Time: Omicron Could Be the Beginning of the End of the COVID-19

來源: fuz 2022-01-26 19:35:46 [] [博客] [舊帖] [給我悄悄話] 本文已被閱讀: 次 (10107 bytes)
本文內容已被 [ fuz ] 在 2022-01-26 19:46:54 編輯過。如有問題,請報告版主或論壇管理刪除.

Omicron Could Be the Beginning of the End of the COVID-19 Pandemic
 

https://time.com/6141679/omicron-end-covid-19/
 

……………

Even leading scientists have been tempted by the idea, admitting that of all the versions of SARS-CoV-2 that have hit humanity over the past two years, Omicron might be the preferable one to get infected with, since it doesn’t make the immunized that sick. And if more vaccinated people are infected with Omicron and develop immunity, that protection, combined with the protection that some people might have from being infected with previous variants, could reach the magical herd immunity threshold—which experts say could be anywhere between 70%-90% of people recovered from or vaccinated against COVID-19—that would finally make SARS-CoV-2 throw up its spike proteins in defeat.

………

(好話說了)

According to some models, by the time Omicron works its way through the population, up to half of people around the globe will have been infected, and presumably immune to the variant. With fewer unprotected hosts to infect, viruses generally begin to peter out—epidemic influenza viruses are a good example—and optimistic models show that after a peak of cases by the end of January and beginning of February, SARS-CoV-2 may follow that path. Under that assumption, COVID-19 would begin its shift from being a pandemic disease to an endemic one, confined to pockets of outbreaks that erupt among immunocompromised populations or the unvaccinated, such as the youngest kids—but are manageable and containable because most people would be protected from the worst effects of the virus.

(壞話也講了)

But there’s also the possibility of a darker timeline, in which the unpredictable nature of SARS-CoV-2 to date drives the next year and beyond. If that occurs, it could mean the sobering possibility that Omicron is not the beginning of the end, but just the beginning of a more transmissible, more virulent virus that could do even more harm than it has already.

 

(莫謂言之不預也)

Scenario #1: The COVID-19 virus has achieved equilibrium with humans

………………老長了,很有趣的故事,自己去開眼

 

Scenario #2: The virus could keep changing in unpredictable and possibly deadly ways

 

(典型的英倫風格結尾,麵麵俱到、滴水不漏、無懈可擊)

Experts’ best guesses at what comes next

How likely is it that Omicron is indeed SARS-CoV-2’s last hurrah? Farrar puts the odds at 40% to 50%.

One major reason the odds aren’t higher is that Omicron’s genetic changes make it more capable of evading capture by the antibodies the immune system makes, both after natural infection and vaccination. That helps the virus to spread more quickly—up to the tipping point at which if the virus is too good at spreading and causing disease, then it becomes self-defeating.

“The virus doesn’t want to kill its host,” says Dr. Warner Greene, former director of and current senior investigator at the Gladstone Institute of Virology. “That’s counterproductive.” That could explain why Omicron is so impressively transmissible, but, for those with some protection, especially from vaccines, not particularly dangerous—making it possible that this particular version of the virus is the one that will persist in the human population for years and years to come.

That’s the path public health experts hope SARS-CoV-2 will take, following the example of the other common coronaviruses. “The best scenario is for the virus to become so weakened it just becomes a vaccine itself,” says Greene. “It would spread but it wouldn’t cause severe disease. In that kind of setting, the virus would start to lose its foothold and become endemic in very small areas, replicating only when it finds people who are not previously infected or vaccinated.”

That’s assuming, of course, that most of the world’s population is vaccinated, or recovered from being naturally infected with Omicron. The fewer opportunities SARS-CoV-2 has to replicate and produce more copies of itself, the fewer people will become infected, and the fewer people will get sick. Every variant in the virus’s short two-year history is the direct result of unchecked viral replication, so the surest way to turn COVID-19 from a pandemic into an endemic disease is to shut down as many of those opportunities as possible. “If we have learned anything from the past year, it is that variants will continue to emerge,” says Ho. “What will be helpful is to establish growing immunity, either from vaccines or infections. That will help protect the population from the next one.”

 

 

所有跟帖: 

非常棒的一篇科普文,在技術層麵用平民語言,講得全麵實在。值得通讀幾遍。然後,能夠理解這兩年我們經曆了什麽,知道了什麽 -fuz- 給 fuz 發送悄悄話 fuz 的博客首頁 (125 bytes) () 01/26/2022 postreply 19:49:10

如果“病毒不想讓宿主死亡所以越變越溫和是為了自己的繁衍”的論點成立,那變得更容易傳播和低致病性到自取滅亡,豈不是自相矛盾嗎? -阿明.- 給 阿明. 發送悄悄話 (340 bytes) () 01/26/2022 postreply 21:31:44

病毒的智慧,是人賦予的。搞不過病毒,就說太狡猾。其實,病毒是天生的,變異也是本性。至於傳不傳,得看碰上誰。宿命…命數… -fuz- 給 fuz 發送悄悄話 fuz 的博客首頁 (0 bytes) () 01/26/2022 postreply 22:20:41

世衛組織應該招募世界上最聰明的人來研究病毒。現在的病毒專家都不是新冠病毒的對手。 -阿明.- 給 阿明. 發送悄悄話 (0 bytes) () 01/26/2022 postreply 22:39:42

這個基本上是川大嘴的“大流感”了。人類已經滅不了它,隻有提高免疫力來對抗/共存了。新一代從小都經過洗禮,情況會好得多。過上十多年 -周老大- 給 周老大 發送悄悄話 周老大 的博客首頁 (41 bytes) () 01/26/2022 postreply 22:29:26

小的會增加抵抗力,老的就難了。 -阿明.- 給 阿明. 發送悄悄話 (0 bytes) () 01/26/2022 postreply 22:42:34

所以,過去很少開發老年人疫苗。近些年沒啥幹的了,才開始琢磨老年帶泡、肺炎球菌等疫苗,效果也不持久。這次新冠再次證實了老年免疫衰退 -fuz- 給 fuz 發送悄悄話 fuz 的博客首頁 (0 bytes) () 01/27/2022 postreply 06:03:30

被豬隊友害死也隻能認命,盡量設法提高免疫力。我之前說過,長壽將會變得很困難了。 -周老大- 給 周老大 發送悄悄話 周老大 的博客首頁 (0 bytes) () 01/27/2022 postreply 08:23:45

活一天高興一天,日子就是這麽混出來的。沒有日積,那有年月。別想太多太遠了,徒增煩惱 -fuz- 給 fuz 發送悄悄話 fuz 的博客首頁 (0 bytes) () 01/27/2022 postreply 08:28:49

請您先登陸,再發跟帖!

發現Adblock插件

如要繼續瀏覽
請支持本站 請務必在本站關閉/移除任何Adblock

關閉Adblock後 請點擊

請參考如何關閉Adblock/Adblock plus

安裝Adblock plus用戶請點擊瀏覽器圖標
選擇“Disable on www.wenxuecity.com”

安裝Adblock用戶請點擊圖標
選擇“don't run on pages on this domain”