提上來仰視一下

本文內容已被 [ Nonsense123 ] 在 2012-04-04 16:27:13 編輯過。如有問題,請報告版主或論壇管理刪除.

這兒不是大教授就是software architect。牛人也太多了。怎麽都跑來當掏糞工啦?

我看你寫的笑噴了。architect的任務就是與人argue啊?還是單純寫code來得輕鬆愉快。不過architect的工資高。以後調動還是麻煩了。每個公司用的平台啊技術啊都不同。

a few years ago, I became so-call architecture

 

 

來源:  於  [] [博客舊帖] [轉至博客] [給我悄悄話] 本文已被閱讀:15次
回答: 現在怎麽不同了? 由 Nonsense123 於 2012-04-04 12:53:28

coding work was done by people in India/China. The task for architecture was to design, but actually it was arguing around, challenged by people who knew nothing about the system. Because they knew nothing, in order to show their value to the project, they often raised stupid questions.

In 2004, we only had 3 people, took care one release, achieved zero production defect. We discussed issues and solutions by standing in our cubicle. In 2007, there were more than 10 people took equivalent work load. As we had had 2004 experience, it was supposed that it would need less time to do 2007 one. Too bad, it was not the case. Tons of production defects after release. No fun at all!!

 

所有跟帖: 

仰視? Why? -VanSmallLandlord- 給 VanSmallLandlord 發送悄悄話 (399 bytes) () 04/04/2012 postreply 16:58:52

17k,opm?專業術語一串串,聽不懂啊。就是仰慕一下architect,這title很牛。掏糞工名字不 -Nonsense123- 給 Nonsense123 發送悄悄話 Nonsense123 的博客首頁 (44 bytes) () 04/04/2012 postreply 17:04:04

看來你不常來這兒 -VanSmallLandlord- 給 VanSmallLandlord 發送悄悄話 (223 bytes) () 04/04/2012 postreply 17:56:58

:)怎麽投壇的人都很幽默? -Nonsense123- 給 Nonsense123 發送悄悄話 Nonsense123 的博客首頁 (0 bytes) () 04/04/2012 postreply 18:18:19

請您先登陸,再發跟帖!