I don't think you can compare 0.008% to 4% directly

michaelusa2 · 2021-04-19 07:07:13Z

I don't think you can compare 0.008% to 4% directly簡介

來源: michaelusa2 於 2021-04-19 07:07:13 [檔案] [舊帖] [給我悄悄話] 閱讀數 : (369 bytes)

回答: 你顯性地考慮時間的因素沒有錯，但我的計算方法和你的在本質上沒有不同，結論仍然成立。理由見下麵內容區。由密碼過期於 2021-04-18 21:24:17

they are based on different population, 0.008% based on full-vaccined people, while, 4% is based on people who felt sick or randomly picked for testing which is a subset of non-vaccinated people + full-vaccination people

您的位置：文學城 » 論壇 » 健康養生 » I don't think you can compare 0.008% to 4% directly

所有跟帖：

• 0.008% is based on time span while 4% is daily -michaelusa2- ♂ (0 bytes) () 04/19/2021 postreply 07:12:17

• 這個問題已經在給slow_quick的答複中解釋了。見回複的“內容”區。這裏假設在一定時段內都是4%，並從而得出一個量級上有意義 -密碼過期- ♂ (0 bytes) () 04/19/2021 postreply 07:47:39

請您先登陸，再發跟帖！