You have greatly oversimplified what you were trying to say:

“…when Fang started to "think", he fell for the same trap - oversimplifying things. Therefore he was still not truly inspired by what he had just witnessed.”

Here, you didn‘t explain the reason why a person can’t be truly inspired by something without knowing its whole history, which seems to me not true at all.

 

Also, there is no problem to write in English, but, please write in genuine English.

For example:

You can be converted to Islam, or Christianity, however, you can’t be converted to western culture, since, you can be a Christian, there is no way you can be western culture.

You can only accept or learn from western culture.

There is also a typo in your text, it should have been: “the Greeks had learnt from the Egyptians”, not “the Greeks had to learnt from the Egyptians”

所有跟帖: 

我們不要糾結 oversimplify 指什麽了,展開討論太長。 -中間小謝- 給 中間小謝 發送悄悄話 (555 bytes) () 11/08/2019 postreply 22:46:22

這不僅僅是英文水平問題,這是概念含混不清的問題, -豆角兒- 給 豆角兒 發送悄悄話 (1763 bytes) () 11/08/2019 postreply 23:44:33

我覺得你還是跟原文作者直接討論比較好。 -中間小謝- 給 中間小謝 發送悄悄話 (517 bytes) () 11/09/2019 postreply 00:06:57

好吧。你認為自己不需要嚴謹,更不需要臉紅。 -豆角兒- 給 豆角兒 發送悄悄話 (128 bytes) () 11/09/2019 postreply 00:43:40

沒品。不過如此。 -中間小謝- 給 中間小謝 發送悄悄話 (68 bytes) () 11/09/2019 postreply 01:07:26

是的,就我這點兒學識,我根本沒有資格和原文作者討論問題。 -豆角兒- 給 豆角兒 發送悄悄話 (192 bytes) () 11/09/2019 postreply 01:11:38

你有。討論問題怎麽會沒有資格呢?無論跟誰。 -中間小謝- 給 中間小謝 發送悄悄話 (242 bytes) () 11/09/2019 postreply 07:15:53

是,我們兩個之間的區別在於我認為我沒有資格,因為我知道自己的無知, -豆角兒- 給 豆角兒 發送悄悄話 (170 bytes) () 11/09/2019 postreply 10:48:05

請您先登陸,再發跟帖!