Dan Rather的評論:

來源: xiao-min 2017-03-17 10:13:45 [] [舊帖] [給我悄悄話] 本文已被閱讀: 次 (4660 bytes)

"Cruel and unusual," the phrase rings in my head as I read the press reports of President Donald Trump's proposed budget.

But to even talk about it as a budget is to miss the point. It is not a budget. It is a philosophy, and one that may come as a surprise to many of the people who voted for Mr. Trump. They will hurt in real ways. Meanwhile it confirms the worst existential fears of those who see his presidency as a threat to the very being of the United States they know and love.

This is a man who made a lot of promises on the campaign about helping those struggling in society, about leading the United States to greatness in such things as fighting disease. If anyone had any doubt about the hollowness of his words, this philosophy is all the evidence one would need.

This is a philosophy that doesn't believe in helping the poor, rural or urban, or the power of diplomacy or the importance of science. It is a philosophy that doesn't want to protect the environment. It doesn't believe in the arts. This is about putting a noose around much of the United States federal government and hanging it until it shakes with life no more. In the name of reining in waste, it rains pain and suffering amongst the Americans who already are the most vulnerable. It must be remarked that many of these programs are really small budget items in the greater scheme of things, rounding errors in the federal budget. The purpose is to send a message, not to save money.

Rather than investing in what truly will make America great, this philosophy pounds its chest with false bravado. People will die because of this budget. People will suffer. Diseases will spread, and cures will not be found (really? slash science research?) Our nation will be darker and more dangerous. You know it's a philosophy because the budget has few details really in it. And here is where I see its saving grace.

This philosophy is not the United States I think a majority of Americans would recognize. I believe that we are not so cruel, so shortsighted, so dark. It's easy to rail against the federal government on the campaign stump, but cutting programs that people rely on, that is the kind of thing that can break through the fake news into reality very soon. We have already seen the mess that has become of the health care efforts.

This philosophy is no longer theoretical and it will be a rallying cry for a reverse philosophy. Those who champion an empathetic America, an America prepared for the challenges of the modern world, will have plenty of evidence to point to. Mr. Trump has already put many Republicans in Congress on a defensive footing, on Russia and on healthcare. Wait until the constituents start calling about how they won't be able to heat their homes in the winter or the agricultural programs that were slashed.

"The administration's budget isn't going to be the budget," Senator Marco Rubio told the Washington Post. "We do the budget here. The administration makes recommendations, but Congress does budgets." You can expect to hear a lot more of that kind of rhetoric.

Mr. Trump's philosophy is an opening salvo in a battle for the soul of America that is only beginning. This will be a battle fought trench by trench. But I think it is winnable and America will reconfirm a governing philosophy that is hopeful, compassionate, and wise about the role of government in making our world a safer, fairer, and more just place to live.

 

 

所有跟帖: 

寫得真好! -吃與活- 給 吃與活 發送悄悄話 吃與活 的博客首頁 (112 bytes) () 03/17/2017 postreply 10:30:39

我也試驗成功我的電飯鍋版糙米做法: 不按米飯鍵, 而是自己設50分鍾. 軟而香 -xiao-min- 給 xiao-min 發送悄悄話 (247 bytes) () 03/17/2017 postreply 10:40:51

好吃是好吃了,但我懷疑這是不是有可能會改變糙米的GI? -吃與活- 給 吃與活 發送悄悄話 吃與活 的博客首頁 (68 bytes) () 03/17/2017 postreply 10:45:54

可能~~ -xiao-min- 給 xiao-min 發送悄悄話 (163 bytes) () 03/17/2017 postreply 10:48:24

檢討什麽? -蕭紫箬- 給 蕭紫箬 發送悄悄話 (0 bytes) () 03/17/2017 postreply 15:22:39

民主黨的人吧? -ymck- 給 ymck 發送悄悄話 ymck 的博客首頁 (0 bytes) () 03/17/2017 postreply 13:52:18

除了finger pointing的指責,他沒有寫出任何批評床鋪proposal實質性的東西。 -蕭紫箬- 給 蕭紫箬 發送悄悄話 (285 bytes) () 03/17/2017 postreply 15:21:35

科學家也是普通人,就靠政府經費混飯吃,做出來的研究絕大部分無法重複,現在遇到一個務實的總統當然不高興 -醫者意也- 給 醫者意也 發送悄悄話 醫者意也 的博客首頁 (0 bytes) () 03/17/2017 postreply 16:58:54

看文字一開頭,就知道來者不善,你說對了。 -happycow222- 給 happycow222 發送悄悄話 (0 bytes) () 03/17/2017 postreply 20:53:51

胡說八道。 -happycow222- 給 happycow222 發送悄悄話 (0 bytes) () 03/17/2017 postreply 20:52:40

請您先登陸,再發跟帖!

發現Adblock插件

如要繼續瀏覽
請支持本站 請務必在本站關閉/移除任何Adblock

關閉Adblock後 請點擊

請參考如何關閉Adblock/Adblock plus

安裝Adblock plus用戶請點擊瀏覽器圖標
選擇“Disable on www.wenxuecity.com”

安裝Adblock用戶請點擊圖標
選擇“don't run on pages on this domain”