角色很混亂。既要表現出貼牌美國人的優越感，又要裝出是為中國好。世間的道理不是幾個冠冕堂皇的詞語那麽簡單。人多一點自知之明為好。

我的勸告：1）既然是站在美國立場。就最好不要對中國說教了。既不客觀也不會真誠。2）幾個美麗詞匯誰都會說，但沒有意義，更不成為優越感的基礎。世界是利益相關的世界。

所有跟帖： 

• It is not about Me. My article is about you. -ZoyaWashington- ♀ (294 bytes) () 10/12/2014 postreply 20:34:56

• 說出你報稅的名字以及SSN(以及密碼），好證實你所說的捐款是真的！Otherwise, you are a liar -630706- ♂ (0 bytes) () 10/12/2014 postreply 21:51:18

• I am flattered by your interest. Please don't patronize me. -ZoyaWashington- ♀ (314 bytes) () 10/12/2014 postreply 22:03:34

• 請你說說中國人在你公司的比率，再說說猶太人和黑人的收入差距，你就知道為什麽了！ -630706- ♂ (0 bytes) () 10/12/2014 postreply 22:12:51

• You deserve what I say! -630706- ♂ (0 bytes) () 10/12/2014 postreply 22:15:09

• Please name your company! You are a liar until you prove what -630706- ♂ (130 bytes) () 10/12/2014 postreply 22:18:46

• How we think of each other doesn't really matter. So long. -ZoyaWashington- ♀ (0 bytes) () 10/12/2014 postreply 22:37:41

• "I am flatted by your interest." Flatted, really? -yaowangshanhaiguan- ♀ (0 bytes) () 10/12/2014 postreply 22:35:54

• Fixed it. Thanks for catching the typo. -ZoyaWashington- ♀ (0 bytes) () 10/12/2014 postreply 22:40:32

• You're misleading the Chinese for saying"說美國民主不適於中國人，實在是對中國人整體的 -Wiserman- ♂ (194 bytes) () 10/13/2014 postreply 17:03:01

• 5cent you speaka chingrish? hahaha! -Roek- ♂ (0 bytes) () 10/13/2014 postreply 21:53:48

• "flattered' is correct,and flat never use as a verb. so should -630706- ♂ (32 bytes) () 10/12/2014 postreply 22:52:53

• 如何證明他的確捐了款？不能證明的事少胡吹！ -630706- ♂ (0 bytes) () 10/13/2014 postreply 10:30:13

• 非要我說的更明白清楚嗎？人貴有自知之明。 -lifei- ♀ (204 bytes) () 10/13/2014 postreply 04:58:47

• dumbass, it's not about me, the article is actually about you. -Roek- ♂ (0 bytes) () 10/13/2014 postreply 21:54:40

• 世界利益相關的不一定就是相反的，你不愛自己的居住國嗎？ -望自遠方- ♂ (0 bytes) () 10/12/2014 postreply 23:03:48

• +1''角色很混亂。既要表現出貼牌美國人的優越感，又要裝出是為中國好。世間的道理不是幾個冠冕堂皇的詞語那麽簡單。人多一點自知之明 -Roek- ♂ (0 bytes) () 10/13/2014 postreply 21:55:20