那就發表在這裏，讓我們看看是否邏輯。。

The reviewer's comment is worst that I have ever seen.
1) the reviewer complains about the rationality of this paper.
2) the reviewer complains about logic flow of your ideas.

Based on these two, it is really bad.

Maybe your ideas are so revolutionary that sounds very bizare to even the scientists with much imagination (astronomers). Can you share the article with us or at least part of it?

所有跟帖： 

• http://arxiv.org/abs/astro-ph/0510535 -人類拯救計劃- ♂ (122 bytes) () 06/06/2010 postreply 10:04:58

• 我是誰？ -人類拯救計劃- ♂ (1630 bytes) () 06/06/2010 postreply 14:39:23

• 謝謝，拜讀了你的大作，有以下粗略的感想。 -2ndglance- ♂ (646 bytes) () 06/06/2010 postreply 20:34:52

• 那你就讀一下別人的文章吧： -人類拯救計劃- ♂ (1698 bytes) () 06/06/2010 postreply 20:52:48

• 假如你有反對聖經的證據，你打算怎麽寫？？ -人類拯救計劃- ♂ (156 bytes) () 06/06/2010 postreply 21:01:14