LDL到底是不是壞東西？應該降低到小於2？最近真是糊塗了。

所有跟帖： 

• 根本就沒有壞的膽固醇, 隻有壞的科學在騙人幾十年 -益生菌- ♂ (0 bytes) () 12/01/2014 postreply 15:20:18

• 能不能把支持您的觀點的最關鍵的幾篇文獻（原始論文，綜述）給出link，我一直找不到有說服力的文章。謝謝 -吃與活- ♂ (0 bytes) () 12/01/2014 postreply 15:30:20

• 可能沒說清楚：包括膽固醇與心血管疾病無關的，LDL無害的，還有多吃富含膽固醇的飲食有益健康的等等 -吃與活- ♂ (105 bytes) () 12/01/2014 postreply 15:38:54

• 多謝，期待佳作 -吃與活- ♂ (0 bytes) () 12/01/2014 postreply 16:53:07

• Ox-LDL is more relevant to CVD. -tantema- ♂ (9 bytes) () 12/01/2014 postreply 18:56:58

• Yes, it's the oxidized and glycated LDL particles that matter -Lily168- ♀ (0 bytes) () 12/01/2014 postreply 19:04:13

• what is glycated LDL? -tantema- ♂ (0 bytes) () 12/01/2014 postreply 19:08:33

• It's an LDL particle that has its proteins bound to sugar molecu -Lily168- ♀ (111 bytes) () 12/01/2014 postreply 19:35:43

• 你看到了回答嗎? -益生菌- ♂ (0 bytes) () 12/01/2014 postreply 19:38:56

• re Dr. Stephanie Seneff? Yes -Lily168- ♀ (0 bytes) () 12/01/2014 postreply 19:47:57

• I can't judge yet - it's too early -Lily168- ♀ (100 bytes) () 12/01/2014 postreply 19:54:39

• 查了1982年的一篇綜述, 動物細胞的生物膜上確實是cholesterol sulfate -益生菌- ♂ (0 bytes) () 12/01/2014 postreply 20:07:51

• This is how she described the process -Lily168- ♀ (907 bytes) () 12/01/2014 postreply 20:25:46

• Her whole picture, -益生菌- ♂ (1303 bytes) () 12/01/2014 postreply 21:16:33

• 讀了好幾遍，有不少疑點。待消化一些後再問問題。可能問題會很多！謝謝 -Lily168- ♀ (0 bytes) () 12/01/2014 postreply 22:18:34