I don't think you can compare 0.008% to 4% directly

來源: michaelusa2 2021-04-19 07:07:13 [] [舊帖] [給我悄悄話] 本文已被閱讀: 次 (369 bytes)

they are based on different population, 0.008% based on full-vaccined people, while, 4% is based on people who felt sick or randomly picked for testing which is a subset of non-vaccinated people + full-vaccination people

所有跟帖: 

0.008% is based on time span while 4% is daily -michaelusa2- 給 michaelusa2 發送悄悄話 (0 bytes) () 04/19/2021 postreply 07:12:17

這個問題已經在給slow_quick的答複中解釋了。見回複的“內容”區。這裏假設在一定時段內都是4%,並從而得出一個量級上有意義 -密碼過期- 給 密碼過期 發送悄悄話 密碼過期 的博客首頁 (0 bytes) () 04/19/2021 postreply 07:47:39

請您先登陸,再發跟帖!

發現Adblock插件

如要繼續瀏覽
請支持本站 請務必在本站關閉/移除任何Adblock

關閉Adblock後 請點擊

請參考如何關閉Adblock/Adblock plus

安裝Adblock plus用戶請點擊瀏覽器圖標
選擇“Disable on www.wenxuecity.com”

安裝Adblock用戶請點擊圖標
選擇“don't run on pages on this domain”