國債和absolute NNN比,用下麵的McDonald lease as example。

Years 1-5		2046666
12/18/23
12/31/27
$92,100		4.50%
–
Years 6-10
1/1/28
12/31/32
$101,310		4.95%
10.00%
Years 11-15
1/1/33
12/31/37
$111,441		5.45%
10.00%
Years 16-20
1/1/38
12/31/42
$122,585		5.99%
10.00%
Option 1
1/1/43
12/31/47
$134,844		6.59%
10.00%
Option 2
1/1/48
12/31/52
$148,328		7.25%
10.00%
Option 3
1/1/53
12/31/57
$163,161		7.97%
10.00%
Option 4
1/1/58
12/31/62
$179,477		8.77%
10.00%
Option 5
1/1/63
12/31/67
$197,425		9.65%
10.00%
Option 6
1/1/68
12/31/72
$217,167		10.61%
10.00%
Option 7
1/1/73
12/31/77
$238,884		11.67%
10.00%
Option 8
1/1/78
12/31/82
$262,772		12.84%
10.00%

所有跟帖： 

• 結論：國債永遠比不過NNN -laoshi48104- ♀ (172 bytes) () 06/30/2024 postreply 17:51:01

• 這個世界沒有永遠吧？隻是高風險高收益。要不就是說市場是傻子。股票也可以遺傳step up cost -Xiaoxiaollll- ♂ (0 bytes) () 06/30/2024 postreply 18:19:19

• 最重要的一點是風險高，房子位於一個很小的城市，房子本身根本不值這麽多，開價這麽高是因為租約和麥當勞這個大租客，如果 -圭媽- ♀ (126 bytes) () 06/30/2024 postreply 18:47:57

• Just use lease as example to compare bond and NNN. -laoshi48104- ♀ (246 bytes) () 06/30/2024 postreply 19:21:10

• 你認為人口隻有幾千人的小地方的土地值錢嗎？這個地產的 -圭媽- ♀ (284 bytes) () 06/30/2024 postreply 20:19:43

• 麥當勞為什麽要簽這麽高租金，這麽多年的租約？麥當勞這麽好的餐館，為什麽當冤大頭？ -Xiaoxiaollll- ♂ (0 bytes) () 06/30/2024 postreply 22:21:10