宣傳FF/Opera是萬靈藥是“坑害外行” - misled users...

->很多所謂的IE問題不是單純的IE問題，而是係統的問題。(不是微軟才有係統問題)

It is not 單純的IE問題, but a IE design problems - binding is the culprit (or we can say Windows design problems, but IE is an application on Windows). Let's simplify it. If there is no binding, IE can be much more free from the security troubles and protects Windows better. Binding is two side blade.

->用FF/Opera不解決係統的問題。就這麽簡單。
That's true. Both behaves excelent on different platforms. They have less security problems on OS.

->對同一個用戶而言，如果你有心去裝FF等，你也可以用那些時間/精力配好IE並更新係統，補上漏洞。後者才是關鍵。
Do you mean it takes the same "時間/精力配好IE並更新係統，補上漏洞" as that to install FF? If so, can you please give us your value results?

->FF的很多功能在基於IE的外殼上都可以實現，而且這些外殼有很多FF沒有的功能。而這些外殼往往比FF要小得多。
Do you know how many customers know how to use 外殼? Is the 外殼 the browser or IE?

所有跟帖： 

• 強烈反對樓主的看法。 -王樹臨風- ♂ (894 bytes) () 02/08/2006 postreply 17:08:48

• If you want 外行 ignore the security issues then ... -lao228- ♀ (361 bytes) () 02/08/2006 postreply 18:15:21

• 哈哈。我真被你搞迷糊了。你好象是不希望 -ppzcgg- ♀ (189 bytes) () 02/08/2006 postreply 21:30:31

• 我不同意你文中的觀點並不等於"宣傳 FF 是萬靈藥" -Lao228- ♀ (15 bytes) () 02/08/2006 postreply 22:01:22

• lao228 又中計了， -王樹臨風- ♂ (374 bytes) () 02/09/2006 postreply 09:15:52

• World Wide cares the security very much now -Lao228- ♀ (224 bytes) () 02/09/2006 postreply 11:50:40

• IE的捆綁使IE贏得了市場和你所謂的易用性,卻帶來 -lao228- ♀ (404 bytes) () 02/08/2006 postreply 19:36:01

• 宣傳 FF 等最負麵的地方就在於宣傳你這種認識 -ppzcgg- ♀ (734 bytes) () 02/08/2006 postreply 21:21:02

• 不知是你誤解我,或我誤解你? -lao228- ♀ (919 bytes) () 02/08/2006 postreply 21:52:17

• lao228 的漏洞。。 -王樹臨風- ♂ (280 bytes) () 02/09/2006 postreply 09:08:24

• Why do you avoid talking about "binding" -Lao228- ♀ (0 bytes) () 02/09/2006 postreply 11:44:06

• Here is something you maybe interested in -Lao228- ♀ (58 bytes) () 02/09/2006 postreply 12:28:52