The by law "Owner" is too broad, you were a guest at the tim

來源: 冬前 2023-01-19 09:27:26 [] [舊帖] [給我悄悄話] 本文已被閱讀: 次 (497 bytes)
回答: 馬上要參加HOA hearing了,緊張85232023-01-19 08:22:50

You were the quest at the time.  The rule is not to have residents occopy the quest parking for long length of time, given limited space.  The "Owner" should mean the residents, not the property owners if they don't live there.  You certainly can reason with the HOA and I guess they can wavier the fine in your case.  Remeber the rule is there for a reason and everyone should obey.  Of course there are exceptions and that what the hearing is for.

所有跟帖: 

great point. Thanks! -8523- 給 8523 發送悄悄話 8523 的博客首頁 (0 bytes) () 01/19/2023 postreply 09:46:20

不然讓你的租客天天停在guest上麵,既然你是owner,他自然不是owner了 -米奇的廚房- 給 米奇的廚房 發送悄悄話 米奇的廚房 的博客首頁 (87 bytes) () 01/19/2023 postreply 11:00:23

解釋條例的時候,不能把字麵意思故意改變。 -檸檬椰子汁- 給 檸檬椰子汁 發送悄悄話 檸檬椰子汁 的博客首頁 (51 bytes) () 01/19/2023 postreply 12:04:16

請您先登陸,再發跟帖!

發現Adblock插件

如要繼續瀏覽
請支持本站 請務必在本站關閉/移除任何Adblock

關閉Adblock後 請點擊

請參考如何關閉Adblock/Adblock plus

安裝Adblock plus用戶請點擊瀏覽器圖標
選擇“Disable on www.wenxuecity.com”

安裝Adblock用戶請點擊圖標
選擇“don't run on pages on this domain”