基因的發現和破解實在太厲害了。不過我反而覺得"西醫"是"不存在"的。

It is the same methods developed with physics, chemistry and biology applied to the human body. It doesn't have its own fundamental theories. Or perhaps it does while I am ignorant about it.  Chinese medicine really offers its own theory and methodology. It perhaps overlooks many things producing the physiology of the human body but it has its particular insights too. No way one can develop acupuncture without the guidance of a theory but by randomly sticking needles into the body and wait for its reaction.

Chinese medicine feels like a top-down approach while western medicine a bottom-up. 

Is it not the most obvious that the only honest approach is to take from each of these disciplines in order to heal patients?

所以，刻意反中醫者起碼就不誠實。

石凳解釋了熱情反中醫者的動機並非出於科學，但我還是不明白他們的心態: 自恨到這個程度起碼很尷尬啊。

所有跟帖： 

• 俺以前也聽到過這個觀點：西醫並不是一個獨立的學科，它隻是各種學科在人體健康方麵的應用。 -stonebench- ♂ (0 bytes) () 01/05/2023 postreply 20:23:49

• Here I borrow the concept of DNA to point out that -鈴蘭聽風- ♀ (749 bytes) () 01/05/2023 postreply 20:28:06

• 不太同意“外內法”，但絕對為你中西不同的深刻理解點讚！ -stonebench- ♂ (0 bytes) () 01/05/2023 postreply 20:39:30

• 打個不太恰當的比方 ~ ~ -鈴蘭聽風- ♀ (866 bytes) () 01/05/2023 postreply 21:00:44

• 我說的 top-down vs bottom-up 即是這個意思 . -中間小謝- ♂ (192 bytes) () 01/05/2023 postreply 21:27:46

• 哈哈，形象，明白！ -stonebench- ♂ (81 bytes) () 01/06/2023 postreply 04:53:03

• 玲瓏心, 有的. 心眼兒, 不多 : ) ) -鈴蘭聽風- ♀ (0 bytes) () 01/06/2023 postreply 18:49:52

• 是。經脈之學不是臆想也不是經驗積累。有位祝華英道長曾在靜中體驗到經脈，把經典中有記載而人們不太清楚的經脈關係完全理順了 -stonebench- ♂ (177 bytes) () 01/05/2023 postreply 20:54:34

• DNA同決定DNA表達一定同嗎？ -dhyang_wxc- ♂ (224 bytes) () 01/06/2023 postreply 07:31:49