文學作品中的知識量如果很突出的話

該是下麵幾種情形:

1. The knowledge is new for even experts. Then it is worthy for the interested reader  though the knowledge is revealed in "difficult "(thus technical or semi-technical) language.

2. Knowledge old, but the writer offers with new insights. Again, in a "difficult" language. Still worthy for the motivated readers. 

3. Old and without new insights but servers the literature as important constituents. In this case the knowledge should be restated in "easy" ( thus non-technical language ) otherwise they will fail to function.

 Naturally, 劉慈欣 is with 3.

Regarding 立 's work, since readers here (suposely well educated but not experts) declare that they could not follow the knowledge in it, therefore it isn't with 3. 

Then, which is it? 1 or 2 ?

 

 

 

所有跟帖： 

• 按上麵禾口和影雲的說法，立的小說應是 case 3. -中間小謝- ♂ (332 bytes) () 12/24/2020 postreply 12:34:10

• 洞察肯定有啦。不過洞察的東西讀者認不認可就是另外一回事了。 -禾口- ♀ (1335 bytes) () 12/24/2020 postreply 13:27:30

• 有你這樣的讀者，作者應該是很欣慰的~~~ -雪晶- ♀ (0 bytes) () 12/24/2020 postreply 20:11:48

• 小謝AI, 我選all the above if needed, or simply just feed you some co -影雲- ♀ (0 bytes) () 12/24/2020 postreply 12:37:36

• 不跟你爭論。給我幾個 case1, case2的例子。 -中間小謝- ♂ (0 bytes) () 12/24/2020 postreply 13:03:53

• 1. 犯罪心理與基因 2.青銅時代的曆史；請讀小說。 -影雲- ♀ (0 bytes) () 12/24/2020 postreply 13:09:33

• 小說不是科普讀物，也不是百科全書。小說的本質是故事和人物。 -LinMu- ♂ (0 bytes) () 12/24/2020 postreply 14:22:30