發展使得凡人至少產生幾年的廣泛的有利影響。此外,同樣的工程方法是創造新的治療策略,以減輕疾病,而不僅僅是我們科研人員的工具。

 

 

 

原文地址:

https://www.nobelprize.org/nobel_prizes/chemistry/laureates/2008/tsien-bio.html

 

本文歡迎轉載,請注明及出處。因作者水平有限,錯漏之處在所難免,歡迎留言指正!



http://blog.sciencenet.cn/blog-499502-1000464.html

上一篇:人性善惡討論的終極答案

2 李穎業 李勝文

發表評論 評論 (4 個評論)

[4]李勝文  2016-9-2 09:18
 
He kept much in himself most of time - not with that pictured smile much, popping up some jokes sometimes both in his talks and in conversation. That's my impression in his presence. R.I.P.
[3]shatan  2016-9-2 08:48
 
有一個秀外慧中的妹妹叫李懿穎,誰曾受訓於中國最負盛名的醫療機構----北京協和醫學院擔任護士
---------------------------------
此處的“who”應該譯為“她”,而不是“誰”。
[2]席鵬  2016-9-2 05:37
 
改了,多謝提醒!
[1]李穎業  2016-9-2 05:33
 
他和我的父親是親表兄弟
--------------------------------------
英語裏表兄弟和堂兄弟都是cousin,這裏應該譯成堂兄弟
[ 打印 ]
閱讀 ()評論 (1)
評論
目前還沒有任何評論
登錄後才可評論.