Jury --- your peers!!

來源: ##^^## 於 2004-07-07 08:48:36 [] [舊帖] [給我悄悄話] 閱讀數 : (398 bytes)
本文內容已被 [ ##^^## ] 在 2004-08-02 11:21:45 編輯過。如有問題，請報告版主或論壇管理刪除.
回答: "equal" fight 由 ##^^## 於 2004-07-07 06:22:42

They don't need any training. If one is too stupid to
understand and use the system, there is no one to
blame but himself/herself.

OJ trial is a perfect example to show the fairness
of U.S. justice system. He would be convicted in
almost any other system. You can say that he is rich,
but do you think he has more money than the county,
state? A black man can avoid conviction when a white
woman was killed and with so much evidence speaks
load than what you have to say.

Here is a question for you. Who determines what is
justice?

所有跟帖： 

• 回複：Jury --- your peers!! -OJhadmoney- ♀ 給 OJhadmoney 發送悄悄話 (398 bytes) () 07/07/2004 postreply 08:57:35

• Rodney King get away with $MM -???!!!???- ♀ 給 ???!!!??? 發送悄悄話 (398 bytes) () 07/07/2004 postreply 09:50:12

• 講話要有依據，不要瞎猜 -熱情以被你耗盡- ♀ 給 熱情以被你耗盡 發送悄悄話 (398 bytes) () 07/07/2004 postreply 09:47:13

• 我講的是指刑事案。民案我不清楚。 -熱情以被你耗盡- ♀ 給 熱情以被你耗盡 發送悄悄話 (398 bytes) () 07/07/2004 postreply 09:50:04

• 刑事案的程序隻比民事複雜，不會簡單。民事案我都沒見過走過場 -就完的- ♀ 給 就完的 發送悄悄話 (32 bytes) () 07/07/2004 postreply 18:13:43

• 被告有和控方同樣的機會對陪審團解釋案情，我過手的案子還沒見過 -走過場就完呢- ♀ 給 走過場就完呢 發送悄悄話 (0 bytes) () 07/07/2004 postreply 18:09:47

請您先登陸，再發跟帖！