古代的魚膽 和現在的魚膽有很大不同。現在的魚膽你都不知道有多少化學藥品和其它毒物。。

來源: TXY 2015-12-20 12:32:10 [] [舊帖] [給我悄悄話] 本文已被閱讀: 次 (3048 bytes)
本文內容已被 [ TXY ] 在 2015-12-20 14:43:51 編輯過。如有問題,請報告版主或論壇管理刪除.

The present study determined concentrations of estrogenic bisphenol A (BPA), nonylphenol, octylphenol (4-tert-octylphenol), butylphenol (4-tert-butylphenol), and progestogenic norethindrone by liquid chromatography–tandem mass spectrometry in bile extracts from field fish from the Xin'an River and market fish in Shanghai, China. Compared with the field fish, endocrine disrupting chemical (EDC) concentrations in market fish bile were at relatively high levels with high detectable rates. The average concentrations of BPA, nonylphenol, 4-tert-octylphenol, 4-tert-butylphenol, and norethindrone in field fish bile were 30.1 µg/L, 203 µg/L, 4.69 µg/L, 7.84 µg/L, and 0.514 µg/L, respectively; in market fish bile they were 240 µg/L, 528 µg/L, 76.5 µg/L, 12.8 µg/L, and 5.26 µg/L, respectively; and in the surface water of Xin'an River they were 38.8 ng/L, 7.91 ng/L, 1.98 ng/L, 2.66 ng/L, and 0.116 ng/L, respectively. The average of total estrogenic activity of river water was 3.32 ng/L estradiol equivalents. High bioconcentration factors (BCFs) were discovered for all 5 EDCs (≧998-fold) in field fish bile. Furthermore, the authors analyzed the BCF value of BPA in fish bile after 30-d exposure to environmentally relevant concentrations of BPA in the laboratory, and the analysis revealed that BCF in fish bile (BCFFish bile) changed in an inverse concentration–dependent manner based on the log10-transformed BPA concentration in water. Strikingly, the data from the field study were well fitted within this trend. The data together suggested that analysis of fish bile extracts could be an efficient method for assessing waterborne EDCs exposure for aquatic biota. Environ Toxicol Chem2015;9999:1–9. 

所有跟帖: 

同意。孩子吃了一年半魚膽都沒事。不排除那條大草魚是在工業汙染的水域捕撈的,是屬於工業汙染中毒而並非魚膽。 -醫者意也- 給 醫者意也 發送悄悄話 醫者意也 的博客首頁 (686 bytes) () 12/20/2015 postreply 13:36:59

比魚膽毒幾萬倍的高濃度水銀都可以注射在初生嬰兒體內,連續注射五六年,西醫都認定是安全的無害的,更何況現在是9歲的孩子? -醫者意也- 給 醫者意也 發送悄悄話 醫者意也 的博客首頁 (306 bytes) () 12/20/2015 postreply 14:16:19

好像魚膽有毒吧,記得以前看過一篇文章,一個媽媽將魚膽給女兒吃去火,結果小女孩死了 -lily60- 給 lily60 發送悄悄話 lily60 的博客首頁 (0 bytes) () 12/20/2015 postreply 17:07:52

話不能這樣說,很多兒童注射了疫苗後就死亡,西醫不也說疫苗是安全的嗎?你說的這個報道可以歸類為Anecdotal -醫者意也- 給 醫者意也 發送悄悄話 醫者意也 的博客首頁 (143 bytes) () 12/20/2015 postreply 17:14:00

請您先登陸,再發跟帖!

發現Adblock插件

如要繼續瀏覽
請支持本站 請務必在本站關閉/移除任何Adblock

關閉Adblock後 請點擊

請參考如何關閉Adblock/Adblock plus

安裝Adblock plus用戶請點擊瀏覽器圖標
選擇“Disable on www.wenxuecity.com”

安裝Adblock用戶請點擊圖標
選擇“don't run on pages on this domain”