回複:ZT:請法學專家從法學的角度分析分析:他該不該付贍養費?

來源: law111 2004-03-25 11:06:56 [] [舊帖] [給我悄悄話] 本文已被閱讀: 次 (1061 bytes)
Read this story a couple of times and also noted the comments. Feel uneasy about the change in people's attitude and perception of rightnesss since racing for western living and moral stands. This includes those of us living in U.S. Apparently we have learnt too much of America, its not-so-great aspects rather the others.

No. The law, either Chinese or U.S. common law, has no provisions to order L.D.take care of his biological mother. Certainly there are many and unknown reasons why he and his mom have selected for their course of actions so far, and everyone can interpret the reasons in every way possible. However, we all know what conciouseness is about and what a biological blood connection means. Without forgiveness and the warm heart, we all would live in a cold world full of deception and wrongful deeds. I am sure with time both L.D. and his mother will feel the regretfulness of not looking for a sensible solution but in an emotionless court process. Hope all of us visiting this site will make a note of it.

- Law111

所有跟帖: 

Chinese law? -wal-mart- 給 wal-mart 發送悄悄話 (845 bytes) () 03/25/2004 postreply 12:10:54

回複:Chinese law? -law111- 給 law111 發送悄悄話 (873 bytes) () 03/25/2004 postreply 12:24:35

回複:回複:Chinese law? -wal-mart- 給 wal-mart 發送悄悄話 (768 bytes) () 03/25/2004 postreply 15:26:52

回複:回複:回複:Chinese law? -law111- 給 law111 發送悄悄話 (1230 bytes) () 03/25/2004 postreply 15:52:55

請您先登陸,再發跟帖!

發現Adblock插件

如要繼續瀏覽
請支持本站 請務必在本站關閉/移除任何Adblock

關閉Adblock後 請點擊

請參考如何關閉Adblock/Adblock plus

安裝Adblock plus用戶請點擊瀏覽器圖標
選擇“Disable on www.wenxuecity.com”

安裝Adblock用戶請點擊圖標
選擇“don't run on pages on this domain”