LARGE CARS:
Buick LaCrosse,
Ford Taurus,
Lincoln MKS,
Volvo S80
SMALL CARS:
Honda Civic 4-door models (except Si)with optional ESC,
Kia Soul,
Nissan Cube,
Subaru Impreza(except WRX),
Volkswagen Golf 4-door models
MIDSIZE CARS:Audi A3,Chevrolet Malibu built after November 2009
Chrysler Sebring 4-door models with optional ESC
Dodge Avenger with optional ESC
Mercedes C class, Subaru Legacy,Subaru Outback
Volkswagen Jetta sedan, Volkswagen Passat sedan
Volvo C30 2010-11 models
MIDSIZE SUVs
Dodge Journey
Subaru Tribeca
Volvo XC60
Volvo XC90
SMALL SUVs
Honda Element
Jeep Patriot
with optional side torso airbags
Subaru Forester
Volkswagen Tiguan
2010 safest car From IIHS
所有跟帖:
•
2009 safest car From IIHS
-泥腿-
♂
(2736 bytes)
()
01/25/2010 postreply
13:15:50
•
沒有用,IIHS的測試本來就有理論錯誤,所以沒什麽用
-S.A.L.-
♂
(245 bytes)
()
01/25/2010 postreply
13:30:01
•
其實,車撞牆,自重輕的,反而有優勢,慣性小嘛。這測試是明顯的誤導
-S.A.L.-
♂
(42 bytes)
()
01/25/2010 postreply
13:35:35
•
人家測得是撞車後對乘客的影響,你偏強調車況的損失。2嘛失
-用戶名被占用了-
♂
(0 bytes)
()
01/25/2010 postreply
16:57:22
•
車撞牆試驗,車越重撞的越慘! 整個動能都被吸收了!
-wahaha-
♀
(0 bytes)
()
01/25/2010 postreply
17:47:32
•
所以人家測試時按大小重量區分對比嘛。再說了
-用戶名被占用了-
♂
(140 bytes)
()
01/25/2010 postreply
17:52:36
•
This is the best comment I have ever seen. Very entertaining
-CarCrazier-
♂
(0 bytes)
()
01/25/2010 postreply
18:57:46
•
不要笑話我們這些非專業車貧人士好不好
-用戶名被占用了-
♂
(0 bytes)
()
01/26/2010 postreply
07:24:34
•
No, buddy. Your previous post hits the right point
-CarCrazier-
♂
(58 bytes)
()
01/26/2010 postreply
08:09:15
•
哦,誤會誤會,被批評灌了 :-D
-用戶名被占用了-
♂
(0 bytes)
()
01/26/2010 postreply
08:30:23
•
好說,好說。咱哥們,who vs who ah?:-)
-CarCrazier-
♂
(0 bytes)
()
01/26/2010 postreply
08:38:57