No.

Constitution says: 

Representatives and direct Taxes shall be apportioned among the several States which may be included within this Union, according to their respective Numbers, which shall be determined by adding to the whole Number of free Persons, including those bound to Service for a Term of Years, and excluding Indians not taxed, three fifths of all other Persons. The actual Enumeration shall be made within three Years after the first Meeting of the Congress of the United States, and within every subsequent Term of ten Years, in such Manner as they shall by Law direct. 

以前不僅數公民，還數奴隸。如果沒有奴隸，憲法規定是要按“free Person”數，而不是citizen。

所有跟帖： 

• 憲法定的時候國家還未成立當然數自由人而不是公民。但是當國家成立後這個自由人就應該自然指的是公民了。否則 -桃花源主- ♂ (80 bytes) () 07/15/2019 postreply 20:53:13

• 條文規定是以後每十年要數一次，什麽國家未成立？狡辯啊 -檸檬椰子汁- ♂ (0 bytes) () 07/16/2019 postreply 03:16:51

• 那為什麽公民有投票權而非自由人有投票權 -桃花源主- ♂ (0 bytes) () 07/16/2019 postreply 04:10:46

• 公民不一定有投票權，有投票權不一定是公民。 -檸檬椰子汁- ♂ (1287 bytes) () 07/16/2019 postreply 05:50:50

• 曆史上蓄奴是合法，那要不要現在也當成合法？虧你還是法律專業的，搬曆史來說話 -ecolio157h7- ♂ (129 bytes) () 07/16/2019 postreply 13:18:06

• 我沒有提倡非公民選舉，憲法說人口統計要算所有人。請不要隨便歪曲。 -檸檬椰子汁- ♂ (0 bytes) () 07/16/2019 postreply 16:45:20

• 川普加個公民問題也是算所有人啊，即統計公民有多少，也統計總人數多少 -ecolio157h7- ♂ (62 bytes) () 07/16/2019 postreply 17:49:44

• 禁止蓄奴需要憲法13修正案，你有本事你也去通過一個人口統計修正案。不懂法律不要隨便假設。 -檸檬椰子汁- ♂ (0 bytes) () 07/16/2019 postreply 16:46:18

• "那為什麽公民有投票權而非自由人有投票權",他這句話什麽意思？ -笑薇.- ♀ (0 bytes) () 07/16/2019 postreply 10:27:55

• Reply -檸檬椰子汁- ♂ (772 bytes) () 07/16/2019 postreply 10:52:47

• 回應 -單身老貓- ♂ (1405 bytes) () 07/16/2019 postreply 06:10:48

• 關鍵是憲法定的時候，公民製度建立了麽？有護照，證件，戶籍等等證明公民嗎？ -桃花源主- ♂ (0 bytes) () 07/16/2019 postreply 19:53:49

• 回應 -單身老貓- ♂ (160 bytes) () 07/16/2019 postreply 21:55:59