回複:回複:Chinese law?

來源: wal-mart 2004-03-25 15:26:52 [] [舊帖] [給我悄悄話] 本文已被閱讀: 次 (768 bytes)
回答: Chinese law?wal-mart2004-03-25 12:10:54
I did not speculate. It was not me who stated "The law, either Chinese or U.S. common law, has no provisions to order L.D.take care of his biological mother". What do you mean by "factual non-existence"? As a matter of fact, the natural parent-child relationship has been existing ever since, both legally and factually. I am not aware of any law in the US or in China that permits blood parents to disclaim such relationship. One way, maybe the only way to cut it off, is through adoption.
I am not trying to judge whether seeking remedy at a court is right or wrong. How absurd may it be, now the dispute is in the court anyway. You cannot ask the complainant to drop the law suit because YOU THINK it is not sensible to bring it in the first place, can you?

所有跟帖: 

回複:回複:回複:Chinese law? -law111- 給 law111 發送悄悄話 (1230 bytes) () 03/25/2004 postreply 15:52:55

請您先登陸,再發跟帖!

發現Adblock插件

如要繼續瀏覽
請支持本站 請務必在本站關閉/移除任何Adblock

關閉Adblock後 請點擊

請參考如何關閉Adblock/Adblock plus

安裝Adblock plus用戶請點擊瀏覽器圖標
選擇“Disable on www.wenxuecity.com”

安裝Adblock用戶請點擊圖標
選擇“don't run on pages on this domain”