Annual death rate under vaccination

來源: nshen6 2021-06-26 09:56:07 [] [舊帖] [給我悄悄話] 本文已被閱讀: 次 (519 bytes)
回答: 隻見樹木 不見森林solo12021-06-26 06:33:57

You can't use 2020 vs 2021 as annual death rate cut off. It created biased variation due to vaccine was not widely available until May. You should use rolling forward looking projection based on current run rate. Take Santa Clara county for example, it's close to herd immunity now with 72% fully vaccinated. Everything is open and no mask requirement. The current death rate is 2 per day due to unvaccinated people. You can redo your model now -:)

 

 

所有跟帖: 

唉,這算不錯了。LZ以前曾發過一個貼子,用首次疫苗公開接種的日子當切點,來比較前後疫情變化,說打疫苗後更糟了 -fuz- 給 fuz 發送悄悄話 fuz 的博客首頁 (0 bytes) () 06/26/2021 postreply 11:17:51

This is simply wrong. 做人要有底線。 -nshen6- 給 nshen6 發送悄悄話 (0 bytes) () 06/26/2021 postreply 11:58:20

+ 做人要有底線 -TBz- 給 TBz 發送悄悄話 TBz 的博客首頁 (0 bytes) () 06/26/2021 postreply 13:04:46

你歪曲了不是。我是說效果甚微,就是說這個效果太小,死亡曲線上肉眼觀察不出來。 -solo1- 給 solo1 發送悄悄話 (0 bytes) () 06/26/2021 postreply 13:05:45

想起一個類比:計劃生育後,中國人口繼續增長。 -Shine20- 給 Shine20 發送悄悄話 Shine20 的博客首頁 (47 bytes) () 06/26/2021 postreply 14:21:58

請您先登陸,再發跟帖!

發現Adblock插件

如要繼續瀏覽
請支持本站 請務必在本站關閉/移除任何Adblock

關閉Adblock後 請點擊

請參考如何關閉Adblock/Adblock plus

安裝Adblock plus用戶請點擊瀏覽器圖標
選擇“Disable on www.wenxuecity.com”

安裝Adblock用戶請點擊圖標
選擇“don't run on pages on this domain”