agree,

來源: kukuren2000 於 2012-03-22 20:36:45 [] [舊帖] [給我悄悄話] 閱讀數 : (587 bytes)

agree, C0 should definitely Not be ignored, and most of time, it is negative in fact.

and when there is a conflict between NPV and IRR on an investment evaluation,  the correct answer is provided by NPV. 


所有跟帖： 

• There are circumstances where the NPV rule and IRR rule -kukuren2000- ♀ 給 kukuren2000 發送悄悄話 (1503 bytes) () 03/22/2012 postreply 22:07:28

• IRR model is totally wrong. Considering if you have multi IRRs. -sweetptt- ♂ 給 sweetptt 發送悄悄話 sweetptt 的博客首頁 (0 bytes) () 03/22/2012 postreply 22:19:47

• yes, IRR model is more limited. -kukuren2000- ♀ 給 kukuren2000 發送悄悄話 (0 bytes) () 03/22/2012 postreply 22:28:25

• IRR是分析是否值得投資，而NPV是計算具體回報，兩者相互相成，一點都不衝突 -大家幫我買房- ♂ 給 大家幫我買房 發送悄悄話 大家幫我買房 的博客首頁 (0 bytes) () 03/23/2012 postreply 08:01:26

• kukuren2000是明白人 -大家幫我買房- ♂ 給 大家幫我買房 發送悄悄話 大家幫我買房 的博客首頁 (0 bytes) () 03/23/2012 postreply 07:59:53

請您先登陸，再發跟帖！