"equal" fight

1. You can also get lawyers who made contributions to
judges.

2. You can require a jury trial as defendent. Your lawyer has as much right to pick the jury as the other
side.

3. You can have your own lobbists as much as the other
side.

Of course, if your view of justice is way outside of
the main stream (i.e. can't find one out of 12 juries
to support it), you have no resource, or you are
the aggressive party, the other side would have
advantage.

所有跟帖： 

• 你知道JURY的traning是怎麽做的嗎？ -熱情以被你耗盡- ♀ (398 bytes) () 07/07/2004 postreply 08:14:19

• Jury --- your peers!! -##^^##- ♀ (398 bytes) () 07/07/2004 postreply 08:48:36

• 回複：Jury --- your peers!! -OJhadmoney- ♀ (398 bytes) () 07/07/2004 postreply 08:57:35

• Rodney King get away with $MM -???!!!???- ♀ (398 bytes) () 07/07/2004 postreply 09:50:12

• 講話要有依據，不要瞎猜 -熱情以被你耗盡- ♀ (398 bytes) () 07/07/2004 postreply 09:47:13

• 我講的是指刑事案。民案我不清楚。 -熱情以被你耗盡- ♀ (398 bytes) () 07/07/2004 postreply 09:50:04

• 刑事案的程序隻比民事複雜，不會簡單。民事案我都沒見過走過場 -就完的- ♀ (32 bytes) () 07/07/2004 postreply 18:13:43

• 被告有和控方同樣的機會對陪審團解釋案情，我過手的案子還沒見過 -走過場就完呢- ♀ (0 bytes) () 07/07/2004 postreply 18:09:47

• 請你詳細解釋一下。我在聯邦法院工作，沒見過什麽jury的培訓 -這是什麽東西？- ♀ (0 bytes) () 07/07/2004 postreply 18:05:17

• 哼哼,他是想說INSTRUCTION吧 -Michelle74- ♀ (0 bytes) () 07/07/2004 postreply 18:09:15

• 這樣啊，嗬嗬，我覺得他對CIV/CR PROCEDURE根本 -完全不了解- ♀ (34 bytes) () 07/07/2004 postreply 18:11:40