The Amgen scientists approached the papers' original authors to discuss findings and sometimes borrowed materials to repeat the experiments. In some cases, those authors required them to sign an agreement that they would not disclose their findings about specific papers. Begley and Ellis were therefore not free to identify the irreproducible papers — a fact that the Comment should have mentioned.
拜耳是另外一個。Amgen隻能重複大約 10%,而且他們都聯係了原作者討論實驗條件的。
The Amgen scientists approached the papers' original authors to discuss findings and sometimes borrowed materials to repeat the experiments. In some cases, those authors required them to sign an agreement that they would not disclose their findings about specific papers. Begley and Ellis were therefore not free to identify the irreproducible papers — a fact that the Comment should have mentioned.
所有跟帖:
• Wrong interpretation: they said "could be validated to the point -26484915- ♂ (40 bytes) () 10/02/2014 postreply 06:44:13
• 說的不是拜耳而是Amgen. “ were able to reproduce findings in only 11% of -viewfinder- ♀ (190 bytes) () 10/02/2014 postreply 06:48:56
• Amgen 是這樣定義 non-reproduced -26484915- ♂ (369 bytes) () 10/02/2014 postreply 07:32:03