Xiaobaitu, how are you? Two questions here. Thanks!

(1) My 140 and 485 is pending now. At this stage, I know I can not change my visa from H1 to F1, how about changing to O1?

(2) I have read one of your previous posters. It seems that one can submit two 140. Is it a good idea for me to submit another one when the first one is pending? I may have better publications and recommendation letters for the 2nd one.

Thank you very much in advance!

所有跟帖： 

• 1. ok 2. ok, 兩個GC必須是不同類型 -radiology- ♂ (0 bytes) () 01/29/2008 postreply 18:46:06

• Thanks, radiology. XBT said one person can have two NIW 140. -mys- ♂ (39 bytes) () 01/29/2008 postreply 19:11:01

• 回複：I don't tkink so, you might misunderstand XBT -radiology- ♂ (0 bytes) () 01/29/2008 postreply 19:17:55

• 回複：Xiaobaitu, how are you? Two questions here. Thanks! -pjiang- ♀ (172 bytes) () 01/29/2008 postreply 19:20:24

• 回複：謝謝你給這個連接,我不認為這個一個人可以交多份 -radiology- ♂ (539 bytes) () 01/29/2008 postreply 20:06:27

• 兔M, 你還堅持你的觀點嗎? -radiology- ♂ (0 bytes) () 01/29/2008 postreply 20:08:20

• 其實在以前4個中心都處理I-140的時候，是有很多law firm這麽幹的 -xiaobaitu- ♀ (261 bytes) () 01/29/2008 postreply 21:53:28

• 也就是說規定並不是許可的,特別是同個人在相同地址投放 -radiology- ♂ (286 bytes) () 01/29/2008 postreply 22:30:23

• 應該說有可操作性，因為地址並沒有假，如果是因為Efiling被 -xiaobaitu- ♀ (54 bytes) () 01/29/2008 postreply 22:49:40

• 這個空子不好鑽,誰敢肯定交第二份申請不會到第一份的 -radiology- ♂ (64 bytes) () 01/30/2008 postreply 06:42:19

• 法不禁即可行，－－移民局沒有不許可的規定。 -pjiang- ♀ (0 bytes) () 01/29/2008 postreply 20:19:04

• 豈不是太多傻瓜了, 居然沒有發現這條截徑? -radiology- ♂ (0 bytes) () 01/29/2008 postreply 20:31:35

• it is possible -niwbaby- ♀ (75 bytes) () 01/30/2008 postreply 06:53:51

• 不認為是＂鑽了空子＂ - 回複：it is possible -pjiang- ♀ (579 bytes) () 01/30/2008 postreply 07:14:08

• 回複：我覺得的有點偷換概念,交多個485並不是說可以用 -radiology- ♂ (501 bytes) () 01/30/2008 postreply 08:17:03

• 回複：XBT提到換地址後再申請140是可能的,但也是有欺騙 -radiology- ♂ (58 bytes) () 01/30/2008 postreply 08:22:15

• 回複：Xiaobaitu, how are you? Two questions here. Thanks! (圖) -just-do-it!- ♀ (377 bytes) () 01/30/2008 postreply 20:19:39