今天的物理學界怎麽這麽白癡加不要臉？

不久前我將我的一篇題為“The Fall of Special Relativity and The Absoluteness of Space and Time”【[1]】的文章投稿給The European Physical Journal Plus。今天收到他們的編輯的報告說我在文章引用了Gibbs在1995年的文章，而Gibbs文章是支持光速不變的，所以我的文章一定錯了。

這個編輯是根本沒有閱讀能力還是吃錯藥了還是要麽就是白癡？？？

我在那篇文章中引用的文獻何止那一篇說光速是常量？這與我否定光速是常量有什麽關係？我在中文文章中也照樣引用過Gibbs的那篇文章，我用那篇文章是為了說明不僅我從未找到過愛因斯坦說在引力場中光速不是常量，而且其他人如Gibbs也沒找到。至於Gibbs他自己是否認為光速是常量關我的文章個屁事？？？

那個編輯不去讀我的文章的相關論述，而專門在Gibbs的文章中找出GIbbs認為光速是常量的部分來。他怎麽就跳過了Gibbs文章中提到沒有人證明愛因斯坦說引力場中的光速是常量那部分呢？這到底是無賴還是白癡呢？？？

他怎麽把Gibbs個人的觀點看得比愛因斯坦還重？？難道Gibbs是他爺爺？？？

今天歐美的物理學雜誌的編輯怎麽就那麽無賴加白癡呢？？？？

下麵是那個白癡的comment:

【The author spends a long time arguing against the constancy of the speed of light (denoted by "c"). But the author's references include:

Gibbs, P. (1996). “Is The Speed of Light Constant?”. Updated by Carlip S. (1997). Retrieved

from:

https://www.desy.de/user/projects/Physics/Relativity/SpeedOfLight/speed_of_light.html

To quote from that reference.

"In special relativity, the speed of light is constant when measured in any inertial frame.  In general relativity, the appropriate generalisation is that the speed of light is constant in any freely falling reference frame (in a region small enough that tidal effects can be neglected)."

"If general relativity is correct, then the constancy of the speed of light in inertial frames is a tautology from the geometry of spacetime.  The causal structure of the universe is determined by the geometry of "null vectors".  Travelling at the speed c means following world-lines tangent to these null vectors.  The use of c as a conversion between units of metres and seconds, as in the SI definition of the metre, is fully justified on theoretical grounds as well as practical terms, because c is not merely the speed of light, it is a fundamental feature of the geometry of spacetime."

The author should heed his references.】

上麵這段評論是該編輯是無賴加白癡的證據。下麵是他低水平的直接表現：

【

This paper presents a number of "contradictions" in the now standard understanding of Special Relativity (SR), and in smaller space some "carry-over" misunderstandings of General Relativity (GR). These are issues that were argued in the decades after the introduction of Special Relativity, and were well settled, even though still disputed by "hold outs" 45 years after the publication of SR. But there is no coherent argument against the standard SR/GR interpretations at this time.

In particular this paper presents none. For instance the author argues against Einstein's definition of simultaneity in SR. He argues against the use of observation of muons at the surface of the Earth as demonstration of SR -- arguing that analysing from a frame moving with the muon leads to a contradiction to an analysis done in a frame on the surface of the Earth. That statement is INCORRECT.

】

他居然用我的文章對抗了現有的理論為理由來否定我的文章！什麽東西呀！你有本事說出我錯在哪裏，你個X八X，居然說隻要違背了現有的理論就是錯！這就是今天的歐美物理學界的水平？？？！！！-----這個歐洲物理學雜誌的編輯部在美國，所以他們的水平就是歐美的綜合水平的代表！！！

 

---

[[1]] Dai, R. (2022). “The Fall of Special Relativity and The Absoluteness of Space and Time”. Retrieved from: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/363582341_The_Fall_of_Special_Relativity_and_The_Absoluteness_of_Space_and_Time

[慕容青草]

其實，從我在“找到他們修改愛因斯坦廣相假設的原因了”和“廣義相對論看來也問題重重”的討論可以看出，今天的物理學界之所以必須假設在重力場中的光速為常量是因為愛因斯坦他自己一麵假設重力場中的光速可以是變量一麵要求ds為不隨坐標變換而改變的invariant造成的，根本不是Gibbs那個可笑的邏輯決定的。Gibbs的論述不過是中學生或最多是大本的照本宣科的水平而已，而這樣的水平正好適合今天歐美的物理學界，所以那位白癡編輯就轉門引用了Gibbs的狗屁不通的論述，而跳過Gibbs在同一篇文章中提到的愛因斯坦本人認為重力場中的光速不是常量這一點。真是XX的不要臉！！！！

[慕容青草]

下麵這句話就是我在那篇文章中提到Gibbs的文章的片段：

【

However, it is interesting to notice that we even cannot find any proof that Einstein ever claimed that the speed of light in the gravitational field is constant (Gibbs 1996 [[i]]); instead, we can see from multiple writings (Einstein1916, 1912b [4, [ii]]) that Einstein reasoned why we could not assume the constancy of the speed of light in the gravitational field.

[[i]] Gibbs, P. (1996). “Is The Speed of Light Constant?”. Updated by Carlip S. (1997). Retrieved from: https://www.desy.de/user/projects/Physics/Relativity/SpeedOfLight/speed_of_light.html

[[ii]] Einstein, A. (1912b) “The speed of light and the statics of the gravitational field”. Translated by D. H. Delphenich.“Lichtgeschwindigkeit und Statik des Gravitionsfeldes,” Ann. Phys. (Leipzig) 38 (1912), 355-369. Available at: http://neo-classical-physics.info/uploads/3/4/3/6/34363841/einstein_-_speed_of_light_and_grav.pdf

】

下麵這段是Gibbs那篇文章中唯一與我一致的地方，也是我提到他的文章的原因：

【

Einstein went on to discover a more general theory of relativity which explained gravity in terms of curved spacetime, and he talked about the speed of light changing in this new theory. In the 1920 book "Relativity: the special and general theory" he wrote: . . . according to the general theory of relativity, the law of the constancy of the velocity of light in vacuo, which constitutes one of the two fundamental assumptions in the special theory of relativity [. . .] cannot claim any unlimited validity. A curvature of rays of light can only take place when the velocity of propagation of light varies with position. Since Einstein talks of velocity (a vector quantity: speed with direction) rather than speed alone, it is not clear that he meant the speed will change, but the reference to special relativity suggests that he did mean so. This interpretation is perfectly valid and makes good physical sense, but a more modern interpretation is that the speed of light is constant in general relativity.

】

X的，那個X八X編輯跳過這個關鍵的地方，專挑Gibbs他自己認為光速必須是常量的地方。。。。人人都知道愛因斯坦，誰知道他Gibbs是誰呀。。。。那個X八X編輯那Gibbs的話來不但否定我的話也否定了愛因斯坦。。。。這個編輯真是個白癡加無賴------這就是今天歐美物理學界的水平！！！！！！！！！！！！！！！！