180 天從何時算的官方解釋, Xiaobaidu, Radiology 好像錯了

下麵是UCCIS關於AC-21的原文解釋:
If the Form I-140 has been approved and the Form I-485 has been filed and
remained unadjudicated for 180 days or more (as measured from the form I-485 receipt
date), the approved Form I-140 will remain valid even if the alien changes jobs or
employers as long as the new offer of employment is in the same or similar occupation.
If the Form I-485 has been pending for less than 180 days, then the approved Form I-
140 shall not remain valid with respect to a new offer of employment.

這裏麵指出從receipt date算起. 這個日期應該是received date而不是notice date吧? Xiaobaidu, Radiology 好像錯了啊?

所有跟帖： 

• 回複：180 天從何時算的官方解釋, Xiaobaidu, Radiology 好像錯了 -pjiang- ♀ (186 bytes) () 09/15/2007 postreply 14:23:16

• receipt date不是receive date,我的理解是receipt被print out的那天 -xiaobaitu- ♀ (25 bytes) () 09/15/2007 postreply 17:18:55

• Xiaobaitu 有沒有對於你的理解的官方解釋呢? -一鳴爹- ♂ (57 bytes) () 09/15/2007 postreply 19:34:47

• 小白兔，你這個理解是不對的 -stevenj- ♂ (582 bytes) () 09/15/2007 postreply 19:59:44

• 等你和政府官員打交道多了，你就知道他們是怎麽想問題的了 -xiaobaitu- ♀ (422 bytes) () 09/15/2007 postreply 21:39:06

• Pjiang,我也希望Xiaobaitu說的是錯的, 但是 -一鳴爹- ♂ (485 bytes) () 09/15/2007 postreply 22:23:08

• receive date有兩種: 一是移民局的physical接到,郵局任務 -radiology- ♂ (296 bytes) () 09/16/2007 postreply 06:56:31

• 移民局的郵件室應該是流水作業的，received date和 notice date分別代表兩道工序 -xiaobaitu- ♀ (199 bytes) () 09/16/2007 postreply 10:36:09

• 謝謝Pjiang,Xiaobaitu&Radiology -一鳴爹- ♂ (81 bytes) () 09/16/2007 postreply 11:29:39

• 其實我不支持凡事都要“尋找官方依據”的做法， 因為有很多情況並沒有“官方依據”而是慣例 -xiaobaitu- ♀ (374 bytes) () 09/16/2007 postreply 11:51:30

• 但是對於同一個case,Notice Date也不是唯一的啊 -stevenj- ♂ (757 bytes) () 09/16/2007 postreply 19:42:42

• Right. I got duplicate 797, notice date changed significantly -pharmacyelite- ♂ (155 bytes) () 09/25/2007 postreply 08:43:52