回他一記耳光

那個“Steve”（參見【[i]】）繼續扯謊如下：

當天在我用他們的online界麵投稿時確實第一次因為沒有在界麵上指定聯係人所以沒有通過，隨即也收到他們的一個email（附錄1），但我馬上就按照要求補上了，順利地完成正式submit。而且他們的界麵設計是如果不補齊那些內容根本不允許最後完成submit，而是會馬上在屏幕上顯示錯誤信息。

在我所upload的file裏麵明確地有按照他們的要求寫的no competed interest statement （附錄2）如下：

【Statements and Declarations

There is no competing interests in any sense for this paper. No funding for this research.】

不僅如此，在他們的界麵上我也選擇了無利益衝突如下：

我也明確提供了Author Contribution Statement 如下：

下麵是我申明no funding及指定聯係人：

下麵是在用他們的界麵submit之前的所有declarations的總結：

現在被我發現他們冒充我withdrew之後，居然說我沒有完成他們要求的內容。他們似乎忘了，他們自己的係統設計是如果發現不滿足他們的要求，根本就無法完成“submit”，而是馬上會在屏幕上看到錯誤信息。

最可氣的是，因為Foundations of Science是一份哲學雜誌，所以他們的declarations根本沒涉及動物實驗的內容，這個“Steve”現在居然還造出一個動物實驗的申明來。

可見他們耍的就是一拖二騙三無賴的花招，而他們賭的就是作者在submit的過程沒有留證，那樣的話日後可以任他們胡說八道！！！這就是騙子如何行詐的一個證據！

當我順利完成submit之後，就又收到他們的一個email證實我以完成submission（見附錄3），然後就從未收到他們的任何一個email，直到我發現有人冒充我撤稿後主動給他們發了email。

所以，今天在我收到“Steve”繼續耍賴的email後，隨手回他一記耳光如下：

總結：

1）不要和騙子來往！

2）萬一非要和騙子來往或不確定對方是否為騙子，一定要注意留證。這是一個不可信的世界！

 

附錄 1. 我在submit過程中他們的第一個email

---

 

附錄2. 我在Submit的最後一步從他們那裏下載的我所submit的原稿的Title Page

Title:      When Philosophy is Disparaged

Author: Rongqing Dai, independent researcher

Email: [e-mail]

Abstract

Human beings are paying a dire price for disparaging philosophy in all facets of life, especially in the field of natural science where the most intelligent explorations of nature for the survival and advance of Homo sapiens species are supposed to be conducted. In the mean time, the professional discipline crowned with the title “philosophy” has been haunted by its own collective and systematic pitfalls. Consequently, despite of the apparent rapid growing global prosperity, the earth civilization is indeed walking at a fast pace down to a deep crisis. To make matters much worse, due to its intelligent challenge, the weakened collective philosophical capacity in the world is not something that can be made up with some crash courses as for scientific and technological trainings.

This writing will demonstrate through examples how philosophically erroneous mistakes in mathematics and physics could last for decades or even centuries. In addition, this writing will also discuss the devastating stale status of the existing academia of philosophy as well as the need and vision of having a parallel new professional community of philosophy.

Keywords: Philosophy, Hilbert First Problem, Special Relativity, Energy Conservation, Metaphysics, Quantum

Statements and Declarations

There is no competing interests in any sense for this paper. No funding for this research.

 

附錄3.  7月22日投稿後收到的email confirmation:

 

---

【[i]】 騙子的嘴臉繼續暴露