APAD:GIGO

Garbage in, garbage out

"Garbage in, garbage out" (GIGO) is a concept that states poor-quality or flawed input will produce a poor-quality or flawed output. This principle applies to computer science, mathematics, and decision-making systems, emphasizing that the validity of a result is dependent on the quality of the data or information it's based on. 

 The GIGO principle is applicable to any system that relies on input data, including decision-making processes, analytical programs, and even large language models (LLMs). For example, inaccurate sales data will lead to flawed demand forecasts, and poor-quality training data will result in a less reliable AI. 

The expression was popular in the early days of computing. The first known use is in a 1957 syndicated newspaper article about US Army mathematicians and their work with early computers, in which an Army Specialist named William D. Mellin explained that computers cannot think for themselves, and that "sloppily programmed" inputs inevitably lead to incorrect outputs. The underlying principle was noted by the inventor of the first programmable computing device design:

On two occasions I have been asked, "Pray, Mr. Babbage, if you put into the machine wrong figures, will the right answers come out?" ... I am not able rightly to apprehend the kind of confusion of ideas that could provoke such a question.

This phrase can be used as an explanation for the poor quality of a digitized audio or video file. Although digitizing can be the first step in cleaning up a signal, it does not, by itself, improve the quality. Defects in the original analog signal will be faithfully recorded, but might be identified and removed by a subsequent step by digital signal processing.

The phrase may also be used in the context of machine learning, where poor-quality training data will inevitably lead to a poor-quality model.

 

所有跟帖: 

Ahhh, no wonder Y different AIs provide different answers 2 -最西邊的島上- 給 最西邊的島上 發送悄悄話 最西邊的島上 的博客首頁 (0 bytes) () 11/07/2025 postreply 04:10:50

the same Q: using different DB so GIGO ;-)) -最西邊的島上- 給 最西邊的島上 發送悄悄話 最西邊的島上 的博客首頁 (0 bytes) () 11/07/2025 postreply 04:11:46

Hmm, would GIGO also apply to human thinking? -最西邊的島上- 給 最西邊的島上 發送悄悄話 最西邊的島上 的博客首頁 (0 bytes) () 11/07/2025 postreply 04:27:19

it should sound the same as giggle -移花接木- 給 移花接木 發送悄悄話 移花接木 的博客首頁 (0 bytes) () 11/07/2025 postreply 12:06:33

Yes & Here it is :-) -最西邊的島上- 給 最西邊的島上 發送悄悄話 最西邊的島上 的博客首頁 (194 bytes) () 11/07/2025 postreply 13:05:45

菩薩畏因,凡人畏果。But a bodhisattva would sure get fired :-) -7grizzly- 給 7grizzly 發送悄悄話 7grizzly 的博客首頁 (0 bytes) () 11/07/2025 postreply 09:59:06

So what? ;-) fired or not, a bodhisattva’ll be remembered ~~ -最西邊的島上- 給 最西邊的島上 發送悄悄話 最西邊的島上 的博客首頁 (0 bytes) () 11/07/2025 postreply 10:07:59

I think a bodhisattva is self-employed, isn't it? -移花接木- 給 移花接木 發送悄悄話 移花接木 的博客首頁 (0 bytes) () 11/07/2025 postreply 14:44:56

another thought: Math's foundation 4 all sciences, evenPiano -最西邊的島上- 給 最西邊的島上 發送悄悄話 最西邊的島上 的博客首頁 (0 bytes) () 11/07/2025 postreply 12:52:33

My song is garbage in masterpiece out because of 大腕‘s help:) -妖妖靈- 給 妖妖靈 發送悄悄話 妖妖靈 的博客首頁 (0 bytes) () 11/07/2025 postreply 13:49:30

Not convincing to me, until my song got touched by some -移花接木- 給 移花接木 發送悄悄話 移花接木 的博客首頁 (0 bytes) () 11/07/2025 postreply 14:46:12

big shots and turns out good -移花接木- 給 移花接木 發送悄悄話 移花接木 的博客首頁 (0 bytes) () 11/07/2025 postreply 14:46:39

學習了大腕英文是bigshot!你那首Home我隻是小小的插入語~我這次的合唱隻有四句話~對了,小棉襖那次我也隻說Y:) -妖妖靈- 給 妖妖靈 發送悄悄話 妖妖靈 的博客首頁 (0 bytes) () 11/07/2025 postreply 15:48:06

你的Home的萱草花部分,朋友聽了說唱得非常好,根本就沒想到是我唱的,對於我是妥妥的GIMO:)你的歌當然是MIMO:) -妖妖靈- 給 妖妖靈 發送悄悄話 妖妖靈 的博客首頁 (0 bytes) () 11/07/2025 postreply 16:25:04

請您先登陸,再發跟帖!