又聽了原讀,確實這些毛病都在。隻是不明白,為什麽t 要濁化呢? 再練練,再找書查查。感謝!
sharp ears!謝謝文青的金磚!
所有跟帖:
•
回複:sharp ears!謝謝文青的金磚!
-EnLearner-
♀
(346 bytes)
()
06/12/2011 postreply
18:29:40
•
我記得
-非文學青年-
♀
(67 bytes)
()
06/12/2011 postreply
18:45:35
•
totally agree. see above yugong de post.
-beautifulwind-
♀
(0 bytes)
()
06/12/2011 postreply
18:50:01
•
這個aren't you跟愚公說的那種情況不太一樣。
-非文學青年-
♀
(0 bytes)
()
06/12/2011 postreply
19:35:51
•
那還應該濁化嗎?
-beautifulwind-
♀
(0 bytes)
()
06/12/2011 postreply
20:31:13
•
好像不叫濁化,就是t+j變成ch音,所以我說和愚公說的t變成d不同。
-非文學青年-
♀
(75 bytes)
()
06/12/2011 postreply
21:34:53
•
恩,我再仔細聽聽。
-beautifulwind-
♀
(0 bytes)
()
06/12/2011 postreply
21:47:46
•
Check this one.
-EnLearner-
♀
(206 bytes)
()
06/12/2011 postreply
23:19:59
•
謝愚公! You are a doer!
-beautifulwind-
♀
(0 bytes)
()
06/13/2011 postreply
08:52:14
•
You're right. I finally found it in TAAG.
-EnLearner-
♀
(182 bytes)
()
06/12/2011 postreply
23:21:21