葛朗台本人filed law suit against INS and FBI to save a buck or two. (stuck in name check for N-400 filing,interview was on 4/17/06, and was told the only thing missing is the name check approval). Followed are the facts, 敬請指教:
2/6/07 Complaint filed
4/27/07 Last day to meet and confer re: initial disclosure, early settlement, ADR process selection and discovery plan or file joint ADR certification with stipulation to ADR process or notice of need for ADR phone conference. b>(DID NOT TAKE ANY ACTION BESIDES SERVED ALL THE DEFENDANTS.)
5/11/07 Will be the last day to complete initial disclosure or state objection in Rule 26(f) report, file casre management statement and ile/serve rule 26(f) report.
5/18/07 case management conference in Oakland.
4/30/07 received answer from attorneys for defendants stating that the court should dismiss the complaint for lack of subject matter jurisdiction.
4/25/07 received a letter from US Dept of Homeland Securities SF office requesting additional info to prove marital status from 4/26/06 to present (interview date was 4/17/06) and asked to do another finger print since the first one expired.
葛朗台想知道, 4/25/07 移民局的信是不是因為訴訟, 才重新審理移民案件(on the letter, there is an officer name, also hand writing "amended request" and "mandamus";還是隻是因為指模過期了。
葛朗台尋問了陳丹虹事務所, 要收費$2500 接過訴訟。 心疼!!
請問各位高人,如何處理。 急!!
先謝了!!
小白兔及各位高人,請指教 - WOM
所有跟帖:
•
這點很難判斷,不過要求fingerprint就提供,dismiss與否不是
-xiaobaitu-
♀
(96 bytes)
()
05/06/2007 postreply
17:02:19
•
回複:這點很難判斷,不過要求fingerprint就提供,dismiss與否不是
-葛朗台2-
♀
(344 bytes)
()
05/06/2007 postreply
18:21:31
•
5/18那天是第一次開庭,法官不可能那天就做出判決,所以那天
-xiaobaitu-
♀
(262 bytes)
()
05/06/2007 postreply
18:46:56
•
回複:5/18那天是第一次開庭,法官不可能那天就做出判決,所以那天
-葛朗台2-
♀
(189 bytes)
()
05/06/2007 postreply
20:28:18