回複扮豬吃老鼠: 好吧，我把你的flow完完整整寫出來

扮豬吃老鼠 Said:
好吧，我把你的flow完完整整寫出來:
基督存在（或者個人相信基督存在）-〉聖經正確-〉聖經創世紀正確-〉聖經說植物在太陽之前創造，加上證據二：植物需要足夠的光才能生存-〉在太陽創造之前就有足夠的光
我再給你提供證據：植物短時間（24小時）無光也無大礙
所以聖經說植物在太陽之前創造，加上證據：植物短時間（24小時）無光也無大礙-〉創造太陽之前無光也無大礙
所以聖經不一定indicates創造太陽之前就有“足夠的光”。
請問，你為什麽pre select證據？為什麽你對我列出的證據不理不睬？你需要額外的理由，說明你為什麽使用你的證據，而不理睬我的證據？而且你一口咬定聖經上說的就是按照你的邏輯來推理的，為什麽？

NewCommer Replied:

Dear friend 扮豬吃老鼠: Please read careful the the original writings below from both of us. Are they the same?

NewCommer’s writing:
(Copy-and-Paste from 回複扮豬吃老鼠 -NewCommer-♂ 4/26/07)

“If GOD is True. Then Bile is accountable. Then what documented in the Bible is true. Then It is TURE that God Created light in day1, God Created plant in Day3 and God Created Sun in Day4.) Then it is True that plant were created and SURVIVED before there was sun but after there was light. Then it is true that there was no light-related survival problem of plant.”

扮豬吃老鼠\' writing:
( Copy-and-Paste from 好吧，我把你的flow完完整整寫出來 -扮豬吃老鼠-♂) 4/26/07)

好吧，我把你的flow完完整整寫出來:
基督存在（或者個人相信基督存在）-〉聖經正確-〉聖經創世紀正確-〉聖經說植物在太陽之前創造，加上證據二：植物需要足夠的光才能生存-〉在太陽創造之前就有足夠的光