中國天文學在最近10年取得了偉大的進步!

來源: pieq314 2012-12-17 08:38:39 [] [博客] [舊帖] [給我悄悄話] 本文已被閱讀: 次 (1902 bytes)

A short 8 years ago, Chinese space exploration was extremely backward and uninformed of current activities.  The only thing those engineers knew was sending men into low earth orbit.  Yes, they were engineers that controlled Chinese space program.  They knew nothing about science.  The science they knew was 太空育種,哈哈, 讓人笑掉大牙!  They knew nothing (at least, pretend to know nothing) about the robotic explorations. 

However, in the last decade, scientists slowly gained a voice in how to spend research money.  For example, 嫦娥 program is an example: it costs MUCH less than the useless Shengzhou spaceship, but produced vastly greater scientific results!

Not all space explorations need to be in space.  Ground based telescopes are extremely important, and China does not have good telescopes.  Again, scientists got hold of some money, and recently contructed a 4-m telescope (the previous size was a little over 2 meters, and there are only 2 of them in China). China has less than 10 telescopes at 1 meter and up (1 4-meter telescope, 2 2-m telescope, and a few 1 meter telescopes).

China is also building an observatory in Antarctica, on Dome A to be precise.  In fact, right now, there is a team there to service the observatory there.  Antarctica is the best observation site on Earth, and a lot easier to get to than space.

China is also collaborating internationally.  For example, China is a 10% partner in building a 30-m telescope.   It will cost 1 billion dollars.  If China did not waste the money on Shenzhou, China could have contributed sufficient money so that this telescope could be build now (contribute more will result more telescope time).

In summary, with scientists beginning to gain control of the space money, useful science is showing up.

所有跟帖: 

政府想做好的確實能做好,中國的軍工素質很高 -xiaoyuzi- 給 xiaoyuzi 發送悄悄話 xiaoyuzi 的博客首頁 (132 bytes) () 12/17/2012 postreply 08:53:51

隻要有錢就好辦事。自己不會的話,跟會的人合作就行。 -pieq314- 給 pieq314 發送悄悄話 pieq314 的博客首頁 (0 bytes) () 12/17/2012 postreply 09:34:52

yes -pieq314- 給 pieq314 發送悄悄話 pieq314 的博客首頁 (0 bytes) () 12/17/2012 postreply 09:35:07

應該是航天工程, not 天文學. 天文學是一門基礎學科 -ily- 給 ily 發送悄悄話 ily 的博客首頁 (317 bytes) () 12/17/2012 postreply 09:25:51

以前工程師完全掌權的時候,他們就是完全把它當成一個工程問題,不考慮科學價值。 -pieq314- 給 pieq314 發送悄悄話 pieq314 的博客首頁 (288 bytes) () 12/17/2012 postreply 09:33:52

哈哈,明明是你自己不懂,把航天工程當作天文學,就不要辯解了。掌權的把航天工程當作科學也好,當作工程也罷,他們不會把航天工程當做天 -沒辦法隻好注冊- 給 沒辦法隻好注冊 發送悄悄話 (185 bytes) () 12/17/2012 postreply 12:59:35

你覺得嫦娥是航天工程?看來你的思想還停留在10前中國(世界四五十年前)的水平呀。 -pieq314- 給 pieq314 發送悄悄話 pieq314 的博客首頁 (194 bytes) () 12/17/2012 postreply 16:30:35

嫦娥項目算成航天工程比算成天文學更靠譜些,你可明白? -沒辦法隻好注冊- 給 沒辦法隻好注冊 發送悄悄話 (0 bytes) () 12/17/2012 postreply 20:00:14

你硬要算我也沒辦法,隻要不冒出月球育種這類 -pieq314- 給 pieq314 發送悄悄話 pieq314 的博客首頁 (93 bytes) () 12/17/2012 postreply 21:07:23

你把天文學的基本概念都弄錯了,東拉西扯的有意思嗎?這裏除了PB和你外,誰看不出來? -沒辦法隻好注冊- 給 沒辦法隻好注冊 發送悄悄話 (0 bytes) () 12/18/2012 postreply 06:49:56

看來你把美國的, ESA的 Moon, Mars, Jupiter, Saturn,Asteroid missions都看成工程 -pieq314- 給 pieq314 發送悄悄話 pieq314 的博客首頁 (0 bytes) () 12/18/2012 postreply 08:27:36

中國軍工抄前蘇聯,民用抄歐美,堅持此方針,前途是光明滴:)) -金山法海- 給 金山法海 發送悄悄話 (0 bytes) () 12/17/2012 postreply 09:34:39

按照貓論,炒也沒關係,隻要知道自己在做什麽就行。 -pieq314- 給 pieq314 發送悄悄話 pieq314 的博客首頁 (0 bytes) () 12/17/2012 postreply 10:28:12

請您先登陸,再發跟帖!

發現Adblock插件

如要繼續瀏覽
請支持本站 請務必在本站關閉/移除任何Adblock

關閉Adblock後 請點擊

請參考如何關閉Adblock/Adblock plus

安裝Adblock plus用戶請點擊瀏覽器圖標
選擇“Disable on www.wenxuecity.com”

安裝Adblock用戶請點擊圖標
選擇“don't run on pages on this domain”