1年前有個麵試,.net developer,interviewer是公司產品的architect,這個職位是幫他們把原來classic asp move到asp.net,介紹產品的時候,他特別興奮的給我宣布:我們產品可好了,db那邊特別幹淨,一個store procedure都沒有。我當時特別茫然的看著他那張因為興奮脹得通紅的臉,說:very impressive, i guess next phase will be get rid of database altogether...
林子大了,真的什麽鳥都有。
說起store procedure....
所有跟帖:
•
haha, good one
-世界無童話-
♀
(0 bytes)
()
10/17/2009 postreply
19:15:40
•
FYI...It’s possible!
-HappyNow?!-
♂
(430 bytes)
()
10/17/2009 postreply
20:01:30
•
靠,真讓我給蒙上了,這好像是外星人的approach...
-撅著挺好-
♂
(53 bytes)
()
10/17/2009 postreply
20:10:22
•
FYI...5000+ transactions/second using COM+ !
-HappyNow?!-
♂
(136 bytes)
()
10/17/2009 postreply
20:18:46
•
不是很明白它的架構....
-撅著挺好-
♂
(180 bytes)
()
10/18/2009 postreply
01:20:19
•
要不是HappyNow提醒, 我還真沒注意到這個. 我們的
-小謀-
♀
(105 bytes)
()
10/17/2009 postreply
20:22:03
•
not the same thing, though!
-HappyNow?!-
♂
(271 bytes)
()
10/17/2009 postreply
20:25:54
•
CR 是啥?
-小謀-
♀
(0 bytes)
()
10/17/2009 postreply
20:32:28
•
yeah, we use UID and PWD a lot.
-小謀-
♀
(0 bytes)
()
10/17/2009 postreply
20:15:30
•
not the same thing, though!
-HappyNow?!-
♂
(0 bytes)
()
10/17/2009 postreply
20:20:42
•
哦~~
-小謀-
♀
(0 bytes)
()
10/17/2009 postreply
20:23:35
•
真是無知者無畏呀,當然可以選擇不用一個SP, 虧你說得出口
-waitGC-
♀
(0 bytes)
()
10/17/2009 postreply
20:26:15
•
at some point, he was absolutely RIGHT!
-HappyNow?!-
♂
(53 bytes)
()
10/17/2009 postreply
20:28:42
•
Agree. It sounds the architect didn't understand DB.
-ffppyy-
♂
(0 bytes)
()
10/17/2009 postreply
21:20:13
•
原來兩位都是搞數據庫的.
-小謀-
♀
(0 bytes)
()
10/17/2009 postreply
20:34:18
•
Hibernate, hibernate...
-ncpga-
♂
(0 bytes)
()
10/17/2009 postreply
22:29:47
•
你的回帖總是讓人精神振奮,鬥誌昂揚,哈哈~~
-撅著挺好-
♂
(0 bytes)
()
10/18/2009 postreply
01:04:11
•
我們現在做的這個項目基本上沒有sp啊
-布衣之才-
♂
(16 bytes)
()
10/17/2009 postreply
20:50:19
•
entity framework是or mapping,你如何query against data?
-撅著挺好-
♂
(20 bytes)
()
10/18/2009 postreply
01:06:45
•
EF maps db tables, views and relationships into objects
-布衣之才-
♂
(192 bytes)
()
10/18/2009 postreply
18:55:10
•
if u use profiler to check the query against ur database..
-撅著挺好-
♂
(224 bytes)
()
10/18/2009 postreply
21:30:24
•
You don't need stored proccedures at all if you want to ...
-oneusdollar-
♂
(743 bytes)
()
10/17/2009 postreply
22:27:06
•
i assume u don't have access to datatable, right?
-撅著挺好-
♂
(238 bytes)
()
10/18/2009 postreply
01:13:56
•
這也太高深了。一點兒都不user friendly. 我有access to
-小謀-
♀
(32 bytes)
()
10/18/2009 postreply
06:49:07
•
Why use database at all if you don't access table...
-oneusdollar-
♂
(1873 bytes)
()
10/18/2009 postreply
10:44:27
•
excellent point, thank you for sharing!
-HappyNow?!-
♂
(0 bytes)
()
10/18/2009 postreply
10:54:38
•
r u talking about BEST practice?
-撅著挺好-
♂
(1698 bytes)
()
10/18/2009 postreply
16:00:07
•
accessing data table means access its schame....
-撅著挺好-
♂
(72 bytes)
()
10/18/2009 postreply
17:07:37
•
回複:accessing data table means access its schame....
-海闊天空33-
♀
(708 bytes)
()
10/18/2009 postreply
20:03:46
•
The worst thing in industry is....
-撅著挺好-
♂
(783 bytes)
()
10/18/2009 postreply
21:20:36
•
I had the same feeling: the old day was the
-HappyNow?!-
♂
(44 bytes)
()
10/19/2009 postreply
10:42:04