反歌森的個例

個例，尤其是未經證實的個例，不應該用於判斷一種療法是否有效。比如下麵一個個例
就是反歌森的：


My dead friend Yvonne chose to treat her uterine cancer naturally at age 51 rather than following the advice of multiple MD's to get a hysterectomy. She eventually wound up at the Gerson clinic in Mexico, coffee enemas and all. She continued the treatment at home and shortly thereafter died in a 'regular' hospital, where at least I hope her pain was controlled. By this point, there was nothing they could do. The cancer had spread to her rectum and also affected her internal organs. Who knows if the caffeine in the enemas caused the cancer to spread even faster. Yeah, so, RIP Yvonne. No doubt your hu*****and and son miss you very much. I am the only female in my family w/o cancer, but if God forbid I am ever diagnosed I will not be going to Mexico for treatment and/or putting coffee up my butthole.

所有跟帖： 

• Amazon裏成百上千上說他的療法有效的評論怎們不拿出來？ -tournier- ♀ (0 bytes) () 06/02/2014 postreply 08:02:03

• 所以要有雙盲的統計數據才有說服力 -whoareyou- ♂ (131 bytes) () 06/02/2014 postreply 08:07:00

• 問題是統計的東西弄虛作假的空間很大，所有被FDA下架的西藥都是據說經過了雙盲統計的對不對？ -醫者意也- ♂ (100 bytes) () 06/02/2014 postreply 08:30:59

• 不是統計弄虛作假作假， 而是怎麽看待統計數據本身和怎樣采集統計數據是關鍵， -陌上花開緩緩行- ♀ (197 bytes) () 06/02/2014 postreply 08:53:03

• 那是你個人的看法而已。 -醫者意也- ♂ (112 bytes) () 06/02/2014 postreply 08:56:44

• 你是中醫才這麽說， 你更有偏向性。而我既不是中醫也不是西醫， 更中立。 -陌上花開緩緩行- ♀ (0 bytes) () 06/02/2014 postreply 09:05:34

• 化療背後有巨大的利益驅動，這是事實，不需要中醫或西醫的背景都可以了解的事實。 -醫者意也- ♂ (90 bytes) () 06/02/2014 postreply 09:10:12

• 他們的觀點貼，沒有你偏激， 可以相信多點。 對你的技術貼， 我很尊重， -陌上花開緩緩行- ♀ (18 bytes) () 06/02/2014 postreply 09:12:16

• 原來把人稱為精神病和瘋狂世界的人反而就不偏激了，很好，很好。。 -醫者意也- ♂ (0 bytes) () 06/02/2014 postreply 09:16:26

• 哈哈。沒人說那兩人是瘋狂和精神病吧。 -陌上花開緩緩行- ♀ (40 bytes) () 06/02/2014 postreply 09:19:03

• 你我立場不同，多說也無用。 -醫者意也- ♂ (0 bytes) () 06/02/2014 postreply 09:23:38

• 說服別人，傳達自己的觀點信念時候，且勿走極端。 -陌上花開緩緩行- ♀ (0 bytes) () 06/02/2014 postreply 09:25:12

• 希望不要用雙重標準。 -醫者意也- ♂ (0 bytes) () 06/02/2014 postreply 09:29:31