APAD:One law for the rich and another for the poor.

One law for the rich and another for the poor.

The law is same for both, but the rich, through their abundant resources, can get favourable decisions by influencing decision makers, hiring the best lawyers, and delaying the case if it suits them, among several measures at their command.

Example: The hotelier’s son went scot-free in the highly publicized hit-and-run case. After all, there is one law for the rich and another for the poor.

所有跟帖： 

• A dystopian view with some truth to it. -7grizzly- ♀ (0 bytes) () 06/01/2023 postreply 10:30:41

• 雙重標準？學習了scot-free，免於懲罰。 -妖妖靈- ♀ (0 bytes) () 06/01/2023 postreply 12:43:17

• 與中國曆史上公開的特權階層大罪必議，小罪必赦的八議製度不同，這裏法律有表麵上的公平 -移花接木- ♂ (0 bytes) () 06/01/2023 postreply 14:01:35