that's exactly my point

來源: egghead1 2012-03-23 19:50:12 [] [舊帖] [給我悄悄話] 本文已被閱讀: 次 (425 bytes)

according to your logic and formula, even if there is no cash flow, as long as Cn is greater than C0, your formula will be positive for a very small r. so you are saying it's still positive cash flow because you can find an r to make the formula positive. If that's the case, most real estate investments will have positive cash flows. that's not right at all. Finding an IRR has nothing to do with positive cash flow.

請您先登陸,再發跟帖!

發現Adblock插件

如要繼續瀏覽
請支持本站 請務必在本站關閉/移除任何Adblock

關閉Adblock後 請點擊

請參考如何關閉Adblock/Adblock plus

安裝Adblock plus用戶請點擊瀏覽器圖標
選擇“Disable on www.wenxuecity.com”

安裝Adblock用戶請點擊圖標
選擇“don't run on pages on this domain”