落花, 看到這個有關CGM MARD和你分享。雖然libre 3 MARD 數值比 G7好,但是很多人實際體驗沒有G7準

本文內容已被 [ fitness2022 ] 在 2024-03-10 21:44:04 編輯過。如有問題,請報告版主或論壇管理刪除.

At ATTD, details around Roche CGM came out at a plenary session; the product is 'pre-CE Mark' but Roche noted on 2.1.24, it was 'very close' to launching. From what we can see, the product is promoted as having 14-day wear, a MARD of 9.2%, Apple Watch connectivity, a 2-hour glucose prediction curve and 30 min and night low prediction. The form factor looks larger than either ABT or DXCM and compares to DXCM G7 and ABT L3 MARDs of ~8.2% and 7.8% and 10- and 14-day wear, respectively (and DXCM's Stelo and aspirations for the G-Series to reach 15 days).

MARD alone is not the best accuracy marker and should not be used as the sole parameter to characterize the accuracy of CGM systems. MARD uses only a small portion of CGM data in its calculation, doesn't tell us much about comparative performance at low glucose levels (where some CGMs have struggled) and does not account for additional information like trend and rate of change given by CGMs. On that point, investors have been asking about whether Roche's longer-timeframe prediction algos could be an advantage. We note MDT has promoted similar features in the past with its low SG forecast (hypo prediction up to 4 hours in advance) and other predictive alerts. DXCM has been relatively dismissive of this approach, noting a lot can change in the real world, making longer-term predictions a moving target. 

所有跟帖: 

落花:別煩我,皮疼呢。真是的 -fuz- 給 fuz 發送悄悄話 fuz 的博客首頁 (0 bytes) () 03/11/2024 postreply 06:55:36

就是就是,成天想著那百分幾的的誤差,老子的皮膚問題才是切膚的重要問題啊啊啊啊 -落花飄零- 給 落花飄零 發送悄悄話 落花飄零 的博客首頁 (0 bytes) () 03/11/2024 postreply 08:49:06

我以前就說過 -落花飄零- 給 落花飄零 發送悄悄話 落花飄零 的博客首頁 (857 bytes) () 03/11/2024 postreply 08:48:16

請您先登陸,再發跟帖!